03.05.2015 Views

The Archaeology of Britain: An introduction from ... - waughfamily.ca

The Archaeology of Britain: An introduction from ... - waughfamily.ca

The Archaeology of Britain: An introduction from ... - waughfamily.ca

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter Nine<br />

Roman <strong>Britain</strong><br />

Civil and rural society<br />

Simon Esmonde Cleary<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the briefest <strong>of</strong> the epochs <strong>of</strong> <strong>Britain</strong>’s past, the Roman period is also one <strong>of</strong> the most<br />

recognizable. To the archaeologist, this is be<strong>ca</strong>use it saw the <strong>introduction</strong> <strong>of</strong> important and<br />

distinctive new classes <strong>of</strong> site, monument and artefact. More generally, it is also the period that<br />

bequeathed legacies such as roads and towns that still shape the map <strong>of</strong> <strong>Britain</strong>. It also marks the<br />

intrusion into <strong>Britain</strong> <strong>of</strong> Classi<strong>ca</strong>l culture, the intellectual, literary and architectural vo<strong>ca</strong>bulary <strong>of</strong><br />

which are embedded in modern European idioms. It <strong>ca</strong>n therefore seem comfortingly familiar,<br />

perhaps dangerously so for those whose business it is to investigate the ‘otherness’ <strong>of</strong> the past.<br />

<strong>The</strong> distinctive dataset, links with the wider Classi<strong>ca</strong>l world and some long-standing intellectual<br />

traditions mean that the study <strong>of</strong> Roman <strong>Britain</strong> has <strong>of</strong>ten been rather self-contained. At both<br />

the beginning and the end <strong>of</strong> the Roman period, however, an incoming group imposed itself on<br />

a numeri<strong>ca</strong>lly far superior indigenous population. <strong>The</strong> archaeologi<strong>ca</strong>l distinctiveness <strong>of</strong> Roman<br />

and <strong>of</strong> <strong>An</strong>glo-Saxon material culture (Chapter 10) has meant that perhaps disproportionate effort<br />

has been expended on the minority at the expense <strong>of</strong> the less archaeologi<strong>ca</strong>lly obvious majority.<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the longest standing approaches to the analysis and explanation <strong>of</strong> the archaeology <strong>of</strong><br />

the Roman period has been the concept <strong>of</strong> ‘Romanization’, analysing the nature and process <strong>of</strong><br />

the interaction <strong>of</strong> Roman and indigenous culture to produce the synthesis known as ‘Romano-<br />

British’ (Millett 1990; see also Chapter 8 here). This was not a process whereby the imperial<br />

power imposed its culture, but one where the British population made choices about its relationship<br />

to that power and about how to display those choices through the adoption (or not) <strong>of</strong> Romanstyle<br />

behaviour and its physi<strong>ca</strong>l expressions. This approach <strong>ca</strong>n be undertaken only with an<br />

understanding <strong>of</strong> the Later Iron Age (Chapter 7 here) in order to identify and assess the changes<br />

resulting <strong>from</strong> the Roman conquest. <strong>The</strong> links between the two periods and the transition <strong>from</strong><br />

one to the other are visible in the archaeologi<strong>ca</strong>l record, and currently the increasing emphasis on<br />

the role <strong>of</strong> the indigenous population <strong>ca</strong>n lead to the earlier part <strong>of</strong> the Roman period at least<br />

being seen almost as a continuation <strong>of</strong> the Iron Age by other means.<br />

At the end <strong>of</strong> the Roman period, the interface between Roman <strong>Britain</strong> and Early <strong>An</strong>glo-Saxon<br />

England is much less well studied and understood, for the two material cultures seem to have<br />

nothing in common, reinforcing the impression <strong>of</strong> ethnic, cultural and religious separateness<br />

gained <strong>from</strong> the written sources. More recent research and ex<strong>ca</strong>vation are suggesting, however,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!