03.05.2015 Views

The Archaeology of Britain: An introduction from ... - waughfamily.ca

The Archaeology of Britain: An introduction from ... - waughfamily.ca

The Archaeology of Britain: An introduction from ... - waughfamily.ca

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

• 44 • Steven Mithen<br />

<strong>from</strong> work <strong>ca</strong>rried out here in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. <strong>The</strong> two best-recorded<br />

skeletons were found in a crushed state in 1924, associated with beads made <strong>from</strong> pig and red<br />

deer incisors, and red ochre. Fragments <strong>of</strong> bone have been dated to 9,000 BP—surprisingly early<br />

as continental Postglacial cemeteries generally date after 6,500 BP. <strong>The</strong> only complete skeleton<br />

comes <strong>from</strong> Gough’s Cave, also in the Mendips. <strong>The</strong>se remains, <strong>of</strong> a young male, are dated to the<br />

Early Mesolithic or possibly a little earlier. Bryan Sykes <strong>of</strong> Oxford University believes that ancient<br />

mtDNA (see Chapter 2) <strong>from</strong> this skeleton shows a remarkable degree <strong>of</strong> similarity to modern<br />

humans, suggesting direct descent.<br />

Elsewhere, human remains are extremely sparse and fragmentary. A small collection <strong>of</strong> skeletal<br />

elements was recovered <strong>from</strong> the Oronsay middens (Mellars 1987), mostly <strong>from</strong> Cnoc Coig.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se are dominated by head and foot bones which were found dispersed throughout the midden.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y seem to indi<strong>ca</strong>te mainly adults, with one adolescent and one child represented, and do not<br />

appear to derive <strong>from</strong> intentional burials.<br />

Environmental evidence<br />

Environmental evidence for Mesolithic activity comes directly <strong>from</strong> archaeologi<strong>ca</strong>l sites but also<br />

<strong>from</strong> early Postglacial sediments, including those <strong>from</strong> areas where no Mesolithic sites are currently<br />

known (Edwards in Pollard and Morrison 1996). Thus at Loch Lang (South Uist), charcoal, likely<br />

to derive <strong>from</strong> <strong>ca</strong>mpfires, appears in sediments after 9,000 years ago. Throughout the Western<br />

Isles, sediments reveal increased levels <strong>of</strong> microscopic charcoal after 8,000 BP. This may reflect<br />

rising human populations and perhaps deliberate burning <strong>of</strong> vegetation—although until habitation<br />

sites are found, the possibility remains that the fires were natural occurrences during a more arid<br />

period (Tipping in Pollard and Morrison 1996). Changes in vegetation visible in the pollen record<br />

may also indi<strong>ca</strong>te a human presence. At Dalli<strong>ca</strong>n Water (Shetland), for example, a marked reduction<br />

in ferns and tall herbs during the Mesolithic may have resulted <strong>from</strong> grazing. If so, the likely<br />

culprits are red deer: it seems improbable that they could have colonized the Shetland Islands<br />

without having been transported in boats.<br />

Missing evidence<br />

Perhaps the most challenging feature <strong>of</strong> the record is what is known to be missing. Much <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Early Mesolithic coastline has been inundated by the sea and consequently the role <strong>of</strong> coastal<br />

resources during this period remains unclear. Is the earliest date for the Oronsay middens <strong>of</strong> c.<br />

6,300 years ago simply a reflection <strong>of</strong> their survival, or is a major economic change indi<strong>ca</strong>ted at<br />

that time? Similarly there are areas where archaeologists <strong>ca</strong>n be confident that Mesolithic sites<br />

exist, but in highland zones these are deeply buried below peat, or in coastal areas below blown<br />

sand.<br />

<strong>The</strong> rarity <strong>of</strong> well-preserved sites inhibits the interpretation <strong>of</strong> surviving artefacts. Microliths<br />

must have been fixed in wooden or bone armatures, but only a possible pine arrowshaft <strong>from</strong><br />

Seamer Carr (North Yorkshire) has survived. Consequently there is limited information on the<br />

types <strong>of</strong> tools they were used for. Offshore islands were reached, although evidence for boats is<br />

lacking. A possible paddle was found at Star Carr, but elsewhere in Europe large <strong>ca</strong>noes are<br />

known. It must be assumed that similar craft were made here.<br />

Other gaps in the record are more debatable. In the continental Later Mesolithic (Mithen<br />

1994), numerous cemeteries in coastal lo<strong>ca</strong>tions provide evidence for complex burial rituals.<br />

Were such cemeteries created in <strong>Britain</strong>? Aveline’s Hole is the only <strong>ca</strong>ndidate. Similarly, art objects<br />

are almost non-existent, yet are plentiful in Europe. It is difficult to believe that Mesolithic societies<br />

in <strong>Britain</strong> did not engrave bone and antler or <strong>ca</strong>rve on stone. <strong>The</strong> extreme rarity <strong>of</strong> direct evidence<br />

frustrates consideration <strong>of</strong> the non-material aspects <strong>of</strong> Mesolithic lifestyles.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!