29.11.2014 Views

Mozambican Civil Society Within: - UNICEF Mozambique - Home page

Mozambican Civil Society Within: - UNICEF Mozambique - Home page

Mozambican Civil Society Within: - UNICEF Mozambique - Home page

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Mozambican</strong> <strong>Civil</strong> <strong>Society</strong> <strong>Within</strong>: Evaluation, Challenges, Opportunities and Action<br />

Figure 2.1.2: Non-Profit Organisations According to Year Established<br />

From 1994 to<br />

2003,<br />

40%<br />

Before 1974,<br />

21%<br />

From1974 to 1983,<br />

14%<br />

From 1984 to<br />

1993,<br />

25%<br />

INE, 2006: 98<br />

As regards their origins, most associations are young (INE, 2006: 45), which is understandable<br />

given the context of the changed paradigm in the political system that permitted the introduction<br />

of the new constitution in 1990. This new constitutional framework led to the law on freedom of<br />

association and thus the expansion of civil organisations.<br />

In recent decades the evolution of the role of civil <strong>Society</strong> can be seen in the way its various<br />

component groups get involved, participate and contribute to a variety of events, processes<br />

and even situations of national crisis or crisis within their communities.<br />

These civil society groups have evolved from just service delivery, previously the government’s<br />

responsibility, to active participants in research and advocacy actions that put pressure on the<br />

state and international institutions. These actions focus on the need to improve public policies<br />

and community development in <strong>Mozambique</strong> and in Africa in general.<br />

In order to give some idea of the distribution of CSO involvement and their purpose, Figure<br />

2.2.4 compares the situation as seen by the 2003 INE census of non-profit institutions with the<br />

recent situation recorded by the CSO survey under the CSI project. 4<br />

The methodology of the CSI project tried to take into account not only the categories proposed<br />

by CIVICUS but also those of INE as well as other categories missing from the INE classification<br />

because of its focus on formal organizations i.e. organisations that were registered or had a<br />

recognized address.<br />

The CSI survey tried to contemplate informal organizations, including those that were not<br />

registered or did not have a formal address, such as savings groups and other community<br />

forms. For this reason, figure 2.1.3 contains a category called “community organizations” which,<br />

by definition, were not contemplated in the INE census. As the INE CINSFLU2003 (2006) only<br />

contemplated more or less formal organizations, the CSI project also tried to cover socially<br />

relevant but functionally informal community organizations.<br />

4<br />

For the purposes of this research on CSOs, non-profit organizations are considered civil society organizations (CSO).<br />

<strong>Civil</strong> <strong>Society</strong> Index, <strong>Mozambique</strong> 2007<br />

19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!