prison statistics india 2011 - National Crime Records Bureau

More documents

Recommendations

Info

TABLE – 5.4 (Concluded) SL. NO. STATE/UT DOMICILE BELONGS TO STATE BELONGS TO OTHER STATE BELONGS TO OTHER COUNTRY (1) (2) (21) (22) (23) (24) TOTAL 1 ANDHRA PRADESH 17 0 0 17 2 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 0 0 0 0 3 ASSAM 0 0 0 0 4 BIHAR 11 2 0 13 5 CHHATTISGARH 13 0 0 13 6 GOA 0 0 0 0 7 GUJARAT 0 0 0 0 8 HARYANA 1 0 0 1 9 HIMACHAL PRADESH 0 0 0 0 10 JAMMU & KASHMIR 10 0 0 10 11 JHARKHAND 2 0 0 2 12 KARNATAKA 152 1 0 153 13 KERALA 5 0 0 5 14 MADHYA PRADESH 127 0 0 127 15 MAHARASHTRA 0 0 0 0 16 MANIPUR 0 0 0 0 17 MEGHALAYA 0 0 0 0 18 MIZORAM 0 0 0 0 19 NAGALAND 0 0 0 0 20 ODISHA 0 0 0 0 21 PUNJAB 0 0 0 0 22 RAJASTHAN 6 0 0 6 23 SIKKIM 0 0 0 0 24 TAMIL NADU 4 0 0 4 25 TRIPURA 0 0 0 0 26 UTTAR PRADESH 37 20 0 57 27 UTTARAKHAND 0 0 0 0 28 WEST BENGAL 11 0 265 276 TOTAL (STATES) 396 23 265 684 29 A & N ISLANDS 0 0 0 0 30 CHANDIGARH 0 0 0 0 31 D & N HAVELI 0 0 0 0 32 DAMAN & DIU 0 0 0 0 33 DELHI 0 0 0 0 34 LAKSHADWEEP 0 0 0 0 35 PUDUCHERRY 0 0 0 0 TOTAL (UTs) 0 0 0 0 TOTAL (ALL-INDIA) 396 23 265 684 110
CHAPTER - 6 PERIOD OF DETENTION OF UNDERTRIAL PRISONERS The undertrial prisoners formed a major share of prison inmates among various types of prisoners. The percentage of undertrial and convicted prisoners to the total prisoners in various jails was reported as 64.7% and 34.5% respectively in the country. The number and percentage of undertrial prisoners by period of detention are presented in Table-6.1 and Table-6.2 respectively with the period of detention varying from upto 3 months to above 5 years. It may be seen from the table that except Goa, Gujarat, Nagaland, Uttarakhand, A&N Islands, Daman & Diu and Lakshadweep, the highest percentage of undertrial prisoners were detained for less than three months in most of the States / UTs indicating good number of release of older undertrials from prisons. The highest percentage of detention upto 3 months was reported in Andhra Pradesh (92.6%) followed by Mizoram (76.4%), Tripura (71.8%), Kerala (69.0%), Assam (64.9%), Puducherry (61.6%), West Bengal (55.1%) and D&N Haveli (52.0%). In terms of absolute numbers, Uttar Pradesh (17,449) followed by Madhya Pradesh (8,312), Andhra Pradesh (7,916), West Bengal (7,476), Bihar (7,294) and Maharashtra (6,545) reported the higher number of undertrial prisoners detained upto three months. Significant proportion of prisoners was detained for a period of 3-6 months in Daman & Diu (52.9%), Puducherry (36.6%), Odisha (30.5%) and Gujarat (30.2%). Uttar Pradesh (11,441) had the highest number of inmates detained for a period of 3 to 6 months in terms of absolute numbers followed by Bihar (5,458) and Madhya Pradesh (3,390). The percentage of prisoners detained for a period of 6-12 months was highest in Lakshadweep (63.3%) compared to percentage of prisoners lodged for various time periods. Similar trends prevailed in Uttarakhand (29.1%) and Goa (25.2%). Uttar Pradesh has reported the highest (10,232) number of undertrial prisoners detained for a period of 6 months to 1 year followed by Bihar (5,088). A&N Islands has reported the highest percentage (33.7%) of undertrial prisoners for 1 to 2 years followed by Goa (23.5%), Maharashtra (20.7%) and Jammu & Kashmir (20.4%). In terms of absolute numbers, Uttar Pradesh (7,594) followed by Maharashtra (3,325) reported the highest number of undertrial prisoners detained for a period more than one year but less than two years. Uttar Pradesh (4,127) has reported the highest number of inmates detained for a period of 2 to 3 years followed by Bihar (1,520). The percentage of undertrial prisoners detained for 2 to 3 years was less than 10% of the total undertrials in all the States/UTs except Jammu & Kashmir (13.7%), Goa (12.8%), Uttarakhand (10.4%) and Arunachal Pradesh (10.2%). D&N Haveli, Daman & Diu, Lakshadweep and Puducherry have reported nil percentage. A total of 7,615 undertrial prisoners were lodged beyond 3 years and upto 5 years at the end of the year 2011. There were 2,879 such undertrial prisoners in Uttar Pradesh followed by Bihar (830), West Bengal (497), Delhi (471) and Rajasthan (416). The highest percentage of undertrial prisoners detained for more than three years but less than five years was reported from Jammu & Kashmir (11.6%) followed by Gujarat (5.6%), Goa (5.5%) and Delhi & Uttar Pradesh (5.3% each). 1,486 undertrials were detained in jails for 5 years or more in the country. The highest number of such undertrial prisoners were reported from Uttar Pradesh where 340 undertrials were lodged in various jails for over 5 years, which accounted for 22.9% of such prisoners at the national level, followed by Bihar (252, 17.0%) and West Bengal (204, 13.7%). 111
Page 3:
PRISON STATISTICS INDIA 2011 Nation
Page 8 and 9:
are summarised in Snapshots. In kee
Page 10 and 11:
OFFICERS & OFFICIALS ASSOCIATED WIT
Page 12 and 13:
DISCLAIMER • The information publ
Page 14 and 15:
Murder alone accounted for 58.0% (6
Page 16 and 17:
Rate of change in number of Undertr
Page 18 and 19:
DISTRICT JAILS IN INDIA DURING 2011
Page 20 and 21:
WOMEN JAILS IN INDIA DURING 2011 Ja
Page 22 and 23:
OCCUPANCY RATE AS ON 31.12.2011 Jam
Page 24 and 25:
UNDERTRIALS IN INDIA AS ON 31.12.20
Page 26 and 27:
FEMALE UNDERTRIALS AS ON 31.12.2011
Page 28 and 29:
MENTALLY ILL PRISONERS AS ON 31.12.
Page 30 and 31:
Chapter & Table No. 3.7 Title C O N
Page 32 and 33:
Chapter & Table No. Title C O N T E
Page 34 and 35:
Punjab (8,614), Rajasthan (8,118),
Page 36 and 37:
Number of Total Jails in States and
Page 38 and 39:
Total Capacity of All Central Jails
Page 40 and 41:
Total Capacity of All Sub Jails in
Page 42 and 43:
SL. NO. TABLE - 1.2 STATE/UT WISE D
Page 44 and 45:
TABLE - 1.4 CATEGORY WISE DISTRIBUT
Page 46 and 47:
Age Group-wise Distribution of diff
Page 48 and 49:
It is evident as per the informatio
Page 50 and 51:
18 168.8 222.7 256.3 237.0 194.0 17
Page 52 and 53:
SL. NO TABLE - 2.1 CAPACITY OF JAIL
Page 54 and 55:
SL. NO. TABLE - 2.3 CAPACITY AND PO
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
undertrial prisoners in various jai
Page 64 and 65:
prisoners in the country followed b
Page 66 and 67:
34 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
Page 68 and 69:
TABLE - 3.2 STATE/UT-WISE DISTRIBUT
Page 70 and 71:
TABLE - 3.3 (Concluded) SL. STATE/U
Page 72 and 73:
TABLE - 3.5 STATE/UT-WISE AND SEX-W
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
TABLE - 3.8 STATE/UT-WISE DISTRIBUT
