Looking Glass River Watershed Management Plan - Greater ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 5-14 Pesticide: Sources and Causes Sources Agricultural Lands Residential Gardens Drainage Ditches/Retention Basins Golf Courses Mosquito Treatment Lake Management Cause Pesticide Application Lack of Buffer Pesticide Application Lack of Buffer Pesticide Application to Reduce Maintenance Pesticide Application Lack of Buffer Pesticide Application Lack of Buffer Pesticide Application Lack of Buffer Thermal Pollutants Thermal pollution is waste heat generated from industrial processes which use water for cooling. The water is returned back into the water system at a significantly higher temperature, decreasing the dissolved oxygen and increasing the biological demand for oxygen from organisms. Changes in temperature, even slight changes, will cause stress to urban streams and aquatic life. Specifically, increases in temperature result in changes in migration patterns, increased sensitivity and mortality in fish, and an increase in metabolic activity producing greater disease and parasite susceptibility (CWP, March 2003). Table 5-15 Temperature: Sources and Causes Photo Courtesy of Tetra Tech, 2005. Sources Urban Runoff Lack of Riparian Buffer Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTWs) and Industrial Discharges Cause Impervious Surfaces Lack of Shade over Drainage and Storage Facilities Lack of Shade over Watercourse Plant Effluent Limits Poor Design Poor Maintenance Other Potential Problems While woody debris is not technically a pollutant, large amounts of it hinder recreation such as canoeing in rivers and streams and may indicate bank erosion problems. Woody debris can also increase the flood stage and increase flooding on private property. However, woody debris is generally beneficial to the environment since it provides habitat for fish and macroinvertebrates which is critical for maintaining a healthy fishery. Table 5-16 Woody Debris: Sources and Causes Sources Dead Fall Yard Waste Dumping Wildlife Habitat Cause Natural Causes Flow Fluctuations (see Altered Hydrology) Clearing by Property Owners (view of river) Lack of Convenient Disposal Facilities Natural Causes Photo Courtesy of Tetra Tech, 2005. 5-22 Looking Glass River Watershed April 2007
References Baker, D., R. Richards, T. Loftus, and J. Kramer. “A New Flashiness Index: Characteristics and Applications to Midwestern Rivers and Streams.” Journal of the American Water Resources Association, April 2004. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2001. Protocol for Developing Pathogen TMDLs, First Edition. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington D.C. Leopold, Luna B. “A View of the River.” Harvard University Press. 1994 Michigan Department of Environmental Quality. “Hydrologic Impacts Due to Development: The Need for Adequate Runoff and Stream protection” May 2002. Schueler, 1994. 1994. The Importance of Imperviousness. Watershed Protection Techniques 1:100-111. Waters, T.F. “Sediment in Streams: Sources, Biological Effects, and Control.” American Fisheries Society Monograph 7. 1995. Section 5: Stressor Summary 5-23
Page 2 and 3:
GLRC on Phase II Looking Glass Rive
Page 4 and 5:
P:\1666001\09 Looking Glass WMP\WMP
Page 6 and 7:
Table of Contents Organization of t
Page 8 and 9:
SECTION 10 - Plan Sustainability In
Page 10 and 11:
FIGURES Figure 1-1 Watershed Locati
Page 12 and 13:
Organization of the Plan This plan
Page 14 and 15:
9. Evaluation and Revision Section
Page 16 and 17:
! ! ! ! ! ! Forest Hill ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 18 and 19:
The goals and objectives were then
Page 20 and 21:
Looking Glass Watershed The Looking
Page 22 and 23:
• methods for evaluation of progr
Page 24 and 25:
References Center for Watershed Pro
Page 26 and 27:
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 28 and 29:
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 30 and 31:
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 32 and 33:
The majority of wetlands in the wat
Page 34 and 35:
commonly classified as hydrologic s
Page 36 and 37:
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 38 and 39:
Significant Natural Features to be
Page 40 and 41:
References Centers for Disease Cont
Page 42 and 43:
3. Water Quality Conditions People
Page 44 and 45:
sanitary sewer treatment system has
Page 46 and 47: Section 3: Water Quality Conditions
Page 48 and 49: Data Analysis Tetra Tech summarized
Page 50 and 51: ! ! ! ! ! ! Forest Hill ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 52 and 53: ! ! ! ! ! ! Forest Hill ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 54 and 55: Table 3-4 explains the problems fou
Page 56 and 57: Vermillion Creek Assessment Vermill
Page 58 and 59: Volunteers identify the species bas
Page 60 and 61: Watershed Fish Consumption The Mich
Page 62 and 63: The coldwater fishery use does not
Page 64 and 65: ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 66 and 67: Interpretation of Watershed Conditi
Page 68 and 69: 4. Community Outreach A watershed p
Page 70 and 71: Public Comment on Draft Plan A draf
Page 72 and 73: Public Education Plan Public educat
Page 74 and 75: determining goals and desires for t
Page 76 and 77: Table 5-1 Status of Designated Uses
Page 78 and 79: Sources The main sources of sedimen
Page 80 and 81: the time for the specified month. (
Page 82 and 83: Altered Hydrology Stream flows vary
Page 84 and 85: day as it is at a USGS gauging stat
Page 86 and 87: Figure 5-2 R-B Index at Eagle (USGS
Page 88 and 89: It should also be noted that the su
Page 90 and 91: Detergents are becoming a serious t
Page 92 and 93: Physical Pollutants Physical pollut
Page 94 and 95: Oil and grease are often referred t
Page 98 and 99: Introduction 6. Goals and Objective
Page 100 and 101: equirements, some objectives go bey
Page 102 and 103: Goal 3: Encourage Water Quality Fri
Page 104 and 105: general health of wetlands, primary
Page 106 and 107: References DAS Manufacturing. “Cu
Page 108 and 109: Several programs are available loca
Page 110 and 111: Better Site Design Better site desi
Page 112 and 113: Non-Storm Water Discharges Non-stor
Page 114 and 115: producers to meet personal objectiv
Page 116 and 117: Michigan Turfgrass Environmental St
Page 118 and 119: 8. Action Plan Source: Basetree, 20
Page 120 and 121: Table 8-1 Benefits of Goals No Goal
Page 122 and 123: 9. Evaluation Mechanisms “Not eve
Page 124 and 125: Evaluation Mechanisms Level One - A
Page 126 and 127: Program Implementation Program impl
Page 128 and 129: The MDEQ/MDNR have conducted analyt
Page 130 and 131: Assessing the evaluation mechanisms
Page 132 and 133: Goal 3: Encourage Water Quality Fri
Page 134 and 135: Goal 6: Protect and Increase Wetlan
Page 136 and 137: Evaluation Action Plan At the end o
Page 138 and 139: Evaluation Mechanisms Municipal Sta
Page 140 and 141: The committee defined appropriate w
Page 142 and 143: “It is the purpose of this Memora
Page 144 and 145: each other about how to protect and
Page 146 and 147:
A-2 Looking Glass River Watershed A
Page 148 and 149:
B-2 Looking Glass River Watershed A
Page 150 and 151:
C-2 Looking Glass River Watershed A
Page 152 and 153:
D-2 Looking Glass River Watershed A
Page 154 and 155:
Appendix E Road Stream Surveys Appe
Page 156 and 157:
Appendix F Vermillion Creek Corresp
show all

Looking Glass River Watershed Management Plan - Greater ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?