30.01.2015 Views

PFR - Aerospace Engineering Sciences Senior Design Projects ...

PFR - Aerospace Engineering Sciences Senior Design Projects ...

PFR - Aerospace Engineering Sciences Senior Design Projects ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Project Final Report – CUDBF April 30 th , 2009<br />

ASEN 4028: <strong>Aerospace</strong> <strong>Senior</strong> <strong>Projects</strong><br />

The wing tip displacement was also compared with the COSMOSWorks FEM prediction<br />

together in Figure 120. The measured values are in red asterisks and the FEM predicted<br />

displacement is shown in black line. The model agrees with the measured deflection closely,<br />

especially below a lift load of 30 lbs. The 3g, or 23.5 lbs, predicted deflection of 0.69 inches<br />

agrees exceptionally well with the measured value of 0.71 inches, thus validating the FEM model<br />

of the wing used within COSMOSWorks. The maximum breaking load of the wing was<br />

recorded as 56 lbs, approximately 7.5 g’s; far exceeding the design required 3 g minimum wing<br />

loading. The recorded maximum displacement before failure was 2.25 inches at the wing tip,<br />

and 1.03 inches at the hinge location.<br />

Total Deflection at Tip and Hinge Locations, (in)<br />

2.5<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

Wing Loading Recorded Tip and Hinge Displacements with Error Bars<br />

Wing Tip Deflection (Max = 2.25")<br />

FEM Modeled Wing Tip Deflection<br />

Hinge Point Deflection (Max = 1.03")<br />

-0.5<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50 60<br />

Loaded Weight = Total Lift of Wing Half, (lbs)<br />

Figure 120: Wing Tip and Hinge location Displacement vs. Loading Plot with FEM Model Predicted<br />

Displacement<br />

13.1.4 Avionics Subsystem Verification and Validation<br />

In order to verify that the microcontroller was ready to be used in competition, two tests were<br />

conducted. The first test was to determine if the battery could power the circuit board for the<br />

duration of the missions. The battery was composed of three 1.5V watch batteries soldered<br />

together. A code was programmed to the PIC (Programmable Integrated Circuit) to continuously<br />

run. It was determined that the battery could supply sufficient power for 90 minutes and since<br />

the missions were only ten minutes in duration, the battery was deemed reliable. The second test<br />

was to determine if the microcontroller could receive false signals and release the payloads if the<br />

plane were in flight. The microcontroller was programmed with the complete flight code and the<br />

137

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!