27.12.2014 Views

Corporate Tax 2010 - BMR Advisors

Corporate Tax 2010 - BMR Advisors

Corporate Tax 2010 - BMR Advisors

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Slaughter and May<br />

United Kingdom<br />

3.5 If so, is there a “safe harbour” by reference to which tax<br />

relief is assured<br />

There are no statutory safe harbour rules. In <strong>Tax</strong> Bulletin 17 of<br />

1995, however, the Inland Revenue, as they were then called,<br />

explained their practice of accepting that where a loan otherwise<br />

meets the arm’s length test, a company will not be thinly capitalised<br />

where:<br />

the level of debt to equity does not exceed a ratio of 1:1; and<br />

its income to interest cover is at least 3:1.<br />

The <strong>Tax</strong> Bulletin emphasised, however, that there are no hard and<br />

fast rules in this area and that each case has to be considered on its<br />

own facts. This is reaffirmed in the International Manual at<br />

INTM579040.<br />

3.6 Would any such “thin capitalisation” rules extend to debt<br />

advanced by a third party but guaranteed by a parent<br />

company<br />

received by a UK company will now, subject to some exceptions,<br />

be exempt from corporation tax.) For more details about the<br />

taxation of dividends see Chapter 1 by Graham Airs.<br />

3.8 Does the United Kingdom have transfer pricing rules<br />

Yes. Since 1 April 2004, the transfer pricing rules have applied to<br />

both cross-border and domestic transactions between associated<br />

companies.<br />

If HMRC do not accept that pricing is arm’s length they will raise<br />

an assessment adjusting the profits or losses accordingly. It is<br />

possible to make an application to HMRC for an advance pricing<br />

agreement which has the effect that pricing in accordance with its<br />

terms is treated as arm’s length.<br />

In cross-border transactions the double taxation caused by a transfer<br />

pricing adjustment can be mitigated by the provisions of a tax<br />

treaty.<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Yes. A company may be thinly capitalised because of a special<br />

relationship between the borrower and the lender or because of a<br />

guarantee given by a person connected with the borrower. The UK<br />

legislation contains a wide definition of the word “guarantee” and<br />

includes any case in which the lender has a real expectation that he<br />

will be paid by, or out of the assets of, another connected company.<br />

There is no requirement for a guarantee to be in writing.<br />

The legislation gives a compensating adjustment to a guarantor in<br />

circumstances where interest has been disallowed because of the<br />

guarantee. The effect of the rule is to treat the guarantor as if the<br />

guarantor had taken the loan and paid the interest instead of the<br />

actual borrower. The guarantor will obtain a tax deduction for the<br />

interest provided it meets the usual conditions for an interest<br />

deduction. The effect where the borrower and the guarantor are<br />

both subject to UK tax is, therefore, neutral.<br />

3.7 Are there any restrictions on tax relief for interest<br />

payments by a local company to a non-resident in addition<br />

to any thin capitalisation rules mentioned in questions<br />

3.4-3.6 above<br />

The Finance Act 2009 has introduced, with effect for accounting<br />

periods beginning on or after 1 January <strong>2010</strong>, a further restriction<br />

on tax relief for finance expenses of groups of companies in certain<br />

circumstances. The new “worldwide debt cap”, as it is known,<br />

limits the aggregate UK tax deduction for the UK members of a<br />

group that have net finance expenses to the worldwide consolidated<br />

gross finance expense of that group. The intention behind the new<br />

legislation is to prevent groups “dumping” debt in the UK in order<br />

to achieve a UK tax deduction.<br />

The complex legislation contains a “gateway test” which is<br />

intended to be more simple to apply than the full regime. The<br />

gateway test simply compares the aggregate of the average net debt<br />

of each UK company for an accounting period with the average<br />

worldwide gross debt income. If the aggregate UK net debt does<br />

not exceed 75% of the worldwide gross debt then the debt cap<br />

provisions need not be considered further.<br />

Financial services groups fall outside the new rules if certain<br />

conditions are met.<br />

The worldwide debt cap is intended to pay, in part, for the tax<br />

exemption for foreign dividend income which has been introduced<br />

by the Finance Act 2009. (Prior to the Finance Act 2009, dividends<br />

received by a UK company from another UK company were<br />

exempt from tax but foreign dividends were taxable. All dividends<br />

ICLG TO: CORPORATE TAX <strong>2010</strong><br />

© Published and reproduced with kind permission by Global Legal Group Ltd, London<br />

4 <strong>Tax</strong> on Business Operations: General<br />

4.1 What is the headline rate of tax on corporate profits<br />

The headline rate of tax is currently 28%.<br />

4.2 When is that tax generally payable<br />

For companies other than “large” companies, corporation tax is due<br />

and payable nine months after the end of the accounting period for<br />

tax purposes.<br />

Large companies are generally companies with profits in the<br />

accounting period in question in excess of £1.5m, but this £1.5m<br />

threshold is proportionately reduced if there are associated<br />

companies or the accounting period is less than 12 months. Large<br />

companies have to pay corporation tax in quarterly instalments<br />

based on an estimate of the tax they are likely to pay. The first<br />

instalment payment is due 6 months and 13 days from the start of<br />

the accounting period and the last instalment (which will be the<br />

balance of the corporation tax liability) is due 3 months and 14 days<br />

from the end of the accounting period.<br />

4.3 What is the tax base for that tax (profits pursuant to<br />

commercial accounts subject to adjustments; other tax<br />

base)<br />

In general terms, the tax follows the commercial accounts subject to<br />

adjustments.<br />

4.4 If it otherwise differs from the profit shown in commercial<br />

accounts, what are the main other differences<br />

Certain items of expenditure which are shown as reducing the<br />

profits in the commercial accounts are added back for tax purposes<br />

and deductions for tax purposes may then be allowable. For<br />

example, in the case of depreciable plant or machinery, capital<br />

allowances on a reducing balance basis at various rates depending<br />

on the type of asset and the level of expenditure incurred) are<br />

substituted for accounting depreciation.<br />

The UK tax legislation has been amended to deal with various<br />

issues arising from companies adopting International Accounting<br />

Standards to draw up commercial accounts for accounting periods<br />

beginning on or after 1 January 2005 and in certain circumstances,<br />

WWW.ICLG.CO.UK 261

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!