eu-com-schengen-coop

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Following a revision of the mailing list invitations have been also sent to locations outside the capital of those countries which do not apply the common visa policy yet but committed to do so, and reports equally be shared to them. 3. State of play 3.1 Application of the Visa Code According to Regulation (EC) No 1244/2009 since 19 December 2009 biometric Serbian passports (excluded those issued by the Serbian Coordination Directorate - Koordinaciona uprava, which undertook the competence of issuing passports residents in Kosovo* ) are visa free. Visas are almost exclusively issued to third country nationals residents in Serbia. To be noted that some Schengen States issue in Belgrade also visas for residents in Kosovo 3.2 Assessment of the need to harmonise the lists of supporting documents Due to the situation described under 3.1 MS feels no need to harmonize documents at this stage, consider that practices are broadly speaking harmonized and assess that there are no specific risk of visa shopping. 3.3 Exchange of information Information is exchanged on monthly statistics. EUD proposed to standardize information shared in accordance with Annex XII of the Schengen visa codex. See enclosed statistic compiled for 2013, according to the information provided by Schengen states. EUD also timely exchanged information coming from HQs on amendments to the Visa Code - visa waiver suspension mechanism, new rules for calculating short stays of third-country nationals within the Schengen area, validity of travel documents, table of travel documents 12893/14 PR/lm 153 DG D 1 A EN
LSC Serbia Schengen office 2012 A visas applied for A visas issued ME A visas issued A visas not issued C visas applied for C visas issued ME C visas issued LTV issued C visas not issued BE 0 0 0 0 34 34 nd 0 6 CZ 0 0 0 0 399 393 173 17 6 DK 0 0 0 0 32 32 12 0 0 DE 1 1 0 0 1889 1828 1814 32 61 GR 0 0 0 0 294 292 291 0 2 ES 0 0 0 0 252 250 22 1 1 FR 1 1 0 0 62 54 15 13 8 IT 0 0 0 0 596 593 540 0 3 HU Belgrade 0 0 0 0 nd 1277 nd 1 15 HU Subotica 0 0 0 0 54 54 16 0 0 NL 0 0 0 0 44 44 nd 0 0 AT 0 0 0 0 293 278 152 20 5 PL 0 0 0 0 85 71 41 0 14 PT 0 0 0 0 26 22 nd 0 4 SI 0 0 0 0 369 346 316 0 23 SK 0 0 0 0 273 39 87 178 56 FI 0 0 0 0 15 15 12 2 0 SE 0 0 0 0 43 42 10 0 0 NO 0 0 0 0 26 21 15 0 5 CH 0 0 0 0- 586 582 450 6 4 12893/14 PR/lm 154 DG D 1 A EN
Page 1 and 2:
Council of the European Union Bruss
Page 3 and 4:
SENEGAL* SERBIA SOUTH KOREA SRI LAN
Page 5 and 6:
3.2 Assessment of the need to harmo
Page 7 and 8:
The harmonisation of the list of su
Page 9 and 10:
5 réunions habituelles (en avril,
Page 11 and 12:
EUROPEAN UNION DELEGATION TO ARGENT
Page 13 and 14:
The main challenge for 2014 with re
Page 15 and 16:
organized as another step in the pu
Page 17 and 18:
The EUDEL held an extraordinary mee
Page 19 and 20:
EUROPEAN UNION DELEGATION TO Azerba
Page 21 and 22:
information via established Local S
Page 23 and 24:
3.3 Exchange of information Monthly
Page 25 and 26:
EUROPEAN UNION DELEGATION TO THE RE
Page 27 and 28:
4. Challenges 1. Response to challe
Page 29 and 30:
A partir du 31 mars 2014, aucun vis
Page 31 and 32:
1. Le récent cas de trafic de 200
Page 33 and 34:
The harmonization of the list of su
Page 35 and 36:
2. LSC meetings held in 2013 During
Page 37 and 38:
Please see annex A, which table sho
Page 39 and 40:
(BAC is a mechanism specified to en
Page 41 and 42:
Due to the continental size of Braz
Page 43 and 44:
UNION EUROPÉENE DÉLÉGATION AU RO
Page 45 and 46:
Il est constaté que pour les EM no
Page 47 and 48:
ouleversement en ce qui concerne la
Page 49 and 50:
EUROPEAN UNION DELEGATION TO CANADA
Page 51 and 52:
3.3 Exchange of information The gro
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
3.3 Exchange of information The fol
Page 57 and 58:
The Member States do not, apparentl
