29.03.2015 Views

PLENTIFUL ENERGY

PLENTIFUL ENERGY

PLENTIFUL ENERGY

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the pool was a settled issue; it was to be a key feature along with metal fuel and<br />

pyroprocessing.<br />

The ten-year IFR era was a very exciting time indeed at Argonne. Although<br />

there were political challenges from the beginning, on the technical front the new<br />

discoveries and pioneering nature of the development brought an era of high<br />

morale, dedication, and enthusiasm in everyone involved. There was very little<br />

extra funding for a project this ambitious, but we made up for the shoe-string<br />

budgets with effort, imagination, creativity, and drive.<br />

A good example, right at the beginning, was the means for plutonium fuel<br />

fabrication. The EBR-II driver fuel contained no plutonium, and to start irradiation<br />

testing of the new IFR fuel alloy, we had to have a fabrication capability for<br />

plutonium-bearing fuel. There was no such capability by then at the Laboratory, so<br />

the first option we looked at was to rely on the plutonium fabrication facility at Los<br />

Alamos National Laboratory. Their schedule was not ours. Schedule was a very big<br />

concern to us. We needed to get on with it, and quickly. I asked Leon Walters, who<br />

was heading the fuels effort of the IFR Program, to estimate how long it would take<br />

to construct a new plutonium glove box fabrication facility at Argonne-West. He<br />

came back with a three-month schedule estimate. We proceeded with that plan,<br />

rather than pursue the LANL option. At the mid-point of this construction project,<br />

the DOE program manager visited the site to review its progress. He commented<br />

that there was no way we could make the schedule, and I had to agree because the<br />

work site was chaotic. But the project was completed on time, actually with a few<br />

days to spare. Walters told me that everyone was so motivated to complete the<br />

project on schedule that they worked especially effectively, including weekends<br />

throughout. A plutonium fabrication capability, starting with nothing, had been put<br />

in place in three short months.<br />

EBR-II driver fuel at that time was fabricated in a small room in the old Fuel<br />

Cycle Facility building. The DOE safeguards office didn‘t think highly enriched<br />

uranium was secure there and provided funding specifically for construction of a<br />

fully safeguarded fuel manufacturing facility. I wanted to take advantage of the<br />

funding offered in this situation to alter the fabrication equipment design to increase<br />

the batch size from five kg to twenty kg so we could demonstrate the scalability of<br />

the process to higher throughputs. The fabrication people had been accustomed to<br />

the lower throughput and were somewhat reluctant initially, but eventually agreed<br />

to a twenty-kg batch capability with two crucibles of ten kg each, limited by<br />

criticality constraints. This turned out to be invaluable later, when this new Fuel<br />

Manufacturing Facility (FMF) proved able to supply metal fuel not only for EBR-<br />

II, but for FFTF as well. The Semi-Automated Fabrication (SAF) line at Hanford,<br />

originally built to supply MOX fuel for CRBR, wasn‘t complete, and it still<br />

required substantial funding. Supplying metal fuel from FMF required little<br />

funding. DOE made the obvious decision to convert the FFTF core to metal fuel<br />

73

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!