Looking Glass River Watershed Management Plan - Greater ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

9. Evaluation Mechanisms “Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted.” Albert Einstein Introduction Watershed planning is meant to be an iterative process that provides for continuous input and revision of procedures, processes, and products. This Watershed Management Plan (WMP) is a living document and is meant to be used, revised, and altered to fit the changing needs of the watershed as new information becomes available. This section establishes an overall program framework which emphasizes the importance of an on-going iterative process that consists of three elements: Program Planning, Program Implementation, and Effectiveness Assessment. The relationship between the three elements is presented in Figure 9-1. Portions of this chapter are based on “A Framework for Assessing the Effectiveness of Jurisdictional Urban Runoff Management Programs” developed by the San Diego Municipal Storm Water Co-Permittees (2003). The evaluation mechanisms for each action item are provided in Section 8. The purpose of this section is to explain the different evaluation mechanisms and how they fit into the permit requirements. Figure 9-1 Program Elements MDEQ-Required Components of the WMP 1. Assess the nature and status of the watershed ecosystem. (Sections 3 & 4) 2. Define long-term goals and short-term objectives for the system. (Section 6) 3. Determine actions needed to achieve long-term goals and short-term objectives. (Section 8) 4. Assess both benefits and costs of each action. (Sections 8 & 9) 5. Implement desired actions and permittee commitments by a specified schedule. 6. Evaluate the effects of the implemented actions and the progress toward goals and objectives. 7. Re-evaluate goals and objectives as part of an ongoing, iterative process. Source: MDEQ, 1997. Permit Requirements Watershed management is intended to be a tool in a comprehensive and systematic approach to balancing land uses and human activities to meet mutually agreed upon social, economic, and environmental goals and objectives in a watershed. As required by the NPDES Wastewater Discharge General Permit, the WMP must include the components listed in the adjacent dialog box, all of which are intended to be done in the context of significant public participation (Section 5). The permit does not require any water quality monitoring per se, however evaluating the efforts of the implemented actions is required. Section 9: Evaluation Mechanisms 9-1
Program Planning The program planning phase requires a significant amount of public participation to characterize the watershed and develop and prioritize goals and objectives for the watershed. This phase can be broken down into the four steps below: 1. Goal and Objective Development 2. Action Development 3. Measures of Success 4. Assessment While the elements of program planning interact in a cyclical manner, developing goals and objectives typically initiates the cycle. However, program planning also occurs following the effectiveness assessment phase if changes to the WMP are necessary. Goal and Objective Development The watershed committee has worked with the stakeholders and the public to obtain input and comments during the initial watershed planning process. A facilitated workshop was held to develop and rank goals and objectives. Discussions at watershed committee meetings and stakeholder workshops helped to prioritize long-term watershed goals and objectives that would impact water quality within the watershed. Every effort was made to involve the public during the development process in order to gain support for implementation. The public participation efforts are documented in Section 5. The finalized goals and objectives are presented in Section 6. Action Plan Development To implement the goals and objectives, specific actions were developed for each objective. Action plan development was completed as part of this WMP and is presented in detail in Section 8. The actions were assigned a schedule, responsible party, cost, and means to measure success (refer to the following paragraph, ‘Evaluation Mechanisms’). Evaluation Mechanisms Evaluation mechanisms are essential to gauge implementation status and assess the effectiveness of the overall program. Identification of quantifiable measures provides both measurability and accountability within the program. Six success levels have been established, as shown in Figure 9-2, to provide an organizing framework for the evaluation mechanisms. These success levels are discussed further in the dialog box on the right-hand-side of the page. Note that measures may be classified in more than one level. 9-2 GLRC Watersheds April 2007
