eu-com-schengen-coop
eu-com-schengen-coop
eu-com-schengen-coop
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
3.4 Any other initiative taken in LSC n/a<br />
4. Challenges<br />
4.1. Response to challenges listed in the 2012-2013 report<br />
The issue of high visa refusal rate in Georgia has been raised in the LSC meetings and a list of<br />
possible reasons sent to DG HOME in February 2014.<br />
The positive experience of two MS which went ahead with outsourcing the collection of supporting<br />
documents for visa applications has been shared with other LSC members.<br />
Further facilitation for family members according to Visa Facilitation Agreement Declaration was<br />
considered; DG HOME was provided with a table illustrating MS practices in this regard. No<br />
harmonization was achieved.<br />
A proposal to harmonise practices in relation to waiving visa fee for persons ac<strong>com</strong>panying<br />
disabled was followed.<br />
MS reported progress in reducing waiting times related to the visa application appointment system.<br />
4.2. Subjects to be addressed within the next reporting period (2014-2015).<br />
High visa refusal rate continues to be criticized in Georgia. The authorities fear that this may be an<br />
impediment to the aim of visa free travel (Visa Liberalization Action Plan is being implemented).<br />
The issue will need to be given more attention in the next reporting period.<br />
Following the adoption of the decision on the harmonized list of supporting documents, the LSC<br />
will have to ensure its proper application.<br />
The LSC will discuss the way information to the public is presented on EU MS Consulates<br />
websites.<br />
VIS roll-out planned in Georgia for January 2015 is another issue to be pursued in the next<br />
reporting period.<br />
Since the issue of false / counterfeit / forged supporting documents is a big problem in Georgia and<br />
is often cited as a reason for high refusal rate, the GEO authorities may need to be involved in<br />
solving this issue.<br />
5. Other issues n/a<br />
Drafted by EUDEL<br />
Approved by MS in Tbilisi<br />
12893/14 PR/lm 84<br />
DG D 1 A<br />
EN