08.02.2015 Views

Th`ese Marouan BOUALI - Sites personnels de TELECOM ParisTech

Th`ese Marouan BOUALI - Sites personnels de TELECOM ParisTech

Th`ese Marouan BOUALI - Sites personnels de TELECOM ParisTech

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

112 5. Application : Restoration of Aqua MODIS Band 6<br />

Figure 5.1 – (Left) Image from Aqua MODIS band 6 showing 4 non functional <strong>de</strong>tectors<br />

(Right) Image from Aqua band 6 after removal of missing lines : functional <strong>de</strong>tectors are<br />

contaminated with stripe noise<br />

approaches related to the analysis of snow cover use the Normalized Difference Snow In<strong>de</strong>x<br />

(NDSI). This in<strong>de</strong>x exploits snow high reflectivity in the visible (0.5-0.7 µm) and its low<br />

reflectance in the SWIR (1-4 µm). Defined as a spectral band ratio, the NDSI allows a<br />

robust separation of snow from clouds and also reduces the influence of atmospheric effects<br />

and viewing geometry [Salomonson and Appel]. On MODIS, the NDSI can be expressed<br />

as the difference of reflectances ρ measured in the visible band 4 (0.555 µm) and a SWIR<br />

band such as band 6 divi<strong>de</strong>d by the sum of the two reflectances :<br />

NDSI 16 = ρ 4 − ρ 6<br />

ρ 4 + ρ 6<br />

(5.1)<br />

The evaluation of the NDSI in<strong>de</strong>x on the Aqua sensor is problematic due to the non<br />

functional <strong>de</strong>tectors. Nevertheless, to ensure complementary observations to Terra MODIS<br />

band 6 and provi<strong>de</strong> continuous monitoring and mapping of snow coverage, scientists have<br />

relied on Aqua MODIS band 7 (2.105-2.155 µm). This is a reasonnable alternative, given<br />

that snow has similar reflectance properties over bands 6 and 7, which happen to display a<br />

high correlation over land surfaces. As a result, Aqua-based snow coverage is <strong>de</strong>termined<br />

using a secondary NDSI <strong>de</strong>fined as :<br />

NDSI 17 = ρ 4 − ρ 7<br />

ρ 4 + ρ 7<br />

(5.2)<br />

It was however pointed out in [Hall et al.], that the reflectance of snow is slightly weaker<br />

in band 7 compared to band 6. Consequently, values of NDSI 17 are higher than NDSI 16<br />

and the estimation of snow coverage is compromised. Given the importance of retrieving

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!