Page 2 and 3:
GLRC on Phase II Looking Glass Rive
Page 4 and 5:
P:\1666001\09 Looking Glass WMP\WMP
Page 6 and 7:
Table of Contents Organization of t
Page 8 and 9:
SECTION 10 - Plan Sustainability In
Page 10 and 11:
FIGURES Figure 1-1 Watershed Locati
Page 12 and 13:
Organization of the Plan This plan
Page 14 and 15:
9. Evaluation and Revision Section
Page 16 and 17:
! ! ! ! ! ! Forest Hill ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 18 and 19:
The goals and objectives were then
Page 20 and 21:
Looking Glass Watershed The Looking
Page 22 and 23:
• methods for evaluation of progr
Page 24 and 25:
References Center for Watershed Pro
Page 26 and 27:
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 28 and 29:
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 30 and 31:
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 32 and 33:
The majority of wetlands in the wat
Page 34 and 35:
commonly classified as hydrologic s
Page 36 and 37:
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 38 and 39:
Significant Natural Features to be
Page 40 and 41:
References Centers for Disease Cont
Page 42 and 43:
3. Water Quality Conditions People
Page 44 and 45:
sanitary sewer treatment system has
Page 46 and 47:
Section 3: Water Quality Conditions
Page 48 and 49:
Data Analysis Tetra Tech summarized
Page 50 and 51:
! ! ! ! ! ! Forest Hill ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 52 and 53:
! ! ! ! ! ! Forest Hill ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 54 and 55:
Table 3-4 explains the problems fou
Page 56 and 57:
Vermillion Creek Assessment Vermill
Page 58 and 59:
Volunteers identify the species bas
Page 60 and 61:
Watershed Fish Consumption The Mich
Page 62 and 63:
The coldwater fishery use does not
Page 64 and 65:
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 66 and 67:
Interpretation of Watershed Conditi
Page 68 and 69:
4. Community Outreach A watershed p
Page 70 and 71:
Public Comment on Draft Plan A draf
Page 72 and 73: Public Education Plan Public educat
Page 74 and 75: determining goals and desires for t
Page 76 and 77: Table 5-1 Status of Designated Uses
Page 78 and 79: Sources The main sources of sedimen
Page 80 and 81: the time for the specified month. (
Page 82 and 83: Altered Hydrology Stream flows vary
Page 84 and 85: day as it is at a USGS gauging stat
Page 86 and 87: Figure 5-2 R-B Index at Eagle (USGS
Page 88 and 89: It should also be noted that the su
Page 90 and 91: Detergents are becoming a serious t
Page 92 and 93: Physical Pollutants Physical pollut
Page 94 and 95: Oil and grease are often referred t
Page 96 and 97: Table 5-14 Pesticide: Sources and C
Page 98 and 99: Introduction 6. Goals and Objective
Page 100 and 101: equirements, some objectives go bey
Page 102 and 103: Goal 3: Encourage Water Quality Fri
Page 104 and 105: general health of wetlands, primary
Page 106 and 107: References DAS Manufacturing. “Cu
Page 108 and 109: Several programs are available loca
Page 110 and 111: Better Site Design Better site desi
Page 112 and 113: Non-Storm Water Discharges Non-stor
Page 114 and 115: producers to meet personal objectiv
Page 116 and 117: Michigan Turfgrass Environmental St
Page 118 and 119: 8. Action Plan Source: Basetree, 20
Page 120 and 121: Table 8-1 Benefits of Goals No Goal
Page 124 and 125: Evaluation Mechanisms Level One - A
Page 126 and 127: Program Implementation Program impl
Page 128 and 129: The MDEQ/MDNR have conducted analyt
Page 130 and 131: Assessing the evaluation mechanisms
Page 132 and 133: Goal 3: Encourage Water Quality Fri
Page 134 and 135: Goal 6: Protect and Increase Wetlan
Page 136 and 137: Evaluation Action Plan At the end o
Page 138 and 139: Evaluation Mechanisms Municipal Sta
Page 140 and 141: The committee defined appropriate w
Page 142 and 143: “It is the purpose of this Memora
Page 144 and 145: each other about how to protect and
Page 146 and 147: A-2 Looking Glass River Watershed A
Page 148 and 149: B-2 Looking Glass River Watershed A
Page 150 and 151: C-2 Looking Glass River Watershed A
Page 152 and 153: D-2 Looking Glass River Watershed A
Page 154 and 155: Appendix E Road Stream Surveys Appe
Page 156 and 157: Appendix F Vermillion Creek Corresp
show all

Looking Glass River Watershed Management Plan - Greater ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?