03.05.2015 Views

The Archaeology of Britain: An introduction from ... - waughfamily.ca

The Archaeology of Britain: An introduction from ... - waughfamily.ca

The Archaeology of Britain: An introduction from ... - waughfamily.ca

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Preface<br />

<strong>The</strong> idea for the approach taken in this book emerged in late 1994 as the editors compared<br />

wounds that were the outcome <strong>of</strong> their previous collaborative editorial effort. Discussion, typi<strong>ca</strong>l<br />

<strong>of</strong> many <strong>of</strong> the time, included comparing statistics on rising student numbers, and noting the<br />

very different archaeologi<strong>ca</strong>l world—both a<strong>ca</strong>demic and practi<strong>ca</strong>l—that faced the new intakes<br />

<strong>of</strong> students, compared to that which had been encountered some twenty years previously. Talk<br />

then turned to the concomitant need to make readily accessible suitable literature for students at<br />

the outset <strong>of</strong> their undergraduate <strong>ca</strong>reers, in access classes preparing for university entrance, and<br />

for those taking A-level and similar courses and their teachers. <strong>The</strong> format and contents <strong>of</strong> this<br />

book, an attempt to en<strong>ca</strong>psulate the British archaeologi<strong>ca</strong>l record and its present-day interpretation<br />

in an introductory and accessible way, represent the outcome <strong>of</strong> subsequent thoughts, but honed<br />

and improved by anonymous referees, by the various contributors and by the staff at Routledge,<br />

initially Diana Grivas, and subsequently Vicky Peters and Nadia Jacobson.<br />

No work <strong>of</strong> this kind could be put together without a team effort, and the contributions <strong>of</strong><br />

our colleagues, who have authored the substance <strong>of</strong> what follows, were obviously essential for<br />

the completion <strong>of</strong> the project. <strong>The</strong>ir telephone <strong>ca</strong>lls, e-mails and other communi<strong>ca</strong>tions were<br />

also <strong>of</strong> great help in the shaping <strong>of</strong> its contents. To those who contributed swiftly and to<br />

specifi<strong>ca</strong>tion, to those who were not so swift <strong>of</strong>f the mark and required <strong>ca</strong>joling, as well as to the<br />

few who felt the need to draw attention to editorial delays as we sometimes struggled to find time<br />

to fit the compilation <strong>of</strong> this work into other responsibilities, we <strong>of</strong>fer our grateful thanks. We<br />

trust they find the final product to their liking, but any deficiencies still present are our responsibility.<br />

Thanks are also due to our partners, Margaret and Sandra, for once more tolerating the trauma<br />

<strong>of</strong> editing during the evenings and weekends and to Ellie, Natalie, both Toms, Ben and<br />

(intermittently) Edward for putting up with fathers once again preoccupied with other matters.<br />

We hope that the following pages encourage new students and interested amateurs in their<br />

interest and involvement in British archaeology, and that colleagues across the widening spectrum<br />

<strong>of</strong> archaeologi<strong>ca</strong>l endeavour and beyond find value in the contents.<br />

John Hunter and Ian Ralston<br />

Warwickshire—Kinross-shire<br />

August 1997

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!