- Page 1 and 2:
Council of the European Union Bruss
- Page 3 and 4:
SENEGAL* SERBIA SOUTH KOREA SRI LAN
- Page 5 and 6:
3.2 Assessment of the need to harmo
- Page 7 and 8:
The harmonisation of the list of su
- Page 9 and 10:
5 réunions habituelles (en avril,
- Page 11 and 12:
EUROPEAN UNION DELEGATION TO ARGENT
- Page 13 and 14:
The main challenge for 2014 with re
- Page 15 and 16:
organized as another step in the pu
- Page 17 and 18:
The EUDEL held an extraordinary mee
- Page 19 and 20:
EUROPEAN UNION DELEGATION TO Azerba
- Page 21 and 22:
information via established Local S
- Page 23 and 24:
3.3 Exchange of information Monthly
- Page 25 and 26:
EUROPEAN UNION DELEGATION TO THE RE
- Page 27 and 28:
4. Challenges 1. Response to challe
- Page 29 and 30:
A partir du 31 mars 2014, aucun vis
- Page 31 and 32:
1. Le récent cas de trafic de 200
- Page 33 and 34:
The harmonization of the list of su
- Page 35 and 36:
2. LSC meetings held in 2013 During
- Page 37 and 38:
Please see annex A, which table sho
- Page 39 and 40:
(BAC is a mechanism specified to en
- Page 41 and 42:
Due to the continental size of Braz
- Page 43 and 44:
UNION EUROPÉENE DÉLÉGATION AU RO
- Page 45 and 46:
Il est constaté que pour les EM no
- Page 47 and 48:
ouleversement en ce qui concerne la
- Page 49 and 50:
EUROPEAN UNION DELEGATION TO CANADA
- Page 51 and 52:
3.3 Exchange of information The gro
- Page 53 and 54:
EUROPEAN UNION DELEGATION TO THE RE
- Page 55 and 56:
3.3 Exchange of information The fol
- Page 57 and 58:
The Member States do not, apparentl
- Page 59 and 60:
EUROPEAN UNION DELEGATION TO CHINA
- Page 61 and 62:
3.2 Assessment of the need to harmo
- Page 63 and 64:
Related to the "ban" on setting up
- Page 65 and 66: UNION EUROPEENNE DELEGATION EN REPU
- Page 67 and 68: COOPERATION LOCALE AU TITRE DE SCHE
- Page 69 and 70: Allemagne Belgique Espagne France I
- Page 71 and 72: Coordination with Member States rep
- Page 73 and 74: 3.4 Any other initiative taken in L
- Page 75 and 76: 3.2 Assessment of the need to harmo
- Page 77 and 78: 3. State of play 3.1 Application of
- Page 79 and 80: UNION EUROPÉENNE DELEGATION AU GAB
- Page 81 and 82: 2. Réunions LSC organisées en 201
- Page 83 and 84: EUROPEAN UNION DELEGATION TO GEORGI
- Page 85 and 86: 3.4 Any other initiative taken in L
- Page 87 and 88: situation triggered notably the vig
- Page 89 and 90: 3. Etat des lieux 3.1 Application d
- Page 91 and 92: EUROPEAN UNION DELEGATION TO INDIA
- Page 93 and 94: exchange served as a basis for futu
- Page 95 and 96: more useful than the previous ones
- Page 97 and 98: Other SGs focused on the assessment
- Page 99 and 100: This report was prepared by the EUD
- Page 101 and 102: any implications. While there were
- Page 103 and 104: 3.1 Application of the Visa Code In
- Page 105 and 106: This report has been approved by th
- Page 107 and 108: Precise formulations were found to
- Page 109 and 110: 3.7 Any other initiative taken in L
- Page 111 and 112: EUROPEAN UNION DELEGATION OF THE EU
- Page 113 and 114: 4. Challenges in 2014-2015 On local
- Page 115: 2. LSC meetings held in 2013-2014 F
- Page 119 and 120: La coopération est encouragée et
- Page 121 and 122: UNION EUROPEENNE DELEGATION EN REPU
- Page 123 and 124: EUROPEAN UNION DELEGATION TO MONTEN
- Page 125 and 126: 3.4 Any other initiative taken in L
- Page 127 and 128: isks. Therefore, in general terms,
- Page 129 and 130: 3.2 Assessment of the need to harmo
- Page 131 and 132: - Belgium - France - Germany - The
- Page 133 and 134: oader scale changes both in Abuja a
- Page 135 and 136: 30 May 2014 LOCAL SCHENGEN COOPERAT
- Page 137 and 138: Ensure that regular meetings of con
- Page 139 and 140: applications for Filipino applicant
- Page 141 and 142: done to discuss how an accredited c
- Page 143 and 144: The Schengen Member States and EUD
- Page 145 and 146: LOCAL SCHENGEN COOPERATION (LSC) in
- Page 147 and 148: As regards the challenges indicated
- Page 149 and 150: The key challenge during the report
- Page 151 and 152: UNION EUROPÉENNE Délégation en R
- Page 153 and 154: EUROPEAN UNION DELEGATION TO THE RE
- Page 155 and 156: LSC Serbia Schengen office 2012 A v
- Page 157 and 158: The possibility to trigger such a '
- Page 159 and 160: Coordination meetings are chaired b
- Page 161 and 162: from the US Foreign Service Institu
- Page 163 and 164: The EU Delegations main role in the
- Page 165 and 166: LOCAL SCHENGEN COOPERATION (LSC) in
- Page 167 and 168:
European Economic and Trade Office
- Page 169 and 170:
EUROPEAN UNION DELEGATION TO THE RE
- Page 171 and 172:
that as a reciprocity measure the E
- Page 173 and 174:
From 2013 on Schengen states' citiz
- Page 175 and 176:
Republic. In at least one instance
- Page 177 and 178:
September 2013. Because of the larg
- Page 179 and 180:
The participation of Bulgaria, Roma
- Page 181 and 182:
LSC exchanged information on the co
- Page 183 and 184:
% Multiple entry % refusal rate 201
- Page 185 and 186:
3.2. Exchange of information on the
- Page 187 and 188:
Early 2013 the Yammer tool for exch
- Page 189 and 190:
provide solutions for approval by t
- Page 191 and 192:
EUDEL has also been regularly updat
- Page 193 and 194:
3. State of play 3.1 Application of
- Page 195 and 196:
Annex 1: Representation arrangement
- Page 197 and 198:
2. LSC meetings in 2013-2014 Three
- Page 199 and 200:
EUROPEAN UNION Office of the Europe
- Page 201 and 202:
3.2 Assessment of the need to harmo
- Page 203 and 204:
Due to difficulties in harmonising
- Page 205 and 206:
EUROPEAN UNION DELEGATION TO THE RE
- Page 207 and 208:
EUROPEAN UNION DELEGATION TO THE RE
- Page 209:
3.4 Any other initiative taken in L