Mozambican Civil Society Within: - UNICEF Mozambique - Home page
Mozambican Civil Society Within: - UNICEF Mozambique - Home page
Mozambican Civil Society Within: - UNICEF Mozambique - Home page
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Mozambican</strong> <strong>Civil</strong> <strong>Society</strong> <strong>Within</strong>: Evaluation, Challenges, Opportunities and Action<br />
3.2.7.3 Corporate Philanthropy<br />
Until recently the subject of corporate philanthropy was virtually unknown in the deliberations<br />
and concerns of for-profit enterprises. But nowadays there are more and more companies who<br />
want to have a pro-active social attitude in daily life.<br />
The limited literature available shows that activities linked to social investment are mainly in the<br />
fields of education, health, water and sanitation, food, housing and information technology and<br />
most are concentrated in the areas where these companies operate. Assistance in these fields<br />
comprises mainly the supply of infrastructure and assistance when natural disasters occur.<br />
Actions that “emancipate” communities are still embryonic.<br />
Most social investments support and/or complement the government’s efforts and are provided<br />
directly. In INOSOC07 respondents felt that corporative philanthropy in <strong>Mozambique</strong> is still<br />
insignificant. Involvement with civil society organizations is still small. The private sector is still<br />
not the main source of funding for CSOs. Nevertheless, a number of partnerships between<br />
some companies (usually large ones) and civil society are emerging. Allowing for the fact that<br />
a number of CSOs, albeit only a few, receive funds from the private sector this indicator received<br />
a score of 1.0.<br />
3.2.8 <strong>Civil</strong> <strong>Society</strong> Relations with Donors<br />
This sub-dimension did not exist in the model initially proposed by CIVICUS, but the national<br />
team felt it was necessary to contemplate and recognize the relationship between civil society<br />
and donors. There is a description of the kind of relations between civil society and donors, and<br />
an average score of 1.3 was given, meaning that relations are generally weak, probably because<br />
most donor support focuses on the state. Table 3.2.10 summarizes the scores of the respective<br />
indicators.<br />
TABLE 3.2.10: Indicators for Evaluating Relations with Donors<br />
Ref. # Indicators Score<br />
2.8.1 Aid/External Dependence of CS. 0.5<br />
2.8.2 Dialogue with Donors 2.0<br />
2.8.3 Cooperation/Donor Support for CS 1.5<br />
62<br />
<strong>Civil</strong> <strong>Society</strong> Index, <strong>Mozambique</strong> 2007