2007 Issue 1 - New York City Bar Association
2007 Issue 1 - New York City Bar Association
2007 Issue 1 - New York City Bar Association
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
L A W Y E R ’ S R O L E I N C O R P O R A T E G O V E R N A N C E<br />
and risk-management policies, 75 meeting with the outside auditors, 76<br />
“review[ing] with the independent auditor any audit problems or difficulties<br />
and management’s response,” 77 and meeting with the full Board. 78<br />
In addition, all listed companies are required to disclose and adopt corporate<br />
governance guidelines, 79 as well as business conduct and ethics policies.<br />
80 Further “[e]ach listed company CEO must certify to the NYSE each<br />
year that he or she is not aware of any violation by the company of NYSE<br />
corporate governance listing standards, qualifying the certification to the<br />
extent necessary.” 81<br />
D. Auditors<br />
Another important force in play in today’s regulatory and enforcement<br />
landscape is the outside auditor. Whereas the federal government<br />
and market regulators wield carrots and sticks that encourage companies<br />
to cooperate, the independent audit firms have also pushed companies to<br />
self-report problems and conduct internal investigations.<br />
Auditors have a statutory duty to report illegal acts to management<br />
and the Board, and, if necessary, to the SEC. Section 10A(b) of the 1934 Act<br />
establishes a reporting and disclosure framework that outside auditors must<br />
follow when they become aware of information indicating possible wrongdoing.<br />
82 When an auditor first discovers evidence of a suspected violation during<br />
an audit, it must promptly inform management and the Audit Committee. 83<br />
After informing the Audit Committee, if the auditor determines that (1)<br />
the illegal act has a “material effect” on the financial statements, (2) senior<br />
management has not taken, or the Board has not caused management to<br />
take, “appropriate remedial action,” and (3) “the failure to take remedial<br />
action is reasonably expected to warrant departure from a standard report<br />
of the auditor, when made, or warrant resignation from the audit<br />
engagement,” then the auditor must apprise the Board of its conclusions. 84<br />
75. Id. at § 303A.07(c)(iii)(D).<br />
76. Id. at § 303A.07(c)(iii)(E).<br />
77. Id. at§ 303A.07(c)(iii)(F).<br />
78. Id. at § 303A.07(c)(iii)(H).<br />
79. Id. at § 303A.09.<br />
80. Id. at § 303A.10.<br />
81. Id. at § 303A.12.<br />
82. 15 U.S.C. § 78j-1.<br />
83. Id. at § 78j-1(b)(1).<br />
84. Id. at § 78j-1(b)(2).<br />
T H E R E C O R D<br />
224