30.01.2015 Views

PFR - Aerospace Engineering Sciences Senior Design Projects ...

PFR - Aerospace Engineering Sciences Senior Design Projects ...

PFR - Aerospace Engineering Sciences Senior Design Projects ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Project Final Report – CUDBF April 30 th , 2009<br />

ASEN 4028: <strong>Aerospace</strong> <strong>Senior</strong> <strong>Projects</strong><br />

7.2.2 Avionics<br />

Should the pilot, while operating an in-flight aircraft, lose radio communication to the vehicle<br />

due to Radio Frequency Interference (RFI) the aircraft will crash. However, this probability is<br />

low because of the transmitter selection. Because the operating frequency is 2.4 GHz, no other<br />

radios can operate on the same channel and interfere with the communication with the Buff-2<br />

Bomber. Also the selected transmitter has a programmable failsafe. If for some reason the<br />

communication with the vehicle fails, the receiver will automatically cut throttle and deflect the<br />

control surfaces to bring the aircraft down.<br />

7.2.3 Propulsion<br />

The propulsion sub-team must be most worried about whether or not their selected motor and<br />

battery configuration can propel the aircraft far enough to complete each mission. If the total<br />

range is insufficient to complete four laps at maximum weight, the consequence is no score and<br />

ultimately no chance of winning the competition. Fortunately this is a lower level probability as<br />

much analysis and testing has been done to accurately calculate the actual thrust provided from<br />

the motors. Further mitigation will involve dynamic testing of the entire propulsion system.<br />

7.2.4 Structures<br />

The wingtip hinge design is necessary for the aircraft to fit into the storage container. However,<br />

“breaking” the wing along the span increases the possibility of a catastrophic failure during flight<br />

that results in competition failure and possible endangerment of bystanders. Because of the<br />

mechanical complexity, the wingtip hinge presents the most probable and dangerous risk the<br />

aircraft faces. However, much of the risks associated with this design aspect can and will be<br />

mitigated with extensive ground testing. The overall strength of the hinge system and its ability<br />

to restrict free-play will be optimized before the system is tested in flight.<br />

7.2.5 Missions<br />

Tasked with designing the release mechanism of the wing mounted stores, the missions sub-team<br />

was able to determine their most significant risk to mission success is the possibility of the<br />

release mechanism jamming or failing during the mission. This possibility is mid-to low range<br />

simply because extensive testing will be done on the prototype and final design to ensure that the<br />

mechanism can release the stores with a 95% success rate. Another primary risk is if the rules,<br />

which undergo constant upgrades and explanations, may soon not allow magnetic mechanisms to<br />

hold the payloads to the wing. Although a low risk, this will be mitigated by not abandoning the<br />

mechanical design system and holding it as a backup to the magnetic system.<br />

7.2.6 Microcontroller<br />

Implementing the microcontroller creates additional risks to the overall avionics subsystem. The<br />

microcontroller is only enabled when the pilot gives the appropriate input on the transmitter;<br />

however, it is possible that the microcontroller receives a false reading and activates while the<br />

plane is in flight. The probability of this situation occurring will be fairly low as safety features<br />

58

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!