going-clear-scientology-hollywood-and-the-prison-of-belief-by-lawrence-wright-2
going-clear-scientology-hollywood-and-the-prison-of-belief-by-lawrence-wright-2
going-clear-scientology-hollywood-and-the-prison-of-belief-by-lawrence-wright-2
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
according to categories, such as “Disappearance <strong>of</strong> L. Ron Hubbard,” “Tom Cruise,”<br />
“Gold Base,” <strong>and</strong> “Haggis’s Involvement in Scientology.” Davis emphasized that <strong>the</strong><br />
church had gone to extraordinary lengths to prepare for this meeting. “Frankly, <strong>the</strong> only<br />
thing I can think that compares would be <strong>the</strong> presentation that we made in <strong>the</strong> early<br />
1990s to <strong>the</strong> IRS.”<br />
We sat around a large blond conference table with <strong>the</strong> kaleidoscopic lights <strong>of</strong> Times<br />
Square garishly whirling in <strong>the</strong> background. I particularly recall <strong>the</strong> Dunkin’ Donuts sign<br />
over Davis’s shoulder as he began his presentation. First, he ruled out any discussion <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> church’s condential scripture. He compared it to “shoving an image <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Prophet<br />
Mohammed in <strong>the</strong> face <strong>of</strong> a Muslim” or “insisting that a Jew eat pork.” He <strong>the</strong>n attacked<br />
<strong>the</strong> credibility <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sources for <strong>the</strong> piece, whom he called “bitter apostates.”<br />
“They are unreliable,” he said. “They make up stories.” He produced a paper <strong>by</strong> Bryan<br />
Wilson, who was an eminent Oxford sociologist <strong>and</strong> prominent defender <strong>of</strong> new<br />
religious movements (he died in 2004). Wilson argues that testimony from disaected<br />
members should be treated skeptically, noting, “The apostate is generally in need <strong>of</strong><br />
self-justication. He seeks to reconstruct his own past to excuse his former aliations<br />
<strong>and</strong> to blame those who were formerly his closest associates.… He is likely to be<br />
suggestible <strong>and</strong> ready to enlarge or embellish his grievances to satisfy that species <strong>of</strong><br />
journalist whose interest is more in sensational copy than in an objective statement <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> truth.” Davis had highlighted <strong>the</strong> last part for my benefit.<br />
As an example, Davis singled out Gerald Armstrong, <strong>the</strong> former Scientology archivist,<br />
who received an $800,000 settlement in a fraud suit against <strong>the</strong> church in 1986. Davis<br />
charged that Armstrong had forged many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> documents that he later disseminated in<br />
order to discredit <strong>the</strong> church’s founder, although he produced no evidence to substantiate<br />
that allegation. He passed around a photograph <strong>of</strong> Armstrong, which, he said, showed<br />
Armstrong “sitting naked” with a giant globe in his lap. “This was a photo that was in a<br />
newspaper article he did where he said that all people should give up money,” Davis<br />
said. “He’s not a very sane person.” 6<br />
Davis also displayed photographs <strong>of</strong> what he said were bruises sustained <strong>by</strong> Mike<br />
Rinder’s former wife in 2010, after Rinder physically assaulted her in a Florida parking<br />
lot. 7 Davis <strong>the</strong>n showed a mug shot <strong>of</strong> Marty Rathbun in a jailhouse jumpsuit, after<br />
being detained in New Orleans in July 2010 for public drunkenness. “Getting arrested<br />
for being drunk on <strong>the</strong> intersection <strong>of</strong> Bourbon <strong>and</strong> Toulouse?” Davis cracked. “That’s<br />
like getting arrested for being a leper in a leper colony.” O<strong>the</strong>r defectors, such as Claire<br />
<strong>and</strong> Marc Headley, were “<strong>the</strong> most despicable people in <strong>the</strong> world.” Jeerson Hawkins<br />
was “an inveterate liar.”<br />
If <strong>the</strong>se people were so reprehensible, I asked, how had <strong>the</strong>y all arrived at such<br />
elevated positions in <strong>the</strong> church?<br />
“They weren’t like that when <strong>the</strong>y were in those positions,” Davis replied.<br />
The defectors we were discussing had not only risen to positions <strong>of</strong> responsibility<br />
within <strong>the</strong> church; <strong>the</strong>y had also ascended Scientology’s ladder <strong>of</strong> spiritual<br />
accomplishment. I suggested that Scientology didn’t seem to be eective if people at <strong>the</strong><br />
highest levels <strong>of</strong> spiritual attainment were actually liars, adulterers, wife beaters,