Notional Field Development Final Report - EBN
Notional Field Development Final Report - EBN
Notional Field Development Final Report - EBN
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>EBN</strong> <strong>Notional</strong> <strong>Field</strong> <strong>Development</strong> Plan<br />
3.2.4 Hydraulic Fracture Summary and Recommendations<br />
Results presented here are the average of two transverse, conductive and producing fractures per stage<br />
in either the DFN or Planar modeling scenario. Although the created DFN lengths are shorter than the<br />
Planar model, the sum of propped dominate primary fractures created by the Discrete Fracture Network<br />
is similar to the propped single fracture created in the Planar models solution. Fracture width and fluid<br />
efficiency in the DFN model is less those solutions in the planar model because the same fluid volume is<br />
being used to create complex fracturing geometry. Comparison of Posidonia and Aalburg fracture<br />
geometries can be found in the<br />
Table 3-8, Comparison Results for DFN and Planar Fracture Geometry (20/40-mesh RC proppant),<br />
Posidonia Shale and Table 3-9, Comparison Results for DFN and Planar Fracture Geometry (20/40-mesh<br />
RC proppant), Aalburg Shale below.<br />
Table 3-8, Comparison Results for DFN and Planar Fracture Geometry (20/40-mesh RC proppant), Posidonia Shale<br />
Planar σ2>> σ3<br />
(average for two fractures)<br />
• Efficiency, h = 90%<br />
• DPnet = 47.5 bar (688 psi)<br />
• hf = 41 m (134 ft)<br />
• xf create = 257.2 m (844 ft)<br />
• xf prop = 172 m (563 ft)<br />
• wf prop = 0.7 cm (0.276 in)<br />
• kfwf = 121.8 mD-m (399.6 mD-ft)<br />
• CfD = 7902<br />
DFN σ2> σ3<br />
(average for two networks)<br />
• Efficiency, h = 75%<br />
• DPnet = 45.3 bar (657 psi)<br />
• hf = 39 m (128 ft)<br />
• xf create = 205.2 m (673 ft)<br />
• xf prop = 152 m (500 ft)<br />
• wf prop = 0.32 cm (0.12 in)<br />
• kfwf = 56.3 mD-m (184.7 mD-ft)<br />
• CfD = 7390<br />
• Network Width: ~35 m (~115 ft)<br />
Table 3-9, Comparison Results for DFN and Planar Fracture Geometry (20/40-mesh RC proppant), Aalburg Shale<br />
Planar σ2>> σ3<br />
(average for two fractures)<br />
• Efficiency, h = 88%<br />
• DPnet = 88 bar (1278 psi)<br />
• hf = 30.8 m (101 ft)<br />
• xf create = 357.1 m (1172 ft)<br />
• xf prop = 228.4 m (749 ft)<br />
• wf prop = 0.16 cm (0.06 in)<br />
• kfwf = 25.97 mD-m (85.2 mD-ft)<br />
• CfD = 1137<br />
DFN σ2> σ3<br />
(average for two networks)<br />
• Efficiency, h = 69%<br />
• DPnet = 95.2 bar (1380 psi)<br />
• hf = 23.4 m (77 ft)<br />
• xf create = 257 m (843 ft)<br />
• xf prop = 176.4 m (579 ft)<br />
• wf prop = 0.06 cm (0.03 in)<br />
• kfwf = 10.7 mD-m (35 mD-ft)<br />
• CfD = 1208<br />
• Network Width: 40 m (131 ft)<br />
© 2011 Halliburton All Rights Reserved<br />
38