26.04.2015 Views

Electromagnetic Testing

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 1.8 is again useful to illustrate discontinuity response because of<br />

current distribution. As an example, consider testing a nonferromagnetic tube<br />

at a frequency that establishes a standard depth of penetration at the<br />

midpoint of the tube wall. This condition would allow a relative current density<br />

of about 20% on the far surface of the tube. With this condition, identical near<br />

and far surface discontinuities would have greatly different responses. Due to<br />

current magnitude alone, the near surface discontinuity response would be<br />

nearly five times that of the far surface discontinuity.<br />

Discontinuity orientation has a dramatic effect on response. As seen earlier,<br />

discontinuity response is maximum when eddy currents and discontinuities<br />

are at 90 degrees or perpendicular. Discontinuities parallel to the eddy<br />

current flow produce little or no response.<br />

The easiest technique to ensure detectability of discontinuities is to use a<br />

reference standard or model that provides a consistent means of adjusting<br />

instrumentation.<br />

Charlie Chong/ Fion Zhang

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!