Mozambican Civil Society Within: - UNICEF Mozambique - Home page
Mozambican Civil Society Within: - UNICEF Mozambique - Home page
Mozambican Civil Society Within: - UNICEF Mozambique - Home page
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Mozambican</strong> <strong>Civil</strong> <strong>Society</strong> <strong>Within</strong>: Evaluation, Challenges, Opportunities and Action<br />
According to Afrobarometer (2003) only a quarter of the <strong>Mozambican</strong> population believes that<br />
its elected representatives are concerned about resolving the people’s problems (24%) or hearing<br />
their opinions (26%). However, 58% of <strong>Mozambican</strong>s believe in the state’s capacity to resolve<br />
the general problems of the people. <strong>Mozambican</strong>s express different levels of satisfaction with<br />
the government’s performance for different areas. There is positive performance in education<br />
(66%), improvements in the health system (58%) and in conflict resolution (52%). There is<br />
relative satisfaction with efforts to fight AIDS (45%).<br />
However, <strong>Mozambican</strong>s are more critical about economic performance. Less than a quarter of<br />
the people interviewed believe that the government has made an effort to create jobs (23%),<br />
control prices (22%) or reduce social inequality (20%). It should be recalled, with reference to<br />
figure 2.2.3, that the effectiveness of the government of <strong>Mozambique</strong> is classified as 44%<br />
compared to 74% for effectiveness of the government of Botswana.<br />
3.2.1.6 Decentralisation<br />
The decentralisation challenge has two dimensions: one related to the citizen’s decision-making<br />
power and the other related to access to public resources. In both cases the degree of<br />
decentralisation is weak and embryonic. There is a lot of talk about decentralisation and citizen<br />
participation, but in practice mechanisms for effective access are weak. This observation is<br />
clearly illustrated by the two charts in figure 3.2.3.<br />
The first chart shows the proportion of direct citizen power compared to the delegated power of<br />
political parties. Direct power is understood as the group of state bodies and legislative power<br />
where the citizen has the power of direct vote. For example, <strong>Mozambican</strong>s vote directly for the<br />
President of the Republic, and for the Mayors of a third of the districts of <strong>Mozambique</strong> (33<br />
municipality mayors).<br />
Figure 3.2.3: Depiction of Citizen Decision Making Power and Distribution of<br />
Public Budget Expenditure, <strong>Mozambique</strong> 2007<br />
Figure 3.2.3a: Citizen’s Direct Power and<br />
Delegated Powers<br />
Figure 3.2.3b:Current Expenditure and Investment by<br />
Decision Making Capacity, <strong>Mozambique</strong> 2007<br />
Direct Power<br />
4%<br />
Power<br />
delegated<br />
to parties 96%<br />
Central<br />
67%<br />
Provincial<br />
30%<br />
District<br />
3%<br />
Source: Francisco, 2007a<br />
Source: Francisco, 2007b<br />
50<br />
<strong>Civil</strong> <strong>Society</strong> Index, <strong>Mozambique</strong> 2007