Looking Glass River Watershed Management Plan - Greater ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Evaluation Mechanisms Level One – Activities conducted include those that are described or required in the permit. These activities are expected to be beneficial to water quality because they are part of a successful WMP. This plan addresses the permit requirements including specific requirements of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Initiative (SWPPI). Level Two – Changes in knowledge and awareness are targeted through the Public Participation Plan (PPP) and Public Education Plan (PEP), such as conducting stakeholder workshops and public briefings. Level Three – The desired success of Level Three is behavioral change due to an increase in knowledge. This may be documented through the use of a survey or tracking the number of Best Management Practices (BMPs) installed or retrofitted. Section 7 discusses possible tools for watershed protection such as watershed planning, land conservation, and soil erosion and sediment control. Level Four – BMPs are used to reduce the amount of pollutants entering local water bodies from storm water runoff. Load reductions may be calculated based on information provided once a BMP is installed. Load reductions may also be estimated for illicit discharges that are removed. Level Five – Changes in the water quality of storm water discharge show the direct environmental benefit gained by the installation of BMPs and pollution prevention practices. Permittees will be working on this task through their Illicit Discharge Elimination Program (IDEP), which seeks to correct illicit discharges that are discovered through outfall screening and investigation. Should a sample show poor water quality, further sampling and testing will take place to pinpoint the source and work to remove it. Level Six - The ultimate goal of the permit program is to improve the water quality of receiving water bodies. Monitoring may be conducted on a periodic basis to show change in water quality and environmental benefit. More details concerning monitoring efforts are included in the discussion on effectiveness assessments. Figure 9-2. Success Levels. Each measure can also be classified based on the data required for an appropriate assessment. There are three data classifications, including: • Measure of Activity Completion – requires only an indication of whether or not an activity has been completed (i.e. “Complete” or “Incomplete”). These measures are used to assess implementation. • Measure of Usage – requires data concerning how much a facility has been used or how much of a material has been distributed or collected (i.e. “200 brochures distributed”). These measures are used to assess implementation. • Measure of Change – requires data concerning baseline and postaction levels of knowledge or water quality (i.e. “a comparison of baseline and post-action results for macroinvertebrate monitoring in the river show signs of improvement”). These measures are used to assess effectiveness. Table 9-1 gives examples of evaluation mechanisms from the action plan table based on the six different success levels. Note that actions must have at least one measurable in any data classification category and may have one in each category. One other distinction that can be made to classify the evaluation mechanisms is whether they are direct or indirect. Direct evaluation mechanisms are associated with characterizing water quality and quantifying pollutant loads. Indirect evaluation mechanisms deal with degrees of activity or program implementation. Section 9: Evaluation Mechanisms 9-3
Level One Two Three Four Five Table 9-1. Examples of Evaluation Mechanisms by Type. Measure of Activity Example Objective / Action Completion Objective 7d: Provide maintenance activities and inspection procedures for A manual has been permanent structural storm water BMPs. adopted. Action 3: Adopt BMP Manual. Objective 1b: Assist local school districts in developing a science curriculum on watershed studies. Action 3: Work with schools to see that this is implemented and that a standard assessment or test is conducted following the presentation of the curriculum. Objective 1h: Conduct ‘Public Watershed Awareness Assessment’. Action 3: Mail assessments and compile results. Objective 7f: Reduce discharge of pollutants from streets, roads, highways, parking lots, and maintenance garages. Action 4: Develop method to track quantity of sediment and debris removed Objective 8b: Conduct an illicit discharge removal program including: finding problems by checking for leaking sanitary systems, leaking septic systems, and illicit connections; removing the source of the problem and prohibiting their reoccurrence through municipal code and ordinances Communication / meetings between the community and the schools have occurred. Assessments have been mailed. A method to track quantity of debris removed from system has been developed. Septic system tracking program has been implemented Measure of Usage Number of local agencies and municipalities that adopt the manual. • Number of teachers presenting material. • Number of students the curriculum reaches. Number of assessments returned. Quantity of debris removed from streets and catch basins annually. Willingness of County Health Departments to use tracking system Measure