29.11.2014 Views

Mozambican Civil Society Within: - UNICEF Mozambique - Home page

Mozambican Civil Society Within: - UNICEF Mozambique - Home page

Mozambican Civil Society Within: - UNICEF Mozambique - Home page

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Mozambican</strong> <strong>Civil</strong> <strong>Society</strong> <strong>Within</strong>: Evaluation, Challenges, Opportunities and Action<br />

According to Afrobarometer (2003) only a quarter of the <strong>Mozambican</strong> population believes that<br />

its elected representatives are concerned about resolving the people’s problems (24%) or hearing<br />

their opinions (26%). However, 58% of <strong>Mozambican</strong>s believe in the state’s capacity to resolve<br />

the general problems of the people. <strong>Mozambican</strong>s express different levels of satisfaction with<br />

the government’s performance for different areas. There is positive performance in education<br />

(66%), improvements in the health system (58%) and in conflict resolution (52%). There is<br />

relative satisfaction with efforts to fight AIDS (45%).<br />

However, <strong>Mozambican</strong>s are more critical about economic performance. Less than a quarter of<br />

the people interviewed believe that the government has made an effort to create jobs (23%),<br />

control prices (22%) or reduce social inequality (20%). It should be recalled, with reference to<br />

figure 2.2.3, that the effectiveness of the government of <strong>Mozambique</strong> is classified as 44%<br />

compared to 74% for effectiveness of the government of Botswana.<br />

3.2.1.6 Decentralisation<br />

The decentralisation challenge has two dimensions: one related to the citizen’s decision-making<br />

power and the other related to access to public resources. In both cases the degree of<br />

decentralisation is weak and embryonic. There is a lot of talk about decentralisation and citizen<br />

participation, but in practice mechanisms for effective access are weak. This observation is<br />

clearly illustrated by the two charts in figure 3.2.3.<br />

The first chart shows the proportion of direct citizen power compared to the delegated power of<br />

political parties. Direct power is understood as the group of state bodies and legislative power<br />

where the citizen has the power of direct vote. For example, <strong>Mozambican</strong>s vote directly for the<br />

President of the Republic, and for the Mayors of a third of the districts of <strong>Mozambique</strong> (33<br />

municipality mayors).<br />

Figure 3.2.3: Depiction of Citizen Decision Making Power and Distribution of<br />

Public Budget Expenditure, <strong>Mozambique</strong> 2007<br />

Figure 3.2.3a: Citizen’s Direct Power and<br />

Delegated Powers<br />

Figure 3.2.3b:Current Expenditure and Investment by<br />

Decision Making Capacity, <strong>Mozambique</strong> 2007<br />

Direct Power<br />

4%<br />

Power<br />

delegated<br />

to parties 96%<br />

Central<br />

67%<br />

Provincial<br />

30%<br />

District<br />

3%<br />

Source: Francisco, 2007a<br />

Source: Francisco, 2007b<br />

50<br />

<strong>Civil</strong> <strong>Society</strong> Index, <strong>Mozambique</strong> 2007

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!