eu-com-schengen-coop

More documents

Recommendations

Info

of the EU common visa policy. The SG were set up, on an ad hoc basis, at EUD/MS suggestion pursuing to first information exchanges held in the Plenary (see section 3.3, "other issues"). Building upon the successful experiment of 2012-13 and a standard operating procedure adopted then, each SG was composed by interested MS and chaired by a volunteering "Chef de file". The SG served, prima facie, as platform for more in-depth information exchange among like-minded countries. The latter, starting from their own mission's procedures, assessed a particular issue, shared their findings on several operational harmonisation options, reporting them to the Plenary with a structured suggestion for a locally agreed harmonised approach -when applicable- to be endorsed. This innovative working method, which moved the LSC from a centralised to a decentralised interaction system, proved extremely effective in terms of joint team work, strengthening the "esprit de corps" among LSC Consuls in Delhi. Moreover, the achievements of the first SGs attracted more MS to engage and deliver tangible outcomes, further increasing the proactive, result-oriented approach which by the end f the reporting period characterised the LSC- India. All SGs worked according to the priorities set by the Plenary, the availability of the participating MS and the personal drive of its Chef de file. Some SGs organised meetings to boost cooperation, others worked mainly by electronic exchanges. After an average period of six months from their inception, the Plenary assessed the functioning of the relevant SG and set its next priorities for action. Unless otherwise agreed, once reached its primary goal, a specific SG would be dissolved. There were several tasks completed by the SGs and implemented by all MS at the end of the reporting period. The most valuable one was the endorsement of (1) the "Schengen States Consular Posts' approved list of Indian Travel Insurance Companies providing travel medical insurance for Schengen Visa procedure" i.e. a comprehensive bona fide list of insurance companies offering adequate TMI, i.e. corresponding to the requirements of the Visa Code and based on a strict compliance table, whose criteria were set up by the SG. (2) A specific compendium (handbook/user guide) was also drawn up, while (3) the insurance companies developed at LSC request a webbased tool to enable visa officers to check TMI policies online. This decreased dramatically the time necessary for MS visa officers to perform such task. Apart its technical significance, given its unprecedented local (and global) 59 political value, the LSC brought this achievement to the attention of the EU Heads of Missions during one of their apex intra-EU coordination meetings. Upon completion of the TMI bona fide list, an immediate follow up initiative was adopted: (4) a handson, interactive training on the implementation of the new regime for over 25 selected LSC visa officers (including those from Schengen "candidate countries"), which received enthusiastic MS appreciation. MS requested the EUD to organise a biannual training for MS visa officers, on a regular basis. In parallel, the following concrete outcomes were achieved. (5) Adoption of a common information sheet, available in all MS and respective ESPs website, which improved drastically the consistency of information provided to Schengen visa applicants. (6) LSC-India contribution for the Visa Code Regulation revision. (7) Implementation of a common template for immediate visa alerts or visa enquiries; (8) Synoptic table on visa coverage/representation in neighbouring Countries, containing information beyond Visa Code Handbook Annex 28. (9) Harmonised modus operandi on handwritten correction of personal data in Indian passports; (10) Aggregated survey on diplomatic and service visa waivers in force and under negotiations containing information beyond Visa Code Handbook Annex 5; (11) (selected) MS survey on visas and residence permits granted to Indian diplomatic and non-diplomatic passport holders. All these were achieved in addition to several (12) routine updates, in particular that of the first ever 360 degree LSC survey prepared in 2012. 59 It is the first -ever- approved by any LSC operation in the world and it has literally impacted on the TMI market in India. 12893/14 PR/lm 95 DG D 1 A EN
