27.12.2014 Views

Corporate Tax 2010 - BMR Advisors

Corporate Tax 2010 - BMR Advisors

Corporate Tax 2010 - BMR Advisors

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP<br />

USA<br />

above do not apply to corporations with debt to equity ratios of less<br />

than 1.5 to 1. The limitations on corporate acquisition indebtedness<br />

described above do not apply to corporations with debt to equity<br />

ratios of less than 2 to 1.<br />

3.6 Would any such “thin capitalisation” rules extend to debt<br />

advanced by a third party but guaranteed by a parent<br />

company<br />

If a foreign parent guarantees third-party debt of a thinly capitalised<br />

U.S. subsidiary, the IRS may assert that in substance the loan was<br />

actually made to the foreign parent and that the foreign parent<br />

advanced the funds to its U.S. subsidiary as an equity contribution.<br />

In this situation, any payments by the U.S. subsidiary to the thirdparty<br />

lender would be recharacterised as dividends to the foreign<br />

parent. Additionally, a guarantee by a foreign parent may trigger<br />

application of the earnings stripping rules discussed in question 3.4<br />

even though the lender is unrelated to the U.S. subsidiary.<br />

3.7 Are there any restrictions on tax relief for interest<br />

payments by a local company to a non-resident in addition<br />

to any thin capitalisation rules mentioned in questions<br />

3.4-3.6 above<br />

Other than the restrictions on the portfolio interest exemption<br />

discussed in question 3.3, there generally are no other restrictions<br />

on tax relief for interest payments by a local company to a nonresident.<br />

3.8 Does the United States have transfer pricing rules<br />

Yes. U.S. transfer pricing rules allow the IRS to apportion income,<br />

deductions, credits, or allowances from cross-border transactions<br />

among related entities if it determines that such apportionment is<br />

necessary in order to prevent evasion of taxes or to reflect income<br />

clearly. These rules may apply to transfers of services, tangible<br />

property or intangible property. Large multinational companies<br />

with significant operations in the U.S. often engage experts to<br />

review their transfer price arrangements to ensure compliance with<br />

U.S. law.<br />

4.3 What is the tax base for that tax (profits pursuant to<br />

commercial accounts subject to adjustments; other tax<br />

base)<br />

The United States has a parallel but separate system of tax<br />

accounting for determining a corporation’s tax base that is distinct<br />

from other regimes that may apply for commercial, financial or<br />

statutory purposes. This system is set out in the Internal Revenue<br />

Code. Under this system, a corporation must first calculate its gross<br />

income, which includes income from services, sales of inventory<br />

(minus cost of goods sold), dividends, royalties, interest, rent and<br />

other income. Gross income also includes capital gains from sales<br />

of property. From gross income, a corporation computes its taxable<br />

income by subtracting various deductions for costs incurred in its<br />

business such as wages, depreciation, rents, interest and other<br />

ordinary and necessary business expenses.<br />

4.4 If it otherwise differs from the profit shown in commercial<br />

accounts, what are the main other differences<br />

Although United States generally accepted accounting principles,<br />

referred to as GAAP, and tax accounting are similar in many respects,<br />

they differ in a few important ways. GAAP generally polices a<br />

reporting company’s incentive to accelerate revenue and defer<br />

expenses, while tax accounting polices a company’s incentive to defer<br />

income and accelerate expenses. In many cases, differences between<br />

the two systems can be traced to these competing biases.<br />

GAAP and tax accounting differ, for example, in the treatment of<br />

prepaid or contingent income and expenses. Under GAAP, income<br />

is recognised over the period to which it relates, and if a payment is<br />

received before it is earned it is held in suspense as deferred<br />

revenue. For tax purposes, income is generally recognised upon the<br />

earlier of the date of receipt or the date on which it is earned.<br />

GAAP recognises expenses in the period to which such expenses<br />

are economically attributable and often provides for the recognition<br />

of unpaid estimated expenses through reserves. By contrast, for tax<br />

purposes business expenses cannot be deducted until the amount<br />

can be determined with reasonable accuracy, all events have<br />

occurred that fix the fact of the liability and economic performance<br />

has occurred. As a result, reserves for estimated expenses are<br />

generally not deductible in computing taxable income.<br />

USA<br />

4 <strong>Tax</strong> on Business Operations: General<br />

4.1 What is the headline rate of tax on corporate profits<br />

The top federal tax rate for corporations is 35%. Most states and<br />

some local governments also impose income or similar taxes on<br />

corporate earnings.<br />

4.2 When is that tax generally payable<br />

A corporation’s tax year must match the annual period it uses for its<br />

commercial books and records, which can either be a calendar year<br />

or a fiscal year. Estimated tax payments are due quarterly. A<br />

corporation’s final tax return and the payment of its remaining tax<br />

liability is due on the 15th day of the 3rd month after the end of its<br />

tax year (March 15 for a calendar year corporation), although a 6-<br />

month extension is available with interest on any unpaid tax<br />

liability.<br />

ICLG TO: CORPORATE TAX <strong>2010</strong><br />

© Published and reproduced with kind permission by Global Legal Group Ltd, London<br />

4.5 Are there any tax grouping rules Do these allow for relief<br />

in the United States for losses of overseas subsidiaries<br />

Yes. In the United States, corporate members of an “affiliated group”<br />

may, and almost always do, elect to file a consolidated Federal income<br />

tax return. An affiliated group is one or more chains of U.S.<br />

corporations where a common parent corporation owns at least 80%<br />

of the stock (by vote and value) of another “includible corporation”,<br />

and one or more “includible corporations” (including the common<br />

parent) own at least 80% of the stock of the next lower tier of<br />

“includible corporations”. Generally speaking, the consolidated<br />

return regime taxes affiliated corporations as if they were a single<br />

taxpayer with respect to transactions with third parties. This provides<br />

affiliated groups with the benefit of being able to use losses from one<br />

affiliate to offset the income of another affiliate. Income and losses on<br />

transactions between affiliates, however, are generally deferred under<br />

complex rules until realised in a transaction outside of the group.<br />

Non-U.S. companies, tax-exempt corporations, and certain other<br />

companies are not includible corporations, so they may not be<br />

members of an affiliated group. Nevertheless, in certain<br />

circumstances the U.S. owner of a non-U.S. company may elect to<br />

treat that company as a pass-through entity for U.S. tax purposes.<br />

WWW.ICLG.CO.UK 267

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!