eu-com-schengen-coop

More documents

Recommendations

Info

EUROPEAN UNION EUROPEAN UNION OFFICE IN KOSOVO LOCAL SCHENGEN COOPERATION (LSC) KOSOVO 2013-2014 REPORT 1. Introduction This report takes stock of major developments in the framework of the Local Schengen Cooperation among Member States present in Kosovo and covers the reporting period from April 2013 till March 2014. The bimonthly meetings continued to be convoked and chaired by the European Union Office in Kosovo. There were no major developments in regards to the Member States presence in Kosovo. Norway continues to represent Denmark in matters concerning handling of applications for visas and permits. Italy also issues visas on behalf of Estonia. Sweden and Norway facilitate visa acquisition through online visa application systems which in the case of Norway by now make up nearly 100% of all applications. Switzerland issues visas on behalf of France, Austria and Liechtenstein and as of 2012 also receives applications for long-term visas from FyROM and Albania. Belgium is issuing visas for Luxembourg and The Netherlands. Slovenia issues visas for Latvia. The largest number of visa applications are still addressed to the German and the Swiss Embassies. The Czech Republic and Sweden collect and issued visas in Skopje/FyROM. The Slovak Republic collects and processes visa applications through its Liaison Office in Pristina. The visas are then issued in the Slovak Embassy in Belgrade and delivered to the applicants through the Liaison office in Pristina. In early 2014, the Liaison Office of Greece officially informed that as of 20 th March 2014, Greece affixes visa stickers, residence permits and entry-exit stamps on ordinary, diplomatic and official passports issued by Kosovo. At the same time it was specified that this does not constitute by any means an official recognition of Kosovo as an independent State. A number of Member States continue to bilaterally apply visa facilitation provisions from the visa facilitation agreements that were signed with other countries of the region. Therefore different visa fees are applied by Member States. The visa fee for holders of Kosovo passports is €60 for Austria, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, France, Iceland, Italy, Latvia, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Spain and Switzerland. Other Schengen countries apply the reduced visa fee of €35. Italy is now following the standard Schengen procedures and has homogenized the costs of applications. 12893/14 PR/lm 113 DG D 1 A EN
2. LSC meetings held in 2013-2014 Four regular and one ad-hoc LSC meetings were held in the period from April 2013 till April 2014.The Ad-hoc meeting was called upon Greece’s request to clarify and discuss issues pertaining to the country's decision to start affixing visa stickers and stamps on ordinary, diplomatic and official passports of Kosovo. The meetings were generally well attended (average of 15-20 participants). The large majority of Member State representatives are located in Pristina with the exception of two Member States that travel regularly from Skopje to attend LSC meetings in Pristina (Sweden and the Czech Republic). LSC meetings are chaired by the Head of the Political, Economic and EU integration section with the assistance of the LSC contact person at the European Union Office in Kosovo. While topics such as the use of the harmonized lists of supporting documents continued to be subjects of discussion, the ongoing visa liberalization dialogue and the civil status registration reform, including document security, dominated this year’s agenda. On one occasion, COM Decision (2013) 5914 on the introduction of visa biometry for Kosovo was discussed. In addition, the meetings served to collect visa statistics and statistics on readmissions. The LSC meetings served to update Member States on the visa liberalization dialogue. During the reporting period, two missions took place to assess Kosovo’s level of implementation in the areas of repatriation and reintegration, document security, migration, asylum, border control and public order and security. The EUO ensured the close involvement of Member States with the experts visiting Kosovo, most notably to obtain their views on the functioning of repatriation procedures and reintegration, document security or the fight against organized crime. The EUO informed Member States of the adoption by the Council of the amendment of Regulation 539/2001 introducing a potential visa suspension clause for the already visa free Western Balkan countries in cases of a sudden rise of asylum seekers originating from those countries. In regards to visa statistics refusal rates are still on the high side (15-20%) and waiting times remain long. The summary reports of the LSC meetings were shared with Member States in Pristina, which have been encouraged to share them with their capitals. 12893/14 PR/lm 114 DG D 1 A EN
Page 1 and 2:
Council of the European Union Bruss
Page 3 and 4:
SENEGAL* SERBIA SOUTH KOREA SRI LAN
Page 5 and 6:
3.2 Assessment of the need to harmo
