Migrants, Minorities, Belongings and Citizenship. Glocalization and ...

In order to provide a conceptual standard across the six countries, categorizations of
some respondents in some country reports have been changed in this final report.
Therefore, this report comprises a somewhat different classification of the respondents.
One example is the classification as historical native minorities of the Finn-Swedes who
immigrated into Estonia in their own lifetime. These have now been categorized as
“second country nationals” for Estonia since they have emigrated from another European
Union member state. On the other hand, the changes done for the Estonian respondents
also comprise the aforementioned distinction between the two types of imperial
minorities. Concerning the category extra-territorial, we have also done a minor change
to the classification that has been used in the Hungarian country report. The individual
classifications done in each country report are certainly possible and justifiable on
different grounds. However, as one concern in this report is to provide conceptual and
categorical comparability across contexts, the standard definitions of Glocalmig had to be
used.
Gender representation in the sample
The research frame required a good representation of both genders in the sample. The
qualitative sample comprises 29 male and 33 female respondents. Also in the samples of
the individual countries, the male–female balance is good with the exception of the small
Danish sample that comprises only 3 male respondents.
Figure 3. Gender Percentage by Category
80 Gender
Male
Female
60
40
20
0
65