29.12.2014 Views

Country Programme (2007-2011/2012) evaluation - UNFPA Moldova

Country Programme (2007-2011/2012) evaluation - UNFPA Moldova

Country Programme (2007-2011/2012) evaluation - UNFPA Moldova

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

• Developapositionandclearstrategytoworkwithcivilsocietyasacomplementtonational<br />

programmesandinanefforttoreachmarginalizedpopulations<br />

o Engaging civil society can potentially help to improve outreach and quality of services<br />

faster as well a to better identify vulnerable groups at local level and thus help to achieve<br />

their inclusion<br />

o Additionally, the UNDAF <strong>evaluation</strong> of early <strong>2011</strong> showed that the System of United<br />

Nations as a whole lack a clear and common understanding how civil society should be<br />

addressed in the country and what would be their role in cooperating with UN. A clear<br />

definition of the relationship and roles would help to improve the efficiency and<br />

effectiveness of the cooperation.<br />

• Enhance monitoring and <strong>evaluation</strong> as well as Results Based Management capacities of<br />

implementing partners<br />

o The experience of the monitoring system for commodity security showed clearly the<br />

importance of such a system, as well as the difficulties from government side to<br />

implement such a system without donor support. This is only one example for the lack of<br />

monitoring and RBM.<br />

o The achievement of both of these objectives would help to make the cooperation with<br />

implementing partners more effective and hence increase their potential impact<br />

o Since <strong>UNFPA</strong> <strong>Moldova</strong> depends heavily on non-<strong>UNFPA</strong> resources, an improvement of<br />

these capacities in implementing partners would facilitate fundraising and would make it<br />

more sustainable since a better reporting of achievements would be possible<br />

• Ensure competitive working conditions in the <strong>UNFPA</strong> CO in order to avoid staff turnover<br />

RH component<br />

• Continue supporting commodity security in kind but also with technical support for identifying<br />

correctly vulnerable groups, which receive contraceptives free of charge and with a continuous<br />

advocacy with the GoM regarding their responsibility for commodity security. Currently the share<br />

of responsibility GoM assumes in this field is still small. <strong>UNFPA</strong> should continue supporting the<br />

country until government’s share is big enough, to allow <strong>UNFPA</strong>’s withdraw of without putting<br />

the achieved commodity security at a high risk.<br />

• For capacity building in RH, consider also addressing demand side problems (behavioural<br />

change), especially for vulnerable groups, since only addressing the capacity of service delivery is<br />

not sufficient for influencing all causes of exclusion<br />

<strong>UNFPA</strong> <strong>Moldova</strong> Extended <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Programme</strong> (<strong>2007</strong>-<strong>2011</strong>/12)<br />

Outcome Evaluation<br />

61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!