The Archaeology of Britain: An introduction from ... - waughfamily.ca
The Archaeology of Britain: An introduction from ... - waughfamily.ca
The Archaeology of Britain: An introduction from ... - waughfamily.ca
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
• 140 • W.S.Hanson<br />
eventually settling down in<br />
permanent fortresses at York,<br />
Caerleon and Chester. <strong>The</strong> bulk <strong>of</strong><br />
the military garrison, however, was<br />
made up <strong>of</strong> auxiliary troops,<br />
including <strong>ca</strong>valry, sub-divided into<br />
units approximately 500 or 1,000<br />
strong. <strong>The</strong>se were non-citizen<br />
soldiers, recruited <strong>from</strong> the<br />
provinces <strong>of</strong> the Empire, who<br />
formed the main front-line and<br />
garrison troops. <strong>The</strong>y were housed<br />
in forts that varied in size<br />
considerably <strong>from</strong> 0.8 to 4 ha in<br />
internal area (Figure 8.5). Three<br />
examples (Elginhaugh, Housesteads<br />
and Vindolanda) are described<br />
below. Indeed, there is still much<br />
debate about the relationship<br />
between auxiliary fort sizes and the<br />
different types <strong>of</strong> unit known,<br />
particularly in relation to the<br />
housing <strong>of</strong> <strong>ca</strong>valry horses inside or<br />
outside the fort. What is becoming<br />
increasingly clear, however, is that<br />
there is no simple correlation<br />
between auxiliary unit and fort, with<br />
units being split between different<br />
forts and/or different units<br />
occupying the same fort. <strong>The</strong><br />
division <strong>of</strong> units is further attested<br />
Figure 8.3 Distribution <strong>of</strong> first-century AD Roman forts in <strong>Britain</strong> (NB not<br />
by the frequency <strong>of</strong> use <strong>of</strong> much<br />
all sites were occupied contemporaneously).<br />
smaller installations, known as<br />
‘fortlets’, usually less than 0.4 ha in<br />
internal area (e.g. Barburgh Mill<br />
below and Figure 8.6a). <strong>The</strong> distinction between a large fortlet and a very small fort <strong>ca</strong>n be<br />
difficult, but the former generally lacks any central administrative buildings.<br />
<strong>The</strong> smallest permanent installations are watchtowers (Figure 8.6b). Though individual examples<br />
do occur, they are usually associated with frontiers and are best known along Hadrian’s Wall (the<br />
so-<strong>ca</strong>lled ‘turrets’) and the Gask frontier in Perthshire, as at Westerton, described below. <strong>The</strong>y are<br />
not infrequently described as signal stations, though whether or not they were used to relay<br />
signals is much debated. Some <strong>ca</strong>pacity to pass on any information gained <strong>from</strong> look-outs would<br />
seem essential, without necessarily implying the existence <strong>of</strong> a system for relaying complex<br />
messages (Southern 1990).<br />
Roman military architecture was remarkably consistent for long periods <strong>of</strong> time. However,<br />
some major changes become apparent <strong>from</strong> the late third century. New forts constructed at<br />
coastal lo<strong>ca</strong>tions around the south-east coast <strong>of</strong> England and in north and south Wales put<br />
greater emphasis on defence. <strong>The</strong>y are provided with massive stone walls and projecting bastions