01.12.2014 Views

Barley for Food and Health: Science, Technology, and Products

Barley for Food and Health: Science, Technology, and Products

Barley for Food and Health: Science, Technology, and Products

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

116 BARLEY PROCESSING: METHODS AND PRODUCT COMPOSITION<br />

malt may be employed that is capable of maximum conversion of starch in the<br />

adjunct. Acetic acid bacteria such as Acetobacter aceti are used to oxidize ethanol<br />

to acetic acid. Specifications applied to malt <strong>for</strong> vinegar manufacture relate to<br />

yield of soluble material <strong>and</strong> yield of fermentable material. The use of malt-based<br />

ingredients in foods is discussed briefly in Chapter 7.<br />

The effect of modification on nutrient composition in hulless <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

malting barley is described in Table 5.5 (Bhatty 1996). The absolute values shown<br />

<strong>for</strong> protein <strong>and</strong> starch are not indicative of the substantial enzymatic hydrolysis<br />

that occurs to these nutrients. Bhatty (1996) suggested that this abnormality was<br />

due to the analytical procedures used to measure these components. The average<br />

increases shown in soluble carbohydrates (3.5 to 10.3%, soluble protein (2.8 to<br />

4.4%), <strong>and</strong> reducing sugars (0.3 to 3.1%) <strong>and</strong> decreases in β-glucans (4.7 to 1.5%)<br />

<strong>and</strong> viscosity (26.8 to 1.7 cP) present a truer indication of the hydrolytic activity<br />

occurring during modification. The soluble/total protein (S/T) ratio, known as<br />

the Kolbach index, is a measure of proteolysis. The higher the S/T ratio, the<br />

more extensive is the breakdown of protein. The lower β-glucan content was<br />

largely responsible <strong>for</strong> the greatly reduced viscosity. The major increases seen in<br />

α-amylase (ceralpha units), diastatic power, β-glucanase, <strong>and</strong> proteolytic activity<br />

are directly responsible <strong>for</strong> the changes. In comparing the hulless barley to the<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ard hulled malting barley, the major composition differences noted were in<br />

higher levels of α-amylase <strong>and</strong> diastatic power in the st<strong>and</strong>ard barley, but higher<br />

levels of β-glucanase in the hulless barley. Proteolytic activity was not greatly<br />

different between the two barley genotypes. Caution should be exercised in this<br />

area, due to the limited data available.<br />

Lipid constituents <strong>and</strong> their influence on the malting process <strong>and</strong> malt have not<br />

been investigated as extensively as have carbohydrates <strong>and</strong> protein. Kaukovirta-<br />

Norja et al. (1997) reported total lipids, including internal starch lipids, to be<br />

about 3.7% in the intact kernel prior to malting <strong>and</strong> about 3.3% in the resulting<br />

TABLE 5.5 Effect of Malting on the Composition, Viscosity, <strong>and</strong> Enzymatic<br />

Activity of Hulled <strong>and</strong> Hulless <strong>Barley</strong>, Dry Matter Basis<br />

Hulled <strong>Barley</strong><br />

Hulless <strong>Barley</strong><br />

Item Unmalted Malted Unmalted Malted<br />

Protein (%) 15.3 13.7 16.0 15.7<br />

Ash (%) 2.4 2.2 1.8 1.4<br />

Starch (%) 61.4 62.8 64.4 62.9<br />

β-Glucan (%) 4.4 1.2 4.9 1.8<br />

Viscosity (cP) 20.2 1.6 33.3 1.7<br />

α-Amylase (ceralpha units/g) 0.1 258.4 0.1 288.0<br />

Diastic power ( ◦ ASBC) 71.0 189.5 113.2 147.5<br />

β-Glucanase (U/kg) 0 583.0 0 502.0<br />

Proteolytic activity (mg NPN/kg) 42.0 112.0 46.0 105.0<br />

Source: Bhatty (1996).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!