25.12.2014 Views

The 213th Annual Council - Diocese of Virginia

The 213th Annual Council - Diocese of Virginia

The 213th Annual Council - Diocese of Virginia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Annual</strong> Reports<br />

approving individuals for Candidacy. We interviewed and approved 10 men and women<br />

for Candidacy. We approved 12 for ordination to the diaconate. We approved 13 persons<br />

for ordination to the priesthood.<br />

It is also the duty <strong>of</strong> the Standing Committee, at the request <strong>of</strong> the bishop, to determine<br />

when a priest or deacon has abandoned the communion <strong>of</strong> the Episcopal Church. In<br />

2007, we determined that 24 had done so—22 in January 2007 and 2 later in the year. Six<br />

months after an inhibition has been issued by the bishop, if the cleric has not made a<br />

good faith retraction in writing to the Bishop, the Standing Committee will determine<br />

whether to consent to the cleric’s removal from the ordained ministry <strong>of</strong> the Episcopal<br />

Church. With enormous regret, the Standing Committee recommended the removal <strong>of</strong><br />

22 priests in 2007. We are grateful that one priest made a good faith retraction and had<br />

his inhibition lifted. Additionally, we accepted the renunciation <strong>of</strong> orders from one priest<br />

living outside <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Diocese</strong>.<br />

By diocesan Canon, the Standing Committee serves as the Title IV Diocesan Review<br />

Committee when needed. When a priest or deacon is accused <strong>of</strong> a triable <strong>of</strong>fense<br />

under Title IV, Canon 1, the Diocesan Review Committee is charged with determining<br />

whether to bring a presentment against the priest or deacon. In 2007, the Standing<br />

Committee served as the Diocesan Review Committee in response to an allegation. In<br />

this case, the Diocesan Review Committee charged the church attorney to investigate<br />

the allegation and prepare a report. <strong>The</strong> investigation did not result in a presentment.<br />

In particular, we wish to thank Scott Caulkins for his excellent, thorough service as<br />

an investigating church attorney this year. Following the conclusion <strong>of</strong> the matter,<br />

the Standing Committee recognized that there may be an opportunity to clarify the<br />

process going forward by having a Diocesan Review Committee independent <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Standing Committee, which is permitted by the national Canons. This would require<br />

an amendment <strong>of</strong> diocesan Canons; we expect that next year’s Standing Committee will<br />

address this issue and bring a recommendation to the 214 th <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

While difficult matters cannot be ignored, we do well to take time and appreciate the<br />

many grace-filled moments in our common life. One such moment came for me when in<br />

June when I represented the Standing Committee at a meeting <strong>of</strong> the leadership <strong>of</strong> our<br />

continuing congregations. I was struck by the faith, hope and joy evident in those who<br />

know that God is with them and that they have a mission to fulfill. Other members <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Committee have also meet with the leadership <strong>of</strong> the continuing congregations <strong>of</strong> <strong>The</strong><br />

Falls Church, St. Stephen’s, Heathsville, St. Margaret’s, Woodbridge and the Church <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Epiphany, Herndon. <strong>The</strong> Standing Committee supports their ministry whole-heartedly<br />

and will continue to assist when called upon to do so.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Standing Committee supports the churches <strong>of</strong> our <strong>Diocese</strong> by assisting them when<br />

they seek consent for indebtedness for the advancement <strong>of</strong> their ministry. In 2007, we<br />

consented to the requests <strong>of</strong> three churches to encumber the property held in trust for<br />

the <strong>Diocese</strong> by taking on debt. Churches go through a lengthy process in preparation for<br />

application to the Standing Committee. We have the joy <strong>of</strong> hearing their presentations,<br />

which are filled with accounts <strong>of</strong> God’s grace.<br />

In the area <strong>of</strong> work pertaining to the wider Church, we <strong>of</strong>fered a response to the Draft<br />

Anglican Covenant. We granted our consent to ordination and consecration <strong>of</strong> 12 bishops<br />

and we granted consent to the holding <strong>of</strong> Episcopal elections in three dioceses. Given<br />

the times in which we live, when asked to reconsider our vote to withhold consent to<br />

the ordination and consecration <strong>of</strong> the Very Rev. Mark Lawrence to be bishop <strong>of</strong> South<br />

146<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Diocese</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Virginia</strong> t Journal <strong>of</strong> the the 213 th <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Council</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!