Page 7 and 8:
The harmonisation of the list of su
Page 9 and 10:
5 réunions habituelles (en avril,
Page 11 and 12:
EUROPEAN UNION DELEGATION TO ARGENT
Page 13 and 14:
The main challenge for 2014 with re
Page 15 and 16:
organized as another step in the pu
Page 17 and 18:
The EUDEL held an extraordinary mee
Page 19 and 20:
EUROPEAN UNION DELEGATION TO Azerba
Page 21 and 22:
information via established Local S
Page 23 and 24:
3.3 Exchange of information Monthly
Page 25 and 26:
EUROPEAN UNION DELEGATION TO THE RE
Page 27 and 28:
4. Challenges 1. Response to challe
Page 29 and 30:
A partir du 31 mars 2014, aucun vis
Page 31 and 32:
1. Le récent cas de trafic de 200
Page 33 and 34:
The harmonization of the list of su
Page 35 and 36:
2. LSC meetings held in 2013 During
Page 37 and 38:
Please see annex A, which table sho
Page 39 and 40:
(BAC is a mechanism specified to en
Page 41 and 42:
Due to the continental size of Braz
Page 43 and 44:
UNION EUROPÉENE DÉLÉGATION AU RO
Page 45 and 46:
Il est constaté que pour les EM no
Page 47 and 48:
ouleversement en ce qui concerne la
Page 49 and 50:
EUROPEAN UNION DELEGATION TO CANADA
Page 51 and 52:
3.3 Exchange of information The gro
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
3.3 Exchange of information The fol
Page 57 and 58:
The Member States do not, apparentl
Page 59 and 60:
EUROPEAN UNION DELEGATION TO CHINA
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64: Related to the "ban" on setting up
Page 65 and 66: UNION EUROPEENNE DELEGATION EN REPU
Page 67 and 68: COOPERATION LOCALE AU TITRE DE SCHE
Page 69 and 70: Allemagne Belgique Espagne France I
Page 71 and 72: Coordination with Member States rep
Page 73 and 74: 3.4 Any other initiative taken in L
Page 75 and 76: 3.2 Assessment of the need to harmo
Page 77 and 78: 3. State of play 3.1 Application of
Page 79 and 80: UNION EUROPÉENNE DELEGATION AU GAB
Page 81 and 82: 2. Réunions LSC organisées en 201
Page 83 and 84: EUROPEAN UNION DELEGATION TO GEORGI
Page 87 and 88: situation triggered notably the vig
Page 89 and 90: 3. Etat des lieux 3.1 Application d
Page 91 and 92: EUROPEAN UNION DELEGATION TO INDIA
Page 93 and 94: exchange served as a basis for futu
Page 95 and 96: more useful than the previous ones
Page 97 and 98: Other SGs focused on the assessment
Page 99 and 100: This report was prepared by the EUD
Page 101 and 102: any implications. While there were
Page 103 and 104: 3.1 Application of the Visa Code In
Page 105 and 106: This report has been approved by th
Page 107 and 108: Precise formulations were found to
Page 111 and 112: EUROPEAN UNION DELEGATION OF THE EU
Page 113: 4. Challenges in 2014-2015 On local
Page 117 and 118: 5. Other issues Kosovo is still con
Page 119 and 120: La coopération est encouragée et
Page 121 and 122: UNION EUROPEENNE DELEGATION EN REPU
Page 123 and 124: EUROPEAN UNION DELEGATION TO MONTEN
Page 127 and 128: isks. Therefore, in general terms,
Page 129 and 130: 3.2 Assessment of the need to harmo
Page 131 and 132: - Belgium - France - Germany - The
Page 133 and 134: oader scale changes both in Abuja a
Page 135 and 136: 30 May 2014 LOCAL SCHENGEN COOPERAT
Page 137 and 138: Ensure that regular meetings of con
Page 139 and 140: applications for Filipino applicant
Page 141 and 142: done to discuss how an accredited c
Page 143 and 144: The Schengen Member States and EUD
Page 145 and 146: LOCAL SCHENGEN COOPERATION (LSC) in
Page 147 and 148: As regards the challenges indicated
Page 149 and 150: The key challenge during the report
Page 151 and 152: UNION EUROPÉENNE Délégation en R
Page 153 and 154: EUROPEAN UNION DELEGATION TO THE RE
Page 155 and 156: LSC Serbia Schengen office 2012 A v
Page 157 and 158: The possibility to trigger such a '
Page 159 and 160: Coordination meetings are chaired b
Page 161 and 162: from the US Foreign Service Institu
Page 163 and 164: The EU Delegations main role in the
Page 165 and 166:
LOCAL SCHENGEN COOPERATION (LSC) in
Page 167 and 168:
European Economic and Trade Office
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
that as a reciprocity measure the E
Page 173 and 174:
From 2013 on Schengen states' citiz
Page 175 and 176:
Republic. In at least one instance
Page 177 and 178:
September 2013. Because of the larg
Page 179 and 180:
The participation of Bulgaria, Roma
Page 181 and 182:
LSC exchanged information on the co
Page 183 and 184:
% Multiple entry % refusal rate 201
Page 185 and 186:
3.2. Exchange of information on the
Page 187 and 188:
Early 2013 the Yammer tool for exch
Page 189 and 190:
provide solutions for approval by t
Page 191 and 192:
EUDEL has also been regularly updat
Page 193 and 194:
3. State of play 3.1 Application of
Page 195 and 196:
Annex 1: Representation arrangement
Page 197 and 198:
2. LSC meetings in 2013-2014 Three
Page 199 and 200:
EUROPEAN UNION Office of the Europe
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Due to difficulties in harmonising
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209:
3.4 Any other initiative taken in L
show all

eu-com-schengen-coop

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?