Page 59 and 60:
EUROPEAN UNION DELEGATION TO CHINA
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Related to the "ban" on setting up
Page 65 and 66:
UNION EUROPEENNE DELEGATION EN REPU
Page 67 and 68:
COOPERATION LOCALE AU TITRE DE SCHE
Page 69 and 70:
Allemagne Belgique Espagne France I
Page 71 and 72:
Coordination with Member States rep
Page 73 and 74:
3.4 Any other initiative taken in L
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
3. State of play 3.1 Application of
Page 79 and 80:
UNION EUROPÉENNE DELEGATION AU GAB
Page 81 and 82:
2. Réunions LSC organisées en 201
Page 83 and 84:
EUROPEAN UNION DELEGATION TO GEORGI
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
situation triggered notably the vig
Page 89 and 90:
3. Etat des lieux 3.1 Application d
Page 91 and 92:
EUROPEAN UNION DELEGATION TO INDIA
Page 93 and 94:
exchange served as a basis for futu
Page 95 and 96:
more useful than the previous ones
Page 97 and 98:
Other SGs focused on the assessment
Page 99 and 100:
This report was prepared by the EUD
Page 101 and 102:
any implications. While there were
Page 103 and 104: 3.1 Application of the Visa Code In
Page 105 and 106: This report has been approved by th
Page 107 and 108: Precise formulations were found to
Page 109 and 110: 3.7 Any other initiative taken in L
Page 111 and 112: EUROPEAN UNION DELEGATION OF THE EU
Page 113 and 114: 4. Challenges in 2014-2015 On local
Page 115 and 116: 2. LSC meetings held in 2013-2014 F
Page 117 and 118: 5. Other issues Kosovo is still con
Page 119 and 120: La coopération est encouragée et
Page 121 and 122: UNION EUROPEENNE DELEGATION EN REPU
Page 123 and 124: EUROPEAN UNION DELEGATION TO MONTEN
Page 125 and 126: 3.4 Any other initiative taken in L
Page 127 and 128: isks. Therefore, in general terms,
Page 129 and 130: 3.2 Assessment of the need to harmo
Page 131 and 132: - Belgium - France - Germany - The
Page 133 and 134: oader scale changes both in Abuja a
Page 135 and 136: 30 May 2014 LOCAL SCHENGEN COOPERAT
Page 137 and 138: Ensure that regular meetings of con
Page 139 and 140: applications for Filipino applicant
Page 141 and 142: done to discuss how an accredited c
Page 143 and 144: The Schengen Member States and EUD
Page 145 and 146: LOCAL SCHENGEN COOPERATION (LSC) in
Page 147 and 148: As regards the challenges indicated
Page 149 and 150: The key challenge during the report
Page 151 and 152: UNION EUROPÉENNE Délégation en R
Page 153: EUROPEAN UNION DELEGATION TO THE RE
Page 157 and 158: The possibility to trigger such a '
Page 159 and 160: Coordination meetings are chaired b
Page 161 and 162: from the US Foreign Service Institu
Page 163 and 164: The EU Delegations main role in the
Page 165 and 166: LOCAL SCHENGEN COOPERATION (LSC) in
Page 167 and 168: European Economic and Trade Office
Page 169 and 170: EUROPEAN UNION DELEGATION TO THE RE
Page 171 and 172: that as a reciprocity measure the E
Page 173 and 174: From 2013 on Schengen states' citiz
Page 175 and 176: Republic. In at least one instance
Page 177 and 178: September 2013. Because of the larg
Page 179 and 180: The participation of Bulgaria, Roma
Page 181 and 182: LSC exchanged information on the co
Page 183 and 184: % Multiple entry % refusal rate 201
Page 185 and 186: 3.2. Exchange of information on the
Page 187 and 188: Early 2013 the Yammer tool for exch
Page 189 and 190: provide solutions for approval by t
Page 191 and 192: EUDEL has also been regularly updat
Page 193 and 194: 3. State of play 3.1 Application of
Page 195 and 196: Annex 1: Representation arrangement
Page 197 and 198: 2. LSC meetings in 2013-2014 Three
Page 199 and 200: EUROPEAN UNION Office of the Europe
Page 201 and 202: 3.2 Assessment of the need to harmo
Page 203 and 204: Due to difficulties in harmonising
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209:
show all

eu-com-schengen-coop

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?