29.03.2015 Views

PLENTIFUL ENERGY

PLENTIFUL ENERGY

PLENTIFUL ENERGY

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

mistake let the power increase too far, and a portion of the football-sized core<br />

melted. Radioactivity was detected in the control room. However, there was no<br />

explosion, little damage outside the core, and no injuries. The reactor was cleaned<br />

up, and in 1962, it became the first reactor ever to operate with a plutonium-fueled<br />

core. It had served its purpose, however; EBR-II was coming into operation, and<br />

EBR-I was officially shut down in December of 1963. It was designated a National<br />

Historic Landmark by President Johnson in 1966. It can be visited today, and is<br />

something of a tourist attraction. It is well worth a visit by anyone travelling<br />

through eastern Idaho, perhaps on the way to Yellowstone or to Sun Valley.<br />

EBR-I had been designed and built by a remarkably small number of engineers,<br />

all young—in their twenties and thirties—and numbering about a dozen in all.<br />

Several went on to lead the design and construction of EBR-II. But EBR-II was not<br />

only the logical next step in the scale up of the breeder reactor, it was a trail-blazing<br />

concept in itself. By the time it was shut down, for purely political reasons that<br />

we‘ll go into later, it had forged a proud history, and it too had a large number of<br />

firsts to its credit. It had incorporated many sound insights. One of the EBR-I young<br />

engineers, Len Koch, became the Director of the EBR-II Project. In its early days<br />

EBR-II was referred to as ―The Koch Machine,‖ which gives a hint as to the<br />

importance of Koch to the project (as well as the pronunciation of the director‘s<br />

name).<br />

EBR-II was a scale up in power by a factor of sixty or so from EBR-I, but unlike<br />

EBR-I, it was no test reactor. This was a power plant, and a complete one,<br />

producing 20 MW of electricity, supplying power to the site and power for sale to<br />

the appropriate utility. In a major first, it had an on-site facility for processing its<br />

own spent fuel and fabricating new fuel with it. Processing was done without<br />

delaying to allow the spent fuel to ―cool‖; the fuel was returned to the reactor ―hot,‖<br />

highly radioactive. (Figure 1-11)<br />

In another major first, EBR-II was given a ―pool configuration‖. In a pool, all the<br />

radioactive components—the core itself, of course, but also the associated piping<br />

and equipment that circulates sodium coolant through the core, and whose sodium<br />

is radioactive as a result—are immersed in a large pool of sodium coolant. (Figure<br />

1-12) This is easy to do with liquid sodium coolant because it needs no<br />

pressurization (unlike in water-moderated reactors). It is liquid at low temperatures<br />

(97 o C, about the boiling point of water) at room pressure, and stays liquid without<br />

pressurization at temperatures far above operating temperatures of a reactor. No<br />

pressure containment is needed for the primary tank; it can be made any size<br />

desired. No need for the thick walls of the pressure vessels needed to hold water in<br />

a liquid state at reactor operating temperatures in a water-cooled reactor. This<br />

feature has many advantages, not least of which is that any leaks of sodium over the<br />

reactor lifetime would not involve radioactive sodium. We‘ll go into that, and the<br />

other advantages, in a later chapter.<br />

24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!