Mozambican Civil Society Within: - UNICEF Mozambique - Home page

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Mozambican Civil Society Within: Evaluation, Challenges, Opportunities and Action Figure 3.1.5: Effectiveness of CSO Networks and Federations Effectiveness of Umbrella bodies 50 40 43.4% Percent 30 20 22.8% 18.5% 10 8.5% 4.3% 2.8% 0 Reasonably effective Effective Generally effective Reasonably ineffective Largely ineffective Completely ineffective Other analysts, on the other hand, are more sceptical and critical about the success of such networks. Hodges and Tibana (2005) for example, and Francisco and Matter (2007) argue that the success and performance of civil society networks must be evaluated with caution and in close association with the role played by donors and international agencies. These analysts argue that this is particularly important when one knows that the space conquered by civil society is more the result of imposition by international donors, to whom the Government is accountable, than initiatives and affirmation by the CSOs themselves (Hodges and Tibana, 2005). 3.1.4.3 Self-regulation This indicator evaluates CSO dynamics in generating self-regulation mechanisms and their effectiveness in detecting and overcoming eventual irregularities. In the INC07 about 38% of respondents felt that there are preliminary efforts to generate self regulation mechanisms, while 29% said that the few mechanisms that exist have “extremely limited” impact. Various other sources, especially in the analysis during consultations with stakeholders, felt that ad hoc methods, informality and immediatism undermine internal organisation and the potential for CSO impact on society. 36 Civil Society Index, Mozambique 2007
Mozambican Civil Society Within: Evaluation, Challenges, Opportunities and Action Figure 3.1.6: Self-Regulation of CSOs self-regulations efforts 40 Percent 30 20 37.7% 28.9% 10 21.0% 12.5% 0 Effective mechanisms with impact Some mechanisms, but limited impact Preliminary efforts no efforts 3.3.1.4.4 Support infrastructure Support infrastructure is considered to be very limited. Infrastructure means resource centres, organizational capacity, information data banks and technical assistance programs throughout the country. The INOSC07 shows that 58% of respondents felt that support infrastructure is very limited, 20% spoke of the complete absence of infrastructure and only 5% felt that there was a welldeveloped organizational infrastructure. Figure 3.1.7: System of support infra-structure for CSOs CSO support infrastructure 60 58.1% 50 Percent 40 30 20.1% 20 16.4% 10 0.2% 5.2% 0 other Well-develop infrastructure Expanding infrastructure Limited infrastructure No infrastructure Civil Society Index, Mozambique 2007 37
Page 1 and 2:
Mozambican Civil Society Within: Ev
Page 3 and 4:
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20: Mozambican Civil Society Within: Ev
Page 69: Mozambican Civil Society Within: Ev
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
show all

Mozambican Civil Society Within: - UNICEF Mozambique - Home page

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?