Other SGs focused on the assessment of a harmonised approach on other priority areas, which would require further efforts in the future, and which constitute -per se- the priority areas for the LSC-India in the next reporting period. Such "ongoing" initiatives encompass (in brackets the state of the SG proceedings at the end of the reporting period): (i) "best practices" sharing on facilitations practices related to first track/VIP/bona fide applicants, especially for business and tourism purposes (first synoptic assessment drafted); (ii) cahier de doléances, i.e. a collection of MS economic operators but also tourists, students, professors, journalists about the most common hindrances encountered while applying for visas at the relevant Indian missions (first draft submitted. Contacts with European operators started); (iii) Tibetans visa applications (preliminary assessment made and ad hoc study mission in the pipeline); (iv) commercial intermediaries, including travel agencies and travel facilitators 60 (first assessment completed. Way ahead to be agreed upon by the Plenary). 4. Challenges in 2014-15 1. All challenges listed in the 2012-13 report were addressed in 2013-2014 and showed sensible developments, which led to concrete harmonisation, as detailed above. 2. The main 2014-2015 systemic challenges for the LSC-India are likely to be a) biometric data collection, both in terms of technical implementation as well as communication. Before the new VIS system is rolled out, its stringent requirements shall be explained locally (with outreach activities, in particular to the press) in order to avoid potential misperceptions and reactions; b) a predictable further increase in the number of visa applications per MS. Besides the subjects to be addressed upon specific instructions / decisions by the Visa Committee, the main priorities on which the LSC-India interactions shall focus in the upcoming period are: (1) first and foremost the finalisation of the harmonisation exercise on ongoing activities currently examined by the various SGs as listed in section 3.4. (2) specific action will aim to achieve the following concrete deliverables: (a) adoption the LSC 2012-2014 decisions "compendium"; (b) effective exchange of monthly visa statistics (Schengen and national) detailed by purpose, as well as a synoptic table of annual statistics (2011-2013) MSwise and consular location-wise; (c) further promotion, on a reciprocal basis, of legitimate shortstay travellers (in particular for business and tourism purposes. For the latter, it would be explored whether appropriate conditions are met, locally, to engage in exchange of reciprocal information and engage in discussion, in the framework of the High Level Dialogue on Migration and Mobility, drawing inspiration, from the EU side on the EU-China arrangement on Approved Destination Status); (d) re-assess the need to agree on harmonised criteria for examining applications in relation to visa fee exemptions. (3) On a more structural level, several other initiatives shall be carried out or pro-actively encouraged (or simply explored), including: 1. actual coordination by the EUD in locations outside the capital, similarly to what happens in comparable Schengen operations (Russia and China, in particular); 2. series of ad hoc outreach activities to representatives of the consulates of EU MS not applying the Community acquis and like-minded third countries as well as local authorities, taking into account that the LSC-India has become, by now, a point of reference locally and globally; 3. exchange of visa officers among MS on a bilateral basis, to enhance cooperation/best practices sharing; 4. specific local hands-on trainings; 5. discussion on common challenges with LSCs of similar magnitude or those in the region. For the latter, the idea of organising a regional seminar shall be explored. 6. As for information exchange, further attention shall be devoted to a) external 60 Currently "travel (and "students placing") agents" activities are largely unregulated in practice and are reported to be involved in the majority of migration abuse, fraud and smuggling cases. 12893/14 PR/lm 96 DG D 1 A EN
Page 1 and 2:
Council of the European Union Bruss
Page 3 and 4:
SENEGAL* SERBIA SOUTH KOREA SRI LAN
Page 5 and 6:
3.2 Assessment of the need to harmo
Page 7 and 8:
The harmonisation of the list of su
Page 9 and 10:
5 réunions habituelles (en avril,
Page 11 and 12:
EUROPEAN UNION DELEGATION TO ARGENT
Page 13 and 14:
The main challenge for 2014 with re
Page 15 and 16:
organized as another step in the pu
Page 17 and 18:
The EUDEL held an extraordinary mee
Page 19 and 20:
EUROPEAN UNION DELEGATION TO Azerba
Page 21 and 22:
information via established Local S
Page 23 and 24:
