Looking Glass River Watershed Management Plan - Greater ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

The MDEQ/MDNR have conducted analytical chemistry testing in the past and may do so again in the future at their discretion. Stream Corridor Assessments During this effort the participants walk reaches of a stream looking for and recording issues potentially impacting the waterbody such as outfalls, bank erosion, buffer, channel modifications, trash and debris, and impacts from utilities. Issues such as substrate, water clarity, plant and wildlife, shade cover can also be noted. Some data collected during the assessments overlaps with data collected using other methods. Stream corridor assessments may be conducted as part of a canoe trip on waterways large enough to support canoeing. River Sampling, Courtesy of Tetra Tech, June 2005. Stream Crossing Watershed Survey with Photograph The stream crossing watershed survey is an approach used to collect information about the quality of a stream. A standard data collection form is used to ensure uniformity throughout the watersheds. The physical habitat of the site, including water characteristics, stream characteristics, plant life, foam and trash presence, substrate type, stream morphology, land use, and corridor description, is recorded. Also potential sources of pollution upstream and downstream of the site are identified if apparent. This method is similar to the stream corridor assessment but is conducted at discrete sites where streams and roads cross as opposed to entire stretches of stream. The MDEQ maintains a statewide database and standard protocol set that can easily be implemented. The MDEQ may provide training upon request. Hot Spot Testing Parts of the watershed encompass land once and currently used for industrial and commercial purposes. Prior to government regulation, a number of pollutants were released without realizing their potential impacts on public health and safety and water quality in aquatic environments. In addition to this historical pollution, various hot spots of pollution may exist due to accidental release or intentional, illegal releases. Any known or discovered hot spots may be monitored for the applicable pollutants. MDEQ Water Quality Monitoring Program (MDEQ, 2005) Environmental monitoring is an essential component of the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality mission. The DEQ recognizes that comprehensive water quality monitoring is necessary to improve natural resource management, maintain sustainable ecosystems, and protect public health. MDEQs strategy is described in a report titled “Michigan Water Quality Monitoring Strategy Update” prepared in April 2005. The Strategy consists of nine interrelate elements: fish contaminants, water chemistry, sediment chemistry, biological integrity, wildlife contaminants, bathing beaches, inland lake quality and eutrophication, stream flow, and volunteer monitoring. The Strategy specifically identifies four monitoring goals: • Assess the current status and condition of waters of the state and determine whether water quality standards are being met; • Measure spatial and temporal water quality trends: • Evaluate the effectiveness of water quality prevention and protection programs; and Section 9: Evaluation Mechanisms 9-7
• Identify new and emerging water quality problems. A number of approaches are employed to meet the diverse objectives of the monitoring program. In general the monitoring activities fall under one or more of the following types of study design: • 5-year Rotating Basin o Biological surveys o Fish Contaminants o Inland Lake Assessment o Special Studies • Fixed Station o Water Chemistry o Wildlife Contaminants (Herring Gull Eggs) o Stream Flow o Volunteer Monitoring (Inland Lakes) o Fish Contaminants • Probabilistic o Wildlife Contaminants (Bald Eagles) o Inland Lake Assessment • Targeted Sites/Special Studies o Water Chemistry o Fish Contaminants o Biological Surveys o Beach Monitoring o Sediment Chemistry o Volunteer Monitoring (Streams) The Upper Grand River Watershed which includes the Red Cedar and Looking Glass Rivers is in Basin Year 5 of the DEQ monitoring program and the next round of studies on this program is expected in 2006. As a part of the evaluation mechanisms, the data collected by the DEQ will be reviewed and evaluated as appropriate for this watershed. Program Assessment Program assessment involves reviewing the attainment of the evaluation mechanisms. Evaluation mechanisms will be reviewed for implementation and effectiveness and if not implemented or effective, an investigation will be conducted to determine possible factors causing the delay or failure. The program assessment involves a number of techniques such as: water quality monitoring, a public watershed awareness assessment, a student awareness assessment, meeting evaluations, inspection results, and staff training assessments. Table 9-2 is an action plan specifically for conducting evaluation mechanisms. The table is similar to the action plan table in Section 8 and addresses the actions, schedule, responsible party, and cost to implement the evaluation mechanisms. Generally, determining the effectiveness of the actions is a qualitative process that relies on the program assessment showing at least minimal improvement in awareness and knowledge over time. 9-8 GLRC Watersheds April 2007
Page 2 and 3:
GLRC on Phase II Looking Glass Rive
Page 4 and 5:
P:\1666001\09 Looking Glass WMP\WMP
Page 6 and 7:
Table of Contents Organization of t
Page 8 and 9:
SECTION 10 - Plan Sustainability In
Page 10 and 11:
FIGURES Figure 1-1 Watershed Locati
Page 12 and 13:
Organization of the Plan This plan
Page 14 and 15:
9. Evaluation and Revision Section
Page 16 and 17:
! ! ! ! ! ! Forest Hill ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 18 and 19:
The goals and objectives were then
Page 20 and 21:
Looking Glass Watershed The Looking
Page 22 and 23:
• methods for evaluation of progr
Page 24 and 25:
References Center for Watershed Pro
Page 26 and 27:
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 28 and 29:
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 30 and 31:
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 32 and 33:
The majority of wetlands in the wat
Page 34 and 35:
commonly classified as hydrologic s
Page 36 and 37:
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 38 and 39:
Significant Natural Features to be
Page 40 and 41:
References Centers for Disease Cont
Page 42 and 43:
3. Water Quality Conditions People
Page 44 and 45:
sanitary sewer treatment system has
Page 46 and 47:
Section 3: Water Quality Conditions
Page 48 and 49:
Data Analysis Tetra Tech summarized
Page 50 and 51:
! ! ! ! ! ! Forest Hill ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 52 and 53:
! ! ! ! ! ! Forest Hill ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 54 and 55:
Table 3-4 explains the problems fou
Page 56 and 57:
Vermillion Creek Assessment Vermill
Page 58 and 59:
Volunteers identify the species bas
Page 60 and 61:
Watershed Fish Consumption The Mich
Page 62 and 63:
The coldwater fishery use does not
Page 64 and 65:
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 66 and 67:
Interpretation of Watershed Conditi
Page 68 and 69:
4. Community Outreach A watershed p
Page 70 and 71:
Public Comment on Draft Plan A draf
Page 72 and 73:
Public Education Plan Public educat
Page 74 and 75:
determining goals and desires for t
Page 76 and 77:
Table 5-1 Status of Designated Uses
Page