The Archaeology of Britain: An introduction from ... - waughfamily.ca
The Archaeology of Britain: An introduction from ... - waughfamily.ca
The Archaeology of Britain: An introduction from ... - waughfamily.ca
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter Nine<br />
Roman <strong>Britain</strong><br />
Civil and rural society<br />
Simon Esmonde Cleary<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the briefest <strong>of</strong> the epochs <strong>of</strong> <strong>Britain</strong>’s past, the Roman period is also one <strong>of</strong> the most<br />
recognizable. To the archaeologist, this is be<strong>ca</strong>use it saw the <strong>introduction</strong> <strong>of</strong> important and<br />
distinctive new classes <strong>of</strong> site, monument and artefact. More generally, it is also the period that<br />
bequeathed legacies such as roads and towns that still shape the map <strong>of</strong> <strong>Britain</strong>. It also marks the<br />
intrusion into <strong>Britain</strong> <strong>of</strong> Classi<strong>ca</strong>l culture, the intellectual, literary and architectural vo<strong>ca</strong>bulary <strong>of</strong><br />
which are embedded in modern European idioms. It <strong>ca</strong>n therefore seem comfortingly familiar,<br />
perhaps dangerously so for those whose business it is to investigate the ‘otherness’ <strong>of</strong> the past.<br />
<strong>The</strong> distinctive dataset, links with the wider Classi<strong>ca</strong>l world and some long-standing intellectual<br />
traditions mean that the study <strong>of</strong> Roman <strong>Britain</strong> has <strong>of</strong>ten been rather self-contained. At both<br />
the beginning and the end <strong>of</strong> the Roman period, however, an incoming group imposed itself on<br />
a numeri<strong>ca</strong>lly far superior indigenous population. <strong>The</strong> archaeologi<strong>ca</strong>l distinctiveness <strong>of</strong> Roman<br />
and <strong>of</strong> <strong>An</strong>glo-Saxon material culture (Chapter 10) has meant that perhaps disproportionate effort<br />
has been expended on the minority at the expense <strong>of</strong> the less archaeologi<strong>ca</strong>lly obvious majority.<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the longest standing approaches to the analysis and explanation <strong>of</strong> the archaeology <strong>of</strong><br />
the Roman period has been the concept <strong>of</strong> ‘Romanization’, analysing the nature and process <strong>of</strong><br />
the interaction <strong>of</strong> Roman and indigenous culture to produce the synthesis known as ‘Romano-<br />
British’ (Millett 1990; see also Chapter 8 here). This was not a process whereby the imperial<br />
power imposed its culture, but one where the British population made choices about its relationship<br />
to that power and about how to display those choices through the adoption (or not) <strong>of</strong> Romanstyle<br />
behaviour and its physi<strong>ca</strong>l expressions. This approach <strong>ca</strong>n be undertaken only with an<br />
understanding <strong>of</strong> the Later Iron Age (Chapter 7 here) in order to identify and assess the changes<br />
resulting <strong>from</strong> the Roman conquest. <strong>The</strong> links between the two periods and the transition <strong>from</strong><br />
one to the other are visible in the archaeologi<strong>ca</strong>l record, and currently the increasing emphasis on<br />
the role <strong>of</strong> the indigenous population <strong>ca</strong>n lead to the earlier part <strong>of</strong> the Roman period at least<br />
being seen almost as a continuation <strong>of</strong> the Iron Age by other means.<br />
At the end <strong>of</strong> the Roman period, the interface between Roman <strong>Britain</strong> and Early <strong>An</strong>glo-Saxon<br />
England is much less well studied and understood, for the two material cultures seem to have<br />
nothing in common, reinforcing the impression <strong>of</strong> ethnic, cultural and religious separateness<br />
gained <strong>from</strong> the written sources. More recent research and ex<strong>ca</strong>vation are suggesting, however,