The 213th Annual Council - Diocese of Virginia
The 213th Annual Council - Diocese of Virginia
The 213th Annual Council - Diocese of Virginia
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Proceedings<br />
updated pledges, changes in the asking for <strong>The</strong> <strong>Virginia</strong> Episcopalian approved by the<br />
Executive Board and revised estimates <strong>of</strong> restricted income. We then made adjustments<br />
to the expense line items to assure we had a balanced budget. We needed to make about<br />
$70,000 worth <strong>of</strong> cuts to the various line items in the budget, but increases in income,<br />
in the income line estimates, reduced us to about $66,000. Recall that the need for the<br />
adjustment was due to the fact that the proposed budget approved by the Executive<br />
Board in December did not include the $70,000 in interest expenses in the expense totals.<br />
We considered not only the requests for each line item, but also the ability to access other<br />
funds, and funds available from other sources and funds remaining from prior year<br />
operations for those line items. As I stated earlier, we also considered your pleas and<br />
comments from the hearing last night.<br />
Next I will highlight the adjustments we made, but first I would like to introduce the<br />
members <strong>of</strong> the Budget Committee. I ask the Committee members to please take one step<br />
forward as I call your name: Bill Fetsch, Daniel Robayo, Don O’Connell, Doug Geddes,<br />
John Baker, Kirk Gibson, Roy Barksdale and Anna Lou Flynn. And those who could not<br />
be present due to illness or other commitments: Don Cady, Carol Burroughs and Laura<br />
Inscoe. And I would be remiss not to thank very much the staff members <strong>of</strong> this <strong>Diocese</strong><br />
for their tremendous help and support during this process.<br />
Now let us look at the budget as proposed by the Committee. I would remind you<br />
that the detailed explanation <strong>of</strong> each line item is available online in a document we<br />
call the narrative budget. That should answer many questions about what each line<br />
item represents. Mike [Kerr] also provided some additional explanations in his report<br />
yesterday and at the hearing last night.<br />
Please turn to the budget document as distributed this morning that is on your table. If<br />
you do not have those documents, please raise your hand and diocesan staff members or<br />
a PYM member will try to bring you additional copies.<br />
<strong>The</strong> income side <strong>of</strong> the budget is based on parish pledges and other items shown. Based<br />
on pledges received to date, we made an adjustment downward for income line A from<br />
the December proposal. This is <strong>of</strong>fset by an upward adjustment in line C for increased<br />
asking for <strong>The</strong> <strong>Virginia</strong> Episcopalian. We also adjusted expected income for restricted<br />
funds, and that’s in line E, and that adjustment is up. This gives us an estimated total<br />
income for 2008 for $4,794,764.<br />
Now, for the expenses. While I will not walk you through all line items <strong>of</strong> the budget, I<br />
will summarize the changes we made to specific categories to achieve a balanced budget.<br />
In fact, we adjusted more than 30 individual line items to achieve this balanced budget.<br />
In category A, that remains the same because that is based on a formula, and based on<br />
last year’s plotted income. Category B, ecumenical partnerships, yes, we had to cut some<br />
items, trying to be sensitive to the needs <strong>of</strong> all areas <strong>of</strong> the budget, trying to share the<br />
pain equitably. I’ll remind you that our giving through budget is but a part <strong>of</strong> a larger<br />
budget for the many ministries we support. <strong>The</strong> total adjustment here was $5,100, or<br />
about 5 percent. Category C, support for youth and young adult ministry, was adjusted<br />
by $7,490, or a little less than 3 percent <strong>of</strong> the original proposal. Category D, missions and<br />
church planting, was adjusted downward by $7,000, or about 1 percent <strong>of</strong> the Executive<br />
Board proposal. Category E, programs and committees, was adjusted downward by<br />
$4,750 or about 6 percent. Category F, canonical ministries and bishop’s commissions, was<br />
adjusted downward by $20,681. Most <strong>of</strong> this adjustment was in line 10, Commission on<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Standards, whose role has been assumed by the Committee on Continuing<br />
116<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Diocese</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Virginia</strong> t Journal <strong>of</strong> the the 213 th <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Council</strong>