Looking Glass River Watershed Management Plan - Greater ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

The committee defined appropriate watershed boundaries for the Grand River Watershed, the Red Cedar River Watershed, and the Looking Glass River Watershed. On January 25, 2002, the Committee agreed to retain Tetra Tech to prepare WMPs for these watersheds. Again, the allocation of cost was based on the previously agreed upon formula. Each community adopted a third resolution committing their appropriate funds for the watershed management plans. A Public Education Advisory Committee was organized to assist in the educational portion of the Voluntary General Permit Applications, including in this an inventory of current community practices. Throughout 2002 and 2003, fourteen additional communities within the three watersheds were invited to join the committee. Ten of these communities were required to meet the Stormwater Phase II requirements based on the 2000 census. Eight communities ultimately joined and participated in the regional approach and completed the Voluntary General Permit Application. In March 2003, all seventeen communities; (the original nine plus the eight additional communities); and the three counties submitted their Voluntary General Permit Applications to MDEQ. In November 2003, certificates of coverage were issued to each of the seventeen communities and to each of the three counties. Figure 10-1 Greater Lansing Regional Committee Structure Greater Lansing Regional Committee (GLRC) Additional Committee Members (as of 2004) Alaiedon, Township of DeWitt, City of Dimondale, Village of Grand Ledge, City of Mason, City of Oneida, Township of Vevay, Township of Watertown, Township of Windsor, Township of Tri-County Regional Planning Commission GLRC Executive Committee GLRC Coordinator Grand River Watershed Committee Public Education Plan Funding Red Cedar River Watershed Illicit Discharge Elimination Plan Habitat and Recreation Looking Glass River Watershed • Ordinance • Development Standards • Best Management Practices In early 2004, Alaeidon Township joined the committee and submitted its permit application in November. Throughout 2004, the communities involved in the voluntary committee adopted a ‘Memorandum of Agreement’ (GLRC, 2004) to establish the “Greater Lansing Regional Committee on Phase II Nonpoint Source 10-2 Looking Glass River Watershed April 2007
Pollution Prevention” (GLRC). The committee was formally convened on May 21, 2004. This committee structure is outlined in the flowchart on the right (Figure 10-1) and is discussed under the “Phase II Legal Relationship” heading below. Watershed Committees Although each individual community is ultimately responsible for fulfilling permit requirements, actual implementation of the WMP will be predominately by committee, particularly during the initial stages of the WMP. For many of the proposed objectives in the action plan, the first action in support of the objective is to create a committee. Committees will be assigned a chairperson who will then solicit members from the watershed committee, municipal staff, stakeholders, the general public, or any other individual pertinent to the decision-making process. Depending on the nature of the task they are appointed to oversee, committees may have a short or long lifespan. It is anticipated that each committee will make decisions and represent the wishes to the full watershed committee. Existing committees that were created as part of the WMP development process will also be utilized during WMP implementation. The individual make-up of these committees will be reevaluated for applicability to the new assignments. Volunteers who identified interest during a Stakeholder Workshop are also included in these committees. Existing committees include the following: Illicit Discharge Elimination Plan (IDEP) Committee – Illicit connection and septic system ordinances and enforcement. Public Education Plan (PEP) Committee – Public education materials and outreach strategies. Ordinance and Best Management Practice Committee – Ordinances related to IDEP, development standards, and operation and maintenance. – Water quality friendly site development standards planning practices. – Structural storm water BMPs, ditch/drain BMPs, and stream recreation. The following committees will be created as part of WMP implementation. The members indicated have volunteered to participate. Funding Committee - Funding strategy for WMP implementation. Habitat and Recreation Committee - Studies and research explicit to the health of local streams and habitat. - Wetland inventory, protection, and restoration. Phase II Legal Relationship As previously mentioned, the communities formed the GLRC in 2004 by adopting a ‘Memorandum of Agreement’. The stated purpose of this agreement is as follows (GLRC, 2004): Section 10: Plan Sustainability 10-3
Page 2 and 3:
GLRC on Phase II Looking Glass Rive
Page 4 and 5:
P:\1666001\09 Looking Glass WMP\WMP
Page 6 and 7:
Table of Contents Organization of t
Page 8 and 9:
SECTION 10 - Plan Sustainability In
Page 10 and 11:
FIGURES Figure 1-1 Watershed Locati
Page 12 and 13:
Organization of the Plan This plan
Page 14 and 15:
9. Evaluation and Revision Section
Page 16 and 17:
! ! ! ! ! ! Forest Hill ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 18 and 19:
The goals and objectives were then
Page 20 and 21:
Looking Glass Watershed The Looking
Page 22 and 23:
• methods for evaluation of progr
Page 24 and 25:
References Center for Watershed Pro
Page 26 and 27:
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 28 and 29:
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 30 and 31:
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 32 and 33:
The majority of wetlands in the wat
Page 34 and 35:
commonly classified as hydrologic s
Page 36 and 37:
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 38 and 39:
Significant Natural Features to be
Page 40 and 41:
References Centers for Disease Cont
Page 42 and 43:
3. Water Quality Conditions People
Page 44 and 45:
sanitary sewer treatment system has
Page 46 and 47:
Section 3: Water Quality Conditions
Page 48 and 49:
Data Analysis Tetra Tech summarized
Page 50 and 51:
! ! ! ! ! ! Forest Hill ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 52 and 53:
! ! ! ! ! ! Forest Hill ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 54 and 55:
Table 3-4 explains the problems fou
Page 56 and 57:
Vermillion Creek Assessment Vermill
Page 58 and 59:
Volunteers identify the species bas
Page 60 and 61:
Watershed Fish Consumption The Mich
Page 62 and 63:
The coldwater fishery use does not
Page 64 and 65:
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 66 and 67:
Interpretation of Watershed Conditi
Page 68 and 69:
4. Community Outreach A watershed p
Page 70 and 71:
Public Comment on Draft Plan A draf
Page 72 and 73:
Public Education Plan Public educat
Page 74 and 75:
determining goals and desires for t
Page 76 and 77:
Table 5-1 Status of Designated Uses
Page 78 and 79:
Sources The main sources of sedimen
Page 80 and 81:
the time for the specified month. (
Page 82 and 83:
Altered Hydrology Stream flows vary
Page 84 and 85:
day as it is at a USGS gauging stat
Page 86 and 87:
Figure 5-2 R-B Index at Eagle (USGS
Page 88 and 89:
It should also be noted that the su
Page 90 and 91: Detergents are becoming a serious t
Page 92 and 93: Physical Pollutants Physical pollut
Page 94 and 95: Oil and grease are often referred t
Page 96 and 97: Table 5-14 Pesticide: Sources and C
Page 98 and 99: Introduction 6. Goals and Objective
Page 100 and 101: equirements, some objectives go bey
Page 102 and 103: Goal 3: Encourage Water Quality Fri
Page 104 and 105: general health of wetlands, primary
Page 106 and 107: References DAS Manufacturing. “Cu
Page 108 and 109: Several programs are available loca
Page 110 and 111: Better Site Design Better site desi
Page 112 and 113: Non-Storm Water Discharges Non-stor
Page 114 and 115: producers to meet personal objectiv
Page 116 and 117: Michigan Turfgrass Environmental St
Page 118 and 119: 8. Action Plan Source: Basetree, 20
Page 120 and 121: Table 8-1 Benefits of Goals No Goal
Page 122 and 123: 9. Evaluation Mechanisms “Not eve
Page 124 and 125: Evaluation Mechanisms Level One - A
Page 126 and 127: Program Implementation Program impl
Page 128 and 129: The MDEQ/MDNR have conducted analyt
Page 130 and 131: Assessing the evaluation mechanisms
Page 132 and 133: Goal 3: Encourage Water Quality Fri
Page 134 and 135: Goal 6: Protect and Increase Wetlan
Page 136 and 137: Evaluation Action Plan At the end o
Page 138 and 139: Evaluation Mechanisms Municipal Sta
Page 142 and 143: “It is the purpose of this Memora
Page 144 and 145: each other about how to protect and
Page 146 and 147: A-2 Looking Glass River Watershed A
Page 148 and 149: B-2 Looking Glass River Watershed A
Page 150 and 151: C-2 Looking Glass River Watershed A
Page 152 and 153: D-2 Looking Glass River Watershed A
Page 154 and 155: Appendix E Road Stream Surveys Appe
Page 156 and 157: Appendix F Vermillion Creek Corresp
show all

Looking Glass River Watershed Management Plan - Greater ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?