30.01.2015 Views

PFR - Aerospace Engineering Sciences Senior Design Projects ...

PFR - Aerospace Engineering Sciences Senior Design Projects ...

PFR - Aerospace Engineering Sciences Senior Design Projects ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Project Final Report – CUDBF April 30 th , 2009<br />

ASEN 4028: <strong>Aerospace</strong> <strong>Senior</strong> <strong>Projects</strong><br />

distance and risk going off the runway and destroying the aircraft. The flight was not scrubbed<br />

because we could still gather the average battery power draw once airborne, and the pilot could<br />

still get experience flying at the maximum payload weight.<br />

The pilot was able to get airborne in 150 ft by slowly accelerating up to takeoff speed. Once<br />

airborne, the pilot did some maneuvering, flew one competition lap, and landed. The average<br />

power draw was 332 W, less than the 350 W of power draw. This was very significant because<br />

this proved that the aircraft could indeed make the four lap range with the full water bottle<br />

payload. A plot of power usage versus time is shown in Figure 138.<br />

800<br />

Power Usage<br />

700<br />

600<br />

Power Usage (W)<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

0<br />

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160<br />

Time (seconds)<br />

Figure 138: Power draw for full water bottle payload flight<br />

13.2.2.13 Flight Test #20<br />

The goal of flight test #20 was to fly the aircraft with what would be the best case single rocket<br />

asymmetric load; one rocket inboard on one wing, and no rockets on the other wing. This led to a<br />

lateral CG shift of 4.0”.<br />

On takeoff roll, there was a strong pull to the left (the side on which the asymmetric rocket was<br />

placed). The aircraft almost went off the runway, so the pilot applied full up elevator in order to<br />

lift off before going off the runway. The aircraft rolled more than 90°, stalled, and impacted the<br />

ground. The left wingtip was broken in half, along with damaged motor mounts and propellers.<br />

The cause of the accident was traced to the fact that the asymmetric load on one wingtip caused<br />

one of the main gear to compress significantly, causing the aircraft to pull to the left and almost<br />

go off the runway. The full up elevator applied in order to make the aircraft takeoff only<br />

exacerbated the turn and led to the stall. The pilot also regretted not using opposite aileron during<br />

151

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!