Page 80 and 81:
TABLE - 3.9 (Concluded) SL. NO. STA
Page 82 and 83:
TABLE - 3.10 (Concluded) SL. NO. ST
Page 84 and 85:
TABLE - 3.11 (Concluded) SL. NO. ST
Page 86 and 87:
TABLE 3.12 (Concluded) SL. NO. STAT
Page 88 and 89:
TABLE - 3.13 (Concluded) SL. NO STA
Page 90 and 91:
TABLE - 3.15 STATE/UT-WISE DISTRIBU
Page 92 and 93: TABLE - 3.16 STATE/UT-WISE PERCENTA
Page 94 and 95: TABLE - 3.17 (Concluded) SL. NO. ST
Page 96 and 97: TABLE - 3.19 STATE/UT-WISE DISTRIBU
Page 98 and 99: TABLE - 3.20 STATE/UT-WISE PERCENTA
Page 102 and 103: TABLE - 3.23 STATE/UT-WISE DISTRIBU
Page 104 and 105: SL. NO. STATE/UT TABLE - 3.25 INCID
Page 106 and 107: eported from Uttar Pradesh while lo
Page 108 and 109: Distribution of Convict Prisoners u
Page 110 and 111: 4638 ANDHRA PRADESH 8544 6 ARUNACHA
Page 112 and 113: TABLE - 4.1 (Continued) SL. NO. STA
Page 114 and 115: TABLE - 4.2 STATE/UT-WISE NUMBER OF
Page 116 and 117: TABLE - 4.2 (Concluded) CONSER- VAT
Page 120 and 121: TABLE - 4.4 STATE/UT-WISE NUMBER OF
Page 122 and 123: TABLE - 4.4 (Concluded) CONSER- VAT
Page 124 and 125: TABLE - 4.6 DETAILS OF UNDERTRIALS
Page 126 and 127: TABLE - 4.8 DETAILS OF PERSONS RELE
Page 128 and 129: 91.6% undertrial prisoners were fou
Page 130 and 131: Caste-wise Distribution of Inmates
Page 134 and 135: TABLE - 5.2 DEMOGRAPHIC PARTICULARS
Page 136 and 137: TABLE - 5.2 (Concluded) SL. NO. STA
Page 140 and 141: TABLE - 5.4 DEMOGRAPHIC PARTICULARS
Page 144 and 145: Percentage Distribution of Undertri
Page 146 and 147: TABLE - 6.1 NUMBER OF UNDERTRIAL PR
Page 148 and 149: SL. NO . TABLE - 6.2 PERCENTAGE OF
Page 150 and 151: Percentage Distribution of Convicts
Page 152 and 153: 120 Gender-wise Life Imprisonment C
Page 156 and 157: SL. NO. TABLE - 7.2 PERCENTAGE OF C
Page 158 and 159: SL. NO. STATE/UT TABLE - 7.3 DETAIL
Page 160 and 161: Table 8(A) Vocational Training Avai
Page 162 and 163: 130 Chart 8.3 Inmate Population vs
Page 164 and 165: TABLE - 8.2 STATE/UT-WISE VALUE OF
Page 166 and 167: State/UT-wise Natural Deaths of Inm
Page 168 and 169: TABLE - 9.2 STATE/UT-WISE INCIDENCE
Page 170 and 171: TABLE - 10.1 STATE/UT-WISE NUMBER O
Page 172 and 173: administration of jail institutions
Page 174 and 175: Percentage of Various type of Jail
Page 176 and 177: Sanctioned & Actual Strength of Jai
Page 178 and 179: TABLE - 11.1 SANCTIONED AND ACTUAL
Page 180 and 181: TABLE - 11.1 (Continued) SL. STATE/
Page 184 and 185: TABLE - 11.2 (Concluded) SL. NO STA
Page 186 and 187: TABLE - 11.4 DETAILS OF QUARTERS AV
Page 188 and 189: TABLE - 11.4 (Concluded) SL. STATE/
Page 190 and 191: Plan Expenditure and Non-Plan Expen
Page 192 and 193:
17902.8 15628.3 160 17582.2 13551.0
Page 194 and 195:
162 Chart 12.4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 63 5
Page 196 and 197:
TABLE - 12.2 STATE/UT-WISE DETAILS
Page 198 and 199:
TABLE - 12.4 DETAILS OF ELECTRONIC
Page 200 and 201:
SL. NO. STATE/UT TABLE - M.2 DETAIL
Page 202 and 203:
TABLE - M.4 INCIDENCE OF JAIL BREAK
Page 204 and 205:
TABLE - M.5 (Concluded) SL. NO. STA
Page 206 and 207:
SL. NO. TABLE - M.7 DETAILS OF EDUC
Page 209:
Sender(s) Name & Full Address (Opti
show all

prison statistics india 2011 - National Crime Records Bureau

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?