of Change Evaluate changes in water quality based on ongoing monitoring results. Evaluate changes in awareness through student assessment or test. Results of assessment to measure knowledge and behavior change. Evaluate changes in water quality based on on-going monitoring results. Evaluate changes in water quality based on ongoing monitoring results. Six Action 3: Implement septic system tracking program in the Tri-County Area Evaluate changes in water quality based on ongoing monitoring results. See Table 9-2 for details concerning water quality monitoring within the watershed. Assessment Assessment is the process of evaluating the Evaluation Mechanisms. The following describes how each of the three types of evaluation mechanisms is assessed. • Measure of Activity Completion - A ‘yes’ or ‘no’ is required to evaluate the measure. • Measure of Usage - The actual usage amount is required to evaluate the measure. • Measure of Change - The actual change in water quality or public behavior is required to evaluate the measure. 9-4 GLRC Watersheds April 2007
Page 2 and 3:
GLRC on Phase II Looking Glass Rive
Page 4 and 5:
P:\1666001\09 Looking Glass WMP\WMP
Page 6 and 7:
Table of Contents Organization of t
Page 8 and 9:
SECTION 10 - Plan Sustainability In
Page 10 and 11:
FIGURES Figure 1-1 Watershed Locati
Page 12 and 13:
Organization of the Plan This plan
Page 14 and 15:
9. Evaluation and Revision Section
Page 16 and 17:
! ! ! ! ! ! Forest Hill ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 18 and 19:
The goals and objectives were then
Page 20 and 21:
Looking Glass Watershed The Looking
Page 22 and 23:
• methods for evaluation of progr
Page 24 and 25:
References Center for Watershed Pro
Page 26 and 27:
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 28 and 29:
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 30 and 31:
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 32 and 33:
The majority of wetlands in the wat
Page 34 and 35:
commonly classified as hydrologic s
Page 36 and 37:
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 38 and 39:
Significant Natural Features to be
Page 40 and 41:
References Centers for Disease Cont
Page 42 and 43:
3. Water Quality Conditions People
Page 44 and 45:
sanitary sewer treatment system has
Page 46 and 47:
Section 3: Water Quality Conditions
Page 48 and 49:
Data Analysis Tetra Tech summarized
Page 50 and 51:
! ! ! ! ! ! Forest Hill ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 52 and 53:
! ! ! ! ! ! Forest Hill ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 54 and 55:
Table 3-4 explains the problems fou
Page 56 and 57:
Vermillion Creek Assessment Vermill
Page 58 and 59:
Volunteers identify the species bas
Page 60 and 61:
Watershed Fish Consumption The Mich
Page 62 and 63:
The coldwater fishery use does not
Page 64 and 65:
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 66 and 67:
Interpretation of Watershed Conditi
Page 68 and 69:
4. Community Outreach A watershed p
Page 70 and 71:
Public Comment on Draft Plan A draf
Page 72 and 73:
Public Education Plan Public educat
Page 74 and 75: determining goals and desires for t
Page 76 and 77: Table 5-1 Status of Designated Uses
Page 78 and 79: Sources The main sources of sedimen
Page 80 and 81: the time for the specified month. (
Page 82 and 83: Altered Hydrology Stream flows vary
Page 84 and 85: day as it is at a USGS gauging stat
Page 86 and 87: Figure 5-2 R-B Index at Eagle (USGS
Page 88 and 89: It should also be noted that the su
Page 90 and 91: Detergents are becoming a serious t
Page 92 and 93: Physical Pollutants Physical pollut
Page 94 and 95: Oil and grease are often referred t
Page 96 and 97: Table 5-14 Pesticide: Sources and C
Page 98 and 99: Introduction 6. Goals and Objective
Page 100 and 101: equirements, some objectives go bey
Page 102 and 103: Goal 3: Encourage Water Quality Fri
Page 104 and 105: general health of wetlands, primary
Page 106 and 107: References DAS Manufacturing. “Cu
Page 108 and 109: Several programs are available loca
Page 110 and 111: Better Site Design Better site desi
Page 112 and 113: Non-Storm Water Discharges Non-stor
Page 114 and 115: producers to meet personal objectiv
Page 116 and 117: Michigan Turfgrass Environmental St
Page 118 and 119: 8. Action Plan Source: Basetree, 20
Page 120 and 121: Table 8-1 Benefits of Goals No Goal
Page 122 and 123: 9. Evaluation Mechanisms “Not eve
Page 126 and 127: Program Implementation Program impl
Page 128 and 129: The MDEQ/MDNR have conducted analyt
Page 130 and 131: Assessing the evaluation mechanisms
Page 132 and 133: Goal 3: Encourage Water Quality Fri
Page 134 and 135: Goal 6: Protect and Increase Wetlan
Page 136 and 137: Evaluation Action Plan At the end o
Page 138 and 139: Evaluation Mechanisms Municipal Sta
Page 140 and 141: The committee defined appropriate w
Page 142 and 143: “It is the purpose of this Memora
Page 144 and 145: each other about how to protect and
Page 146 and 147: A-2 Looking Glass River Watershed A
Page 148 and 149: B-2 Looking Glass River Watershed A
Page 150 and 151: C-2 Looking Glass River Watershed A
Page 152 and 153: D-2 Looking Glass River Watershed A
Page 154 and 155: Appendix E Road Stream Surveys Appe
Page 156 and 157: Appendix F Vermillion Creek Corresp
show all

Looking Glass River Watershed Management Plan - Greater ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?