Mozambican Civil Society Within: - UNICEF Mozambique - Home page
Mozambican Civil Society Within: - UNICEF Mozambique - Home page
Mozambican Civil Society Within: - UNICEF Mozambique - Home page
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Mozambican</strong> <strong>Civil</strong> <strong>Society</strong> <strong>Within</strong>: Evaluation, Challenges, Opportunities and Action<br />
This classification is the arithmetic average of the scores assigned to 80 indicators organized<br />
in 27 sub-dimensions and finally synthesized in the four dimensions: structure (1.1), values<br />
(1.1), environment (1.2) and impact (1.0). In a comparison of the best and worst scores, the<br />
weakness of civil society is demonstrated by the fact that 15% of the 80 indicators had a score<br />
of zero, 59% were between 0 and 1.5, and 26% had a score equal to or over 1.5. In other words,<br />
about 74% of the variables are below average, while only 26% had a classification equal to or<br />
above average.<br />
It must be emphasized once again that the scoring should be considered indicative of the state<br />
of the arenas considered rather than hard and fast numbers. It was not always easy to assign<br />
a score. The technical team is conscious of the high degree of subjectivity of many variables.<br />
But the effort and opportunity of numerical classification are useful for a process of precise,<br />
rigorous and clear evaluation and for preparing future plans to improve the state of <strong>Mozambican</strong><br />
civil society.<br />
Figure 1.1.1b: Distribution of Scores for the 80 CSI Indicators, <strong>Mozambique</strong> 2007<br />
Above 1.5<br />
26%<br />
=Zero<br />
15%<br />
Below1.5<br />
59%<br />
INE, 2006: 98<br />
Main strehgths of the <strong>Mozambican</strong> <strong>Civil</strong> <strong>Society</strong>, 2007<br />
According to Annex 4 containing the detailed scores of the 80 indicators, 21 areas have a score<br />
equal to or above the average of 1.5.<br />
In the Structure dimension of the CSI five areas are the strongest, or show the most merit:<br />
charitable giving and volunteering, geographical distribution of CSOs, effectiveness of the<br />
management bodies of CSO federations or networks, and communication among CSOs.<br />
In the civil society Environment dimension, the level of political competition, the right to<br />
information, press freedom, tolerance, public awareness and dialogue with donors received a<br />
score of 2.0. The Values dimension had an above-average classification in four areas: tolerance<br />
within civil society, non-violence in civil society, actions against poverty, and equity in diversity<br />
within civil society.<br />
xxx<br />
<strong>Civil</strong> <strong>Society</strong> Index, <strong>Mozambique</strong> 2007