Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching - National University
Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching - National University
Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching - National University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Read<strong>in</strong>g Practices <strong>in</strong> Elementary Schools:<br />
Format <strong>of</strong> Tasks Teachers Assign<br />
Thomas DeVere Wolsey, Diane Lapp, and Bruce Dow<br />
Abstract<br />
Teachers <strong>of</strong>ten use groups and various read<strong>in</strong>g modalities (for example, <strong>in</strong>dependent read<strong>in</strong>g, guided read<strong>in</strong>g) to<br />
meet the needs <strong>of</strong> students with divergent read<strong>in</strong>g abilities. The study described <strong>in</strong> this article explores the<br />
perceptions <strong>of</strong> teachers as to their group<strong>in</strong>g practices and read<strong>in</strong>g formats when literacy tasks are assigned. The<br />
survey results <strong>in</strong>dicate that teachers <strong>in</strong> the sample tend to value small-group oral read<strong>in</strong>g configurations and partner<br />
work over whole-class or homework activities. Some whole-class oral read<strong>in</strong>g is still used by some teachers.<br />
Key Words<br />
Read<strong>in</strong>g format, group<strong>in</strong>g practices, literacy pedagogy, read<strong>in</strong>g tasks, oral read<strong>in</strong>g, read aloud, silent read<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Introduction<br />
Andreas sat down with a group <strong>of</strong> his third grade classmates to read an article about bully<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />
schools. Yesterday, his teacher read aloud a story on the same topic while the entire class read<br />
along with her. Tomorrow, students will each choose one <strong>of</strong> four additional, topically related<br />
articles <strong>of</strong> vary<strong>in</strong>g levels <strong>of</strong> difficulty to read silently <strong>in</strong> class. But today, the small group <strong>of</strong> four<br />
students are tak<strong>in</strong>g turns read<strong>in</strong>g the article and question<strong>in</strong>g each other about the author’s ma<strong>in</strong><br />
po<strong>in</strong>ts. In Andreas’s class, it is not uncommon to see students engaged <strong>in</strong> a variety <strong>of</strong> read<strong>in</strong>g<br />
activities, depend<strong>in</strong>g on the <strong>in</strong>structional purpose for the read<strong>in</strong>g, the difficulty <strong>of</strong> the text, or the<br />
choices they make about what they want to read. His teacher knows that students learn to read<br />
through deliberate <strong>in</strong>struction and through many opportunities to read. More specifically,<br />
Andreas’s teacher designs <strong>in</strong>struction that supports students ga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the skills needed to read<br />
complex texts, and also texts they are able to read <strong>in</strong>dependently. She believes that for students<br />
to grow as readers, they must have time to read as well as <strong>in</strong>struction that models the strategies<br />
that are used by pr<strong>of</strong>icient readers when read<strong>in</strong>g a wide array <strong>of</strong> texts.<br />
For some time, teachers have been aware that read<strong>in</strong>g pr<strong>of</strong>iciency is <strong>in</strong>dividual and<br />
situational. Read<strong>in</strong>g difficulty has historically been described <strong>in</strong> terms relative to student<br />
capability when read<strong>in</strong>g a given text (Betts, 1946; Treptow, Burns, & McComas, 2007). That is,<br />
some texts are those students can read <strong>in</strong>dependently or with relative ease, while others are so<br />
difficult they produce frustration for the reader, and still others are challeng<strong>in</strong>g but not<br />
overwhelm<strong>in</strong>g. Understand<strong>in</strong>g this array suggests that students need both deliberate <strong>in</strong>struction<br />
and <strong>in</strong>dependent read<strong>in</strong>g time <strong>in</strong> order to grow as readers. In addition to deliberate <strong>in</strong>struction,<br />
the value <strong>of</strong> read<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dependently has been shown to support literacy development (Anderson,<br />
Wilson, & Field<strong>in</strong>g, 1988) for all students, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g English language learners (e.g., Krashen,<br />
1996) and students who struggle with academic read<strong>in</strong>g tasks (e.g., Fader, 1976; Fisher, 2004),<br />
while also promot<strong>in</strong>g a positive school climate (e.g., Wolsey, Lapp, & Fisher, <strong>in</strong> press).<br />
Instructional texts that are challeng<strong>in</strong>g but not overwhelm<strong>in</strong>g are those that require<br />
deliberate <strong>in</strong>struction <strong>in</strong> order to support student learn<strong>in</strong>g as a result <strong>of</strong> the read<strong>in</strong>g task.<br />
Instruction <strong>of</strong>ten <strong>in</strong>volves teach<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formational content, while model<strong>in</strong>g the process <strong>of</strong> read<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
and <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g the nuances associated with different types <strong>of</strong> texts. Because students acquire<br />
read<strong>in</strong>g pr<strong>of</strong>iciency <strong>in</strong> idiosyncratic ways that are overlapp<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong>cremental, a typical<br />
101