29.03.2015 Views

PLENTIFUL ENERGY

PLENTIFUL ENERGY

PLENTIFUL ENERGY

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

For the other actinides, and plutonium in particular, there is an added constraint.<br />

Although the action of lithium metal on the actinide oxides like PuO 2 has free<br />

energies of formation of Li 2 O of similar magnitude to UO 2 (and also negative), and<br />

thus would be expected to reduce completely to their metals, they may not do so. If<br />

the concentration of Li 2 O dissolved in the electrolyte is too high, an intermediate<br />

oxide compound will form, Pu 2 O 3 , instead of the reduction going right on to metal.<br />

This compound has a positive ΔG for Li 2 O formation (about +4.5 kcal/mol), and<br />

thus the action of lithium metal on it will not reduce it further. The way around this<br />

problem is to avoid forming the compound in the first place. By maintaining the<br />

Li 2 O concentration in the LiCl salt to less than 3.3 w% throughout the reduction<br />

process, the intermediate compound is avoided and the reduction goes directly to<br />

the metal, as desired.<br />

It may be noted that the oxides of several of the rare earth fission products have<br />

limits on the Li 2 O as well, some well below the concentrations necessary for the<br />

actinides. To reduce rare earths, the Li 2 O concentration needs to be lowered into the<br />

0.1% range. The decomposition potential of Li 2 O rises as the concentration is<br />

lowered, and these concentrations bring the Li 2 O decomposition potential close to<br />

those necessary for LiCl decomposition, which could result in undesirable chlorine<br />

gas evolution. Where these fission product oxides are not reduced, they remain as<br />

oxides in the waste. Fortunately, most of the rare earth fission products are formed<br />

as metal in the UO 2 matrix, and therefore do not need to be reduced.<br />

10.2.4. The Equipment<br />

The principle of electrolytic reduction equipment is schematically illustrated in<br />

Figure 10-1. At the anode oxygen gas is swept from the cell. The cathode process<br />

yields metallic product that will then be electrorefined. In fact, the cathode basket in<br />

the reduction step can be directly transferred to the electrorefiner as the anode<br />

basket for the next step.<br />

Engineering-scale reduction cells were designed and fabricated, and they are<br />

currently used to understand the parameters for process scaleup. In particular the<br />

effect of cathode bed thickness and oxygen removal/handling on the extent and rate<br />

of reduction are being examined. These cells are operated at a one-kilogram scale<br />

using depleted UO 2 feed. The engineering-scale tests will provide electrochemical<br />

engineering data needed for design and modeling of pilot-scale cells. So far, the<br />

tests have shown significant improvements, ~40% to ~65% in current efficiency,<br />

while producing a high quality metallic product. Although most of the cell studies<br />

have used a platinum anode, several inert ceramic materials are being evaluated as<br />

alternatives to costly platinum as well.<br />

214

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!