25.01.2015 Views

SErIES IAEA HumAn HEAltH SErIES IAEA Hum

SErIES IAEA HumAn HEAltH SErIES IAEA Hum

SErIES IAEA HumAn HEAltH SErIES IAEA Hum

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The last purpose highlights the fact that many clinicians accept clinical<br />

audit also as an educational activity, led by the profession but reported in general<br />

terms to managers.<br />

1.1.2. Internal or external audits<br />

Multidisciplinary clinical audit concerns not only the clinical practice<br />

within individual professions but also demonstrates the contributions made by<br />

each and the organizational links between them. Clinical audit thus reflects the<br />

clinical directorate and health care team setting, as well as their relationship to the<br />

overall management structure.<br />

The general principle of audit imposes the requirement that the auditor has<br />

to be independent of the service or process to be audited. Clinical audits are often<br />

internal, i.e. carried out within a certain health care institution, when the principle<br />

of independence is implemented by nominating auditors from subunits or<br />

departments of the institution different from the subunit to be audited. Internal<br />

audits should be routine activities within a good quality system.<br />

Emphasis has recently been placed on external audits, in which the auditors<br />

are external to the institution to be audited and thus totally independent of this<br />

institution [3]. The value of external audits lies mainly in providing the audit with<br />

more universal and broader perspectives, removing the possible inability of<br />

internal auditors to recognize, in their own environment, the weaknesses and<br />

limitations which may involve long-standing or routine practices. The external<br />

auditors may be able to better judge the consistency of procedures from one<br />

health care service to another and from one user to another. Recognition of<br />

substantial variations of a medical procedure among health care services and<br />

among clinicians can encourage a more systematic approach to this procedure<br />

and lead to subsequent improvement of the agreed practices. The systematic<br />

undertaking of clinical audits in a local or national health care area, and the<br />

sharing of the knowledge of good practices with a wider audience, will also<br />

contribute to further quality improvement of the practices, for the benefit of the<br />

medical services, patients and staff.<br />

By comparing the practice of the service against the standards of good<br />

practice, clinical audits can inform the staff of the health care service, as well as<br />

all other stakeholders, about the essential elements of quality and the weak points<br />

of the overall clinical service. The audits will indicate areas for improvement and<br />

provide reassurance on issues such as safety and efficacy, all of which are<br />

essential to creating an environment of continuous development.<br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!