The Archaeology of Britain: An introduction from ... - waughfamily.ca
The Archaeology of Britain: An introduction from ... - waughfamily.ca
The Archaeology of Britain: An introduction from ... - waughfamily.ca
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
• 250 • Paul Stamper<br />
<strong>The</strong> first point that <strong>ca</strong>n be made is that, traditionally, few historians exhibited any interest<br />
whatsoever in material culture, whether it be the layout <strong>of</strong> a village’s fields, the design <strong>of</strong> its<br />
houses or the range <strong>of</strong> their contents. That was especially so with regard to peasant society, which<br />
was assumed to be (in every sense) rude, crude and unworthy <strong>of</strong> scholarly investigation. In fairness<br />
to historians (and this is the second point), medieval documentary sources tend anyway to touch<br />
only indirectly on these matters. Even after the making <strong>of</strong> written records proliferated in the<br />
thirteenth century, narrative and descriptive passages <strong>of</strong> ordinary life are few and far between,<br />
and most documents are terse, factual memoranda: <strong>of</strong> the transfer <strong>of</strong> property, <strong>of</strong> misdemeanours<br />
and punishments, and <strong>of</strong> grants <strong>of</strong> permissions. If these do mention, say, a house, a mill, or a pig,<br />
it is rare for there to be any descriptive gloss given.<br />
Furthermore, although the mention or otherwise <strong>of</strong> items in documents <strong>ca</strong>n indi<strong>ca</strong>te the date<br />
<strong>of</strong> change—when windmills first appeared or when large-s<strong>ca</strong>le goat keeping declined—they rarely<br />
<strong>of</strong>fer direct explanation. <strong>Archaeology</strong>’s ultimate access to a much larger dataset, and to one with<br />
a degree <strong>of</strong> detail denied the historian, makes the investigation <strong>of</strong> explanation far more feasible.<br />
That such an approach is now possible owes much to a small number <strong>of</strong> scholars who, between<br />
the early 1950s and the 1980s, not only established the techniques for studying the medieval<br />
countryside but also gathered much <strong>of</strong> the evidence and formed many <strong>of</strong> the interpretations that<br />
underpin our understanding <strong>of</strong> it (Hurst 1986). Although as early as the 1840s John Wilson had<br />
ex<strong>ca</strong>vated a medieval village, Woodperry, Oxfordshire, recording foundations, pottery and small<br />
finds, his lead was not followed up; only in the 1930s, when Martyn Jope ex<strong>ca</strong>vated a peasant<br />
house at Great Beere, Devon, and Rupert Bruce-Mitford began to dig at the deserted village <strong>of</strong><br />
Seacourt, Oxfordshire, was there a renewed interest in the possibilities such ex<strong>ca</strong>vations <strong>of</strong>fered.<br />
With survey, a similar pattern <strong>ca</strong>n be seen, <strong>of</strong> early landmarks not pursued. From the 1850s,<br />
Ordnance Survey surveyors were oc<strong>ca</strong>sionally mapping in some detail medieval settlement remains,<br />
although these aroused little comment, while in 1924, O.G.S. Crawford published the first air<br />
photograph <strong>of</strong> a deserted medieval village, Gainsthorpe, Lincolnshire. In terms <strong>of</strong> more holistic<br />
lands<strong>ca</strong>pe work, there was very little, although John Hurst has drawn attention to the work <strong>of</strong><br />
amateurs such as Ethel Rudkin in Lincolnshire, Helen O’Neil in Gloucestershire and Tony Brewster<br />
in Yorkshire, who brought to bear techniques including fieldwalking, air photography, experimental<br />
archaeology, and ex<strong>ca</strong>vation in pioneering individual studies.<br />
Although it is to simplify matters, the publi<strong>ca</strong>tion <strong>of</strong> three books in the mid-1950s provided a<br />
vital <strong>ca</strong>talyst for medieval lands<strong>ca</strong>pe studies. In the 1940s, two economic historians, Maurice<br />
Beresford and William Hoskins, had independently begun to seek out on the ground and on air<br />
photos (the available number <strong>of</strong> which expanded hugely as systematic post-war surveys were<br />
released) medieval and later lands<strong>ca</strong>pes which they had encountered in documents and, in particular,<br />
on hand-drawn estate maps. Beresford’s Lost Villages <strong>of</strong> England appeared in 1954 and his History<br />
on the Ground in 1957, and Hoskins’ Making <strong>of</strong> the English Lands<strong>ca</strong>pe in 1955.<br />
VILLAGES, HAMLETS AND HOUSES<br />
Among the most important points those books established, despite the scepticism <strong>of</strong> some senior<br />
colleagues, was that not only were large numbers <strong>of</strong> villages deserted in the Middle Ages but that<br />
their remains, readily identifiable as earthwork house platforms, hollow ways and banks and<br />
ditches, were to be seen in many parts <strong>of</strong> the country, sometimes in pr<strong>of</strong>usion. However, when<br />
the historians attempted to ex<strong>ca</strong>vate individual houses, the results were disappointing, not least<br />
be<strong>ca</strong>use <strong>of</strong> the primitive methods used. In one celebrated instance, Beresford searched for walls<br />
with a gargantuan coke shovel borrowed <strong>from</strong> the lo<strong>ca</strong>l railway stationmaster.