25.12.2014 Views

book of abstracts - IM2NP

book of abstracts - IM2NP

book of abstracts - IM2NP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A B S T R A C T S TUESDAY, JUNE 29 N A N O S E A 2 0 1 0<br />

3 – Conclusion<br />

For potential devices it is important that island properties do not vary at all across the fields. In this work we<br />

will show how by carefully adjusting the growth parameters on fields as small as 200x200 µm2 it is feasible<br />

to obtain a highly uniform quantum dot size distribution across the entire field, including the border regions.<br />

9H50-10H10<br />

Characteristic interaction distance between Si nanodots and Er3+ ions in welldefined<br />

multilayer films.<br />

Ying-Wei Lu1, M. Christian Petersen1, J. Lundsgaard Hansen,1 A. Nylandsted<br />

Larsen1, R. V. Skougaard Jensen2, T. Garm Pedersen2, K. Pedersen2 (1. Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Physics and Astronomy, University <strong>of</strong> Aarhus, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark; 2. Department <strong>of</strong> Physics and<br />

Nanotechnology, Aalborg University, DK-9220 Aalborg Ø, Denmark) ylu@phys.au.dk, mcp@phys.au.dk,<br />

johnlh@phys.au.dk, anl@phys.au.dk rj@nano.aau.dk, tgp@nano.aau.dk, kp@nano.aau.dk<br />

1 – Introduction<br />

Er3+ photoluminescence (PL) sensitized by amorphous or crystalline Si nanodots has attracted intensive<br />

attention since Si nanodots can enhance Er3+ emission due to interaction between carriers in Si nanodots and<br />

Er3+ ions. However, the nature <strong>of</strong> the sensitizing role played by the Si nanodots is still being debated.<br />

Several groups have studied the characteristic interaction distance between Si nanodots and Er3+ ions. In<br />

these studies, however, the films were annealed at high temperatures which might result in Er diffusion, and<br />

accordingly, induce a distribution in interaction distance due to ill-defined microstructures. Therefore, low<br />

temperature annealed films with well-defined microstructure are better candidates for the characterization <strong>of</strong><br />

the interaction distance since Er diffusion can be completely avoided.<br />

2 – Abstract<br />

10 layers each consisting <strong>of</strong> a-Si/SiO2:Er/SiO2 sublayers were deposited on p-type, (001) Si wafers by rfmagnetron<br />

sputtering without substrate heating. The thickness <strong>of</strong> the a-Si sublayers were fixed at about 3 nm.<br />

The thickness <strong>of</strong> the SiO2:Er and pure SiO2 sublayers were varied such that the SiO2:Er sublayer thickness<br />

increased from 0 to 5 nm, while the pure SiO2 sublayer thickness decreased accordingly to keep the<br />

thickness <strong>of</strong> the total SiO2 layer fixed at 15 nm. After deposition, all films were annealed at 500 °C for 1 h in<br />

95% N2 + 5% H2 and at 1100 °C for 1 h in pure N2, respectively. Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (SIMS)<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>iles indicate that Er diffusion takes place in the films annealed at high temperature but not in those<br />

annealed at low temperature. Moreover, PL measurements show that different characteristicinteraction<br />

distances are extracted from the films annealed at different temperatures. Transmission electron microscopy<br />

(TEM) and time-resolved PL spectroscopy have been employed to characterize the relationship between the<br />

well- and ill-defined microstructures, and the different interaction models.<br />

3 – Conclusion<br />

The present investigation demonstrates that the characteristic interaction distance between Si nanodots and<br />

Er3+ ions strongly depends on the annealing temperature <strong>of</strong> the films. At high annealing temperature the Er<br />

starts to diffuse within the SiO2 layer making it impossible to operate with one interaction distance.<br />

51

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!