29.03.2015 Views

PLENTIFUL ENERGY

PLENTIFUL ENERGY

PLENTIFUL ENERGY

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Eventually the amount of product will build up enough that the backward rate<br />

(and there will always be a backward rate) equals the forward rate of product<br />

formation. The backward rate—the rate at which the product of a reaction<br />

dissociates into the original components of the reaction—may be small, as we have<br />

noted. In fact it may be microscopically small, and present only due to highly<br />

unlikely statistical fluctuations. But equality of forward and backward rates comes<br />

when the concentrations of reactants have so decreased and the amount of product<br />

has so increased that the two rates overall are equal. In those reactions where the<br />

backward rate is extremely small and present only because of statistical<br />

fluctuations, reactions go to almost perfect completion. And where clean<br />

separations are important, that's what is wanted.<br />

A fission product can go entirely (well, almost) into the electrolyte and stay there<br />

because this is the equilibrium result. And importantly, we can calculate its<br />

distribution—where it is and in what quantity. Equating the forward and backward<br />

rates, and taking the ratio of the two gives the ―equilibrium constant.‖ From the<br />

equilibrium constant we can predict the degree of separation of each element, and<br />

that is exactly what the IFR chemists do, in a computer program that handles<br />

the multitude of elements.<br />

To the present time, the rates of electrorefining do not appear to affect the<br />

assumption of equilibrium, at least to the accuracy the distributions could be<br />

measured. Running the process faster may bring in issues that lessen the accuracy<br />

of the equilibrium assumption. Today the process can be run fast enough to be<br />

practical, and equilibrium distributions seem to hold but the rates at present may not<br />

be optimal. Eventually there may be economic pressure to run the process faster,<br />

perhaps to a point where the kinetics of the process do become important.<br />

The things that matter to the rate of a reaction are not surprising: They are the<br />

concentrations of the reactants, or rather the concentrations that actually contribute<br />

effectively to the reaction, along with the factor that accounts for the fraction of<br />

molecules actually having high enough energies to surmount the activation barrier.<br />

Concentrations are relevant because reactions depend on collisions taking place,<br />

and the more tightly packed the reactants are—the higher the concentrations—the<br />

more collisions there will be. And the factor that accounts for the necessity of<br />

molecular energies to equal or exceed the activation energy is just the familiar<br />

Arrhenius exponential, exp(-Ea/RT).<br />

The rate of a reaction then is given by the relationship Aexp(-Ea/RT) multiplied<br />

by the concentrations contributing to the reaction. In this expression A is a constant<br />

(the pre-exponential constant) which cancels out in the important concept that we<br />

have been coming to—that of the equilibrium constant.<br />

358

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!