Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching - National University
Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching - National University
Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching - National University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
language used <strong>in</strong> the description and guidel<strong>in</strong>es for a Q&A Forum assignment <strong>in</strong> an onl<strong>in</strong>e<br />
course.)<br />
Advantages <strong>of</strong> the Q&A Forum<br />
The Q&A Forum is better at achiev<strong>in</strong>g the goal <strong>of</strong> peer <strong>in</strong>teraction and critical discussion than<br />
merely requir<strong>in</strong>g students to post peer comments; it can do everyth<strong>in</strong>g peer comments are meant<br />
to do and more. Deeper engagement with peer work is guaranteed because the ma<strong>in</strong> task <strong>of</strong> the<br />
assignment is to answer another student’s orig<strong>in</strong>al question. S<strong>in</strong>ce students must each answer a<br />
different question, they will not only be eager to read through all <strong>of</strong> the questions to f<strong>in</strong>d one<br />
they want to answer but also be prompt about complet<strong>in</strong>g the assignment, as the sooner they<br />
engage, the greater the selection <strong>of</strong> questions. The last person to post his or her answer will be<br />
left with the f<strong>in</strong>al unanswered question. See<strong>in</strong>g the list <strong>of</strong> available questions visibly dw<strong>in</strong>dle as<br />
the due date draws near creates a real-time <strong>in</strong>dicator <strong>of</strong> students work<strong>in</strong>g together as a class on<br />
the same project. Students enjoy the mildly competitive “race” to answer their preferred<br />
question. If they move precipitously, they will not have the advantage <strong>of</strong> see<strong>in</strong>g the entire list <strong>of</strong><br />
questions; if they wait too long, they may miss their chance to answer the question <strong>of</strong> their<br />
choice. This k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> dynamism is a good way to engage students.<br />
The structure <strong>of</strong> this assignment also stimulates students to pay more attention to what<br />
others <strong>in</strong> the class are do<strong>in</strong>g, because the assignment suggests that the question refer back to one<br />
or more peer posts <strong>in</strong> the previous discussion board; this provides a strong <strong>in</strong>centive to read<br />
through a number, if not all, <strong>of</strong> the previous discussion posts. By contrast, the peer-comment<br />
assignment can be fulfilled by simply read<strong>in</strong>g two other posts <strong>in</strong> order to make two comments;<br />
students are given no real motivation to go beyond this effort. The Q&A Forum assignment gives<br />
students a self-<strong>in</strong>terested reason to read through more <strong>of</strong> their peers’ discussion-board posts:<br />
They will want to craft a relevant and <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g question, so they will be likely to read through<br />
various posts to f<strong>in</strong>d one that helps them come up with good ideas. Also, the suggestion that a<br />
good way to formulate a relevant question is to refer to another student’s discussion-board post<br />
will lead to critical th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g skills kick<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to gear, because the student’s own grade is affected<br />
by successfully us<strong>in</strong>g analysis and creativity <strong>in</strong> relation to the ideas and arguments <strong>of</strong> others.<br />
Koszalka and Ganesan (2004) make the well-supported po<strong>in</strong>t that active peer<br />
collaboration and social <strong>in</strong>teraction on specific <strong>in</strong>structional tasks or course assignments is a<br />
significant factor <strong>in</strong> successful learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> onl<strong>in</strong>e environments (and it can be asserted that the<br />
same holds true for onsite classroom situations). They claim that learn<strong>in</strong>g takes place <strong>in</strong> other<br />
ways than simply tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> and comprehend<strong>in</strong>g new <strong>in</strong>formation. Learn<strong>in</strong>g takes hold when the<br />
needs <strong>of</strong> learners are addressed, and learn<strong>in</strong>g<br />
grows out <strong>of</strong> conversation and shap<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> understand<strong>in</strong>g through <strong>in</strong>teractions with the<br />
content and others <strong>in</strong> the learn<strong>in</strong>g environment. Thus, the <strong>in</strong>structional design focus <strong>of</strong><br />
onl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>struction must be to engage learners purposefully and strategically <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tegrated<br />
<strong>in</strong>teractions with content, activities, peers, and with the <strong>in</strong>structor ultimately facilitat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the learn<strong>in</strong>g process (p. 244).<br />
The Q&A learn<strong>in</strong>g tool advances these specific goals and aims to meet the purposes <strong>of</strong><br />
successful learn<strong>in</strong>g as specified <strong>in</strong> the well-known ARCS model <strong>of</strong> motivational design<br />
167