3.3 Exchange of information Monthly
Page 25 and 26:
EUROPEAN UNION DELEGATION TO THE RE
Page 27 and 28:
4. Challenges 1. Response to challe
Page 29 and 30:
A partir du 31 mars 2014, aucun vis
Page 31 and 32:
1. Le récent cas de trafic de 200
Page 33 and 34:
The harmonization of the list of su
Page 35 and 36:
2. LSC meetings held in 2013 During
Page 37 and 38:
Please see annex A, which table sho
Page 39 and 40:
(BAC is a mechanism specified to en
Page 41 and 42:
Due to the continental size of Braz
Page 43 and 44:
UNION EUROPÉENE DÉLÉGATION AU RO
Page 45 and 46: Il est constaté que pour les EM no
Page 47 and 48: ouleversement en ce qui concerne la
Page 49 and 50: EUROPEAN UNION DELEGATION TO CANADA
Page 51 and 52: 3.3 Exchange of information The gro
Page 53 and 54: EUROPEAN UNION DELEGATION TO THE RE
Page 55 and 56: 3.3 Exchange of information The fol
Page 57 and 58: The Member States do not, apparentl
Page 59 and 60: EUROPEAN UNION DELEGATION TO CHINA
Page 61 and 62: 3.2 Assessment of the need to harmo
Page 63 and 64: Related to the "ban" on setting up
Page 65 and 66: UNION EUROPEENNE DELEGATION EN REPU
Page 67 and 68: COOPERATION LOCALE AU TITRE DE SCHE
Page 69 and 70: Allemagne Belgique Espagne France I
Page 71 and 72: Coordination with Member States rep
Page 73 and 74: 3.4 Any other initiative taken in L
Page 77 and 78: 3. State of play 3.1 Application of
Page 79 and 80: UNION EUROPÉENNE DELEGATION AU GAB
Page 81 and 82: 2. Réunions LSC organisées en 201
Page 83 and 84: EUROPEAN UNION DELEGATION TO GEORGI
Page 87 and 88: situation triggered notably the vig
Page 89 and 90: 3. Etat des lieux 3.1 Application d
Page 91 and 92: EUROPEAN UNION DELEGATION TO INDIA
Page 93 and 94: exchange served as a basis for futu
Page 95: more useful than the previous ones
Page 99 and 100: This report was prepared by the EUD
Page 101 and 102: any implications. While there were
Page 103 and 104: 3.1 Application of the Visa Code In
Page 105 and 106: This report has been approved by th
Page 107 and 108: Precise formulations were found to
Page 111 and 112: EUROPEAN UNION DELEGATION OF THE EU
Page 113 and 114: 4. Challenges in 2014-2015 On local
Page 115 and 116: 2. LSC meetings held in 2013-2014 F
Page 117 and 118: 5. Other issues Kosovo is still con
Page 119 and 120: La coopération est encouragée et
Page 121 and 122: UNION EUROPEENNE DELEGATION EN REPU
Page 123 and 124: EUROPEAN UNION DELEGATION TO MONTEN
Page 127 and 128: isks. Therefore, in general terms,
Page 131 and 132: - Belgium - France - Germany - The
Page 133 and 134: oader scale changes both in Abuja a
Page 135 and 136: 30 May 2014 LOCAL SCHENGEN COOPERAT
Page 137 and 138: Ensure that regular meetings of con
Page 139 and 140: applications for Filipino applicant
Page 141 and 142: done to discuss how an accredited c
Page 143 and 144: The Schengen Member States and EUD
Page 145 and 146: LOCAL SCHENGEN COOPERATION (LSC) in
Page 147 and 148:
As regards the challenges indicated
Page 149 and 150:
The key challenge during the report
Page 151 and 152:
UNION EUROPÉENNE Délégation en R
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
LSC Serbia Schengen office 2012 A v
Page 157 and 158:
The possibility to trigger such a '
Page 159 and 160:
Coordination meetings are chaired b
Page 161 and 162:
from the US Foreign Service Institu
Page 163 and 164:
The EU Delegations main role in the
Page 165 and 166:
LOCAL SCHENGEN COOPERATION (LSC) in
Page 167 and 168:
European Economic and Trade Office
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
that as a reciprocity measure the E
Page 173 and 174:
From 2013 on Schengen states' citiz
Page 175 and 176:
Republic. In at least one instance
Page 177 and 178:
September 2013. Because of the larg
Page 179 and 180:
The participation of Bulgaria, Roma
Page 181 and 182:
LSC exchanged information on the co
Page 183 and 184:
% Multiple entry % refusal rate 201
Page 185 and 186:
3.2. Exchange of information on the
Page 187 and 188:
Early 2013 the Yammer tool for exch
Page 189 and 190:
provide solutions for approval by t
Page 191 and 192:
EUDEL has also been regularly updat
Page 193 and 194:
3. State of play 3.1 Application of
Page 195 and 196:
Annex 1: Representation arrangement
Page 197 and 198:
2. LSC meetings in 2013-2014 Three
Page 199 and 200:
EUROPEAN UNION Office of the Europe
Page 201 and 202:
3.2 Assessment of the need to harmo
Page 203 and 204:
Due to difficulties in harmonising
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209:
3.4 Any other initiative taken in L
show all

eu-com-schengen-coop

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?