Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching - National University

Conclusion
SL learning must be a two-way process, like a two-way maintenance bilingual education model
that requires a SL to be developed simultaneously with maintaining the first language for all non-
English speaking students. So, in promoting bilingualism, society has to be fair and support SL
learning not only for immigrants but also for the local population. Unfortunately, this is not the
case, because it is often influenced by political factors. A society can be peaceful, successful, and
equitable to its members only if it is balanced. Any imbalance, whether caused unintentionally or
deliberately, when dictated by special group interests, leads to the societal imbalance that
immediately creates a tension due to the shift of equilibrium and dooms any promising
progressive initiatives. This must be understood by the governments and by all cultural groups
co-existing in a nation and must be explained to all members of the society. No one can reap a
benefit at the expense of others for a long time; eventually, it will be revoked.
Therefore we can identify four major goals in attaining national balanced bilingualism:
• The concept of balanced, symmetrical bilingualism and bilingual education for all
citizens has to be accepted and become a part of the national social order.
• Schools need to adopt effective instructional methodologies and technologies that ensure
fast and productive SL and FL development.
• The efforts to use existing innovative approaches or design more advanced ones should
be enhanced.
• To implement new learning models, teachers capable of producing tangible outcomes
ought to be prepared. This can be done by updating existing teacher preparation
programs, integrating in them effective FL methodologies, and offering professional
development events conducted by experts in innovative learning.
Integration of the principles and practical recommendations presented here may help
improve SL learning outcomes and reduce the time for developing proficiency, thus producing
both educational and economic effects while helping to more expeditiously integrate immigrants
into society. This would significantly benefit social and intercultural relationships within the
nation.
References
Abu-Rabia, S. (1999). Attitudes and psycholinguistic aspects of first language maintenance among Russian-Jewish
immigrants in Israel. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational
Psychology, 19(2), 133–148.
Arnesen, A., Hadzhitheodoulou-Loizidou, Bîrzéa, P., Essomba, C., Angel, M., & Julie, A. (2009). Policies and
practices for teaching sociocultural diversity: Concepts, principles and challenges in teacher education.
Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg Cedex, France.
Bennett, M. (1998). Basic concepts of intercultural communication. Boston: Intercultural Press.
Bernhardt, E. (1998) Sociohistorical perspectives on language teaching in the modern United States. In H. Byrnes
(Ed.), Learning foreign and SLs: Perspectives in research and scholarship. New York: The Modern Language
Association of America.
Chomksy, N. (1968). Language and mind. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Cummins, J. (1981). Biliteracy, language proficiency, and educational programs. In J. R. Edwards (Ed.), The social
psychology of reading (pp. 131–146). Silver Spring, MD: Institute of Modern Languages. Cummins, J. (2001).
Negotiating identities: Education for empowerment in a diverse society (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: California
Association for Bilingual Education.
133