Looking Glass River Watershed Management Plan - Greater ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Vermillion Creek Assessment Vermillion Creek is a tributary to the Looking Glass River and is located on the east side of the urbanized area watershed. A portion of the creek is listed as impaired due to untreated sewage discharged/pathogens and is scheduled for development of a TMDL in 2009 (MDEQ 2006). The source of the concern is located upstream of the watershed for which this plan is written. The concern stems from an observation made by MDEQ staff that a residential property located on the southeast corner of the Beardslee Road and Braden Road intersection was observed discharging an unpermitted septic tank drainage (Scott 1993). The Shiawassee County Health Department was contacted in January 2007 to determine the current status of this problem. After researching the issue, the Health Department indicated that a new septic system was constructed in 1993 at the location in question, presumably due to the observation, and a point of sale inspection was conducted in 2006 which revealed that the system is intact and functioning (refer to Appendix F for copies of the correspondence). Since the only indication of a pathogen problem was the 1993 observation (Scott 1993) and the Shiawassee County Health Department has confirmed that this particular problem no longer exists, the assumption is that Vermillion Creek should no longer be listed as impaired for untreated sewage discharged/pathogens. Britton Woodbury Pulver Perry No 2 Drain Bath Osborn Creek Drain Woodbury §¨¦I 69 Woodhull Twp Beard Perry Beardslee Vermilion Creek M 52 Dunn Braden Warner Oakes Shaftsburg Vermilion Creek . Section 3: Water Quality Conditions 3-15
Mid-Michigan Environmental Action Council Mid-Michigan Environmental Action Council (Mid-MEAC) is a non-profit and volunteer based environmental organization dedicated to improving the environment and quality of life by raising environmental consciousness and activism. Data collection was provided in the Michigan Clean Water Corps grant application, which required testing of each site and includes past monitoring data. Monitoring sites are located in Table 3-6 and Figure 3-1. Table 3-6 Mid-MEAC Monitoring Data River Name Looking Glass River Looking Glass River Vermillion Creek Road Location DeWitt Road in downtown DeWitt Airport Road, off Herbison Road Rose Lake State Game Area County Clinton County Clinton County Clinton County Macro Rating Location Assessment Surrounding Areas Reason to Monitor Fair Slight bank & shoreline forest, Serves as an erosion/modification/destruction, residential upstream some urban runoff, & lawns & location to residential/tourism activities parks be compared to a state location downstream from the Southern Clinton County Municipal Utilities Authority (SCCMUA) Fair None Conducted forest Located downstream from the Waste Water Treatment Plant. No Results None Conducted low gradient, wetland type of stream MDEQ received some information in the late 1990’s indicating high E. coli counts the in stream. Year 2004 2004 2004 Frog and Toad Survey Michigan is home to 13 native species of anurans (frogs and toads). In recent years, observers have noticed a decline in population of several anuran species in Michigan. Frogs and toads are sensitive to changes in water quality and urbanization. Therefore, their populations serve as an index to environmental quality. The State of Michigan is concerned about the decline of anurans. Michigan initiated a volunteer based frog and toad survey program in 1988 to increase the knowledge of anuran distribution and to monitor population over the long-term. Wetland sites are visited in early spring, late spring and summer for monitoring. Wood Frog 3-16 Looking Glass River Watershed April 2007
Page 2 and 3:
GLRC on Phase II Looking Glass Rive
Page 4 and 5:
P:\1666001\09 Looking Glass WMP\WMP
Page 6 and 7: Table of Contents Organization of t
Page 8 and 9: SECTION 10 - Plan Sustainability In
Page 10 and 11: FIGURES Figure 1-1 Watershed Locati
Page 12 and 13: Organization of the Plan This plan
Page 14 and 15: 9. Evaluation and Revision Section
Page 16 and 17: ! ! ! ! ! ! Forest Hill ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 18 and 19: The goals and objectives were then
Page 20 and 21: Looking Glass Watershed The Looking
Page 22 and 23: • methods for evaluation of progr
Page 24 and 25: References Center for Watershed Pro
Page 26 and 27: ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 28 and 29: ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 30 and 31: ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 32 and 33: The majority of wetlands in the wat
Page 34 and 35: commonly classified as hydrologic s
Page 36 and 37: ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 38 and 39: Significant Natural Features to be
Page 40 and 41: References Centers for Disease Cont
Page 42 and 43: 3. Water Quality Conditions People
Page 44 and 45: sanitary sewer treatment system has
Page 46 and 47: Section 3: Water Quality Conditions
Page 48 and 49: Data Analysis Tetra Tech summarized
Page 54 and 55: Table 3-4 explains the problems fou
Page 58 and 59: Volunteers identify the species bas
Page 60 and 61: Watershed Fish Consumption The Mich
Page 62 and 63: The coldwater fishery use does not
Page 64 and 65: ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 66 and 67: Interpretation of Watershed Conditi
Page 68 and 69: 4. Community Outreach A watershed p
Page 70 and 71: Public Comment on Draft Plan A draf
Page 72 and 73: Public Education Plan Public educat
Page 74 and 75: determining goals and desires for t
Page 76 and 77: Table 5-1 Status of Designated Uses
Page 78 and 79: Sources The main sources of sedimen
Page 80 and 81: the time for the specified month. (
Page 82 and 83: Altered Hydrology Stream flows vary
Page 84 and 85: day as it is at a USGS gauging stat
Page 86 and 87: Figure 5-2 R-B Index at Eagle (USGS
Page 88 and 89: It should also be noted that the su
Page 90 and 91: Detergents are becoming a serious t
Page 92 and 93: Physical Pollutants Physical pollut
Page 94 and 95: Oil and grease are often referred t
Page 96 and 97: Table 5-14 Pesticide: Sources and C
Page 98 and 99: Introduction 6. Goals and Objective
Page 100 and 101: equirements, some objectives go bey
Page 102 and 103: Goal 3: Encourage Water Quality Fri
Page 104 and 105: general health of wetlands, primary
Page 106 and 107:
References DAS Manufacturing. “Cu
Page 108 and 109:
Several programs are available loca
Page 110 and 111:
Better Site Design Better site desi
Page 112 and 113:
Non-Storm Water Discharges Non-stor
Page 114 and 115:
producers to meet personal objectiv
Page 116 and 117:
Michigan Turfgrass Environmental St
Page 118 and 119:
8. Action Plan Source: Basetree, 20
Page 120 and 121:
Table 8-1 Benefits of Goals No Goal
Page 122 and 123:
9. Evaluation Mechanisms “Not eve
Page 124 and 125:
Evaluation Mechanisms Level One - A
Page 126 and 127:
Program Implementation Program impl
Page 128 and 129:
The MDEQ/MDNR have conducted analyt
Page 130 and 131:
Assessing the evaluation mechanisms
Page 132 and 133:
Goal 3: Encourage Water Quality Fri
Page 134 and 135:
Goal 6: Protect and Increase Wetlan
Page 136 and 137:
Evaluation Action Plan At the end o
Page 138 and 139:
Evaluation Mechanisms Municipal Sta
Page 140 and 141:
The committee defined appropriate w
Page 142 and 143:
“It is the purpose of this Memora
Page 144 and 145:
each other about how to protect and
Page 146 and 147:
A-2 Looking Glass River Watershed A
Page 148 and 149:
B-2 Looking Glass River Watershed A
Page 150 and 151:
C-2 Looking Glass River Watershed A
Page 152 and 153:
D-2 Looking Glass River Watershed A
Page 154 and 155:
Appendix E Road Stream Surveys Appe
Page 156 and 157:
Appendix F Vermillion Creek Corresp
show all

Looking Glass River Watershed Management Plan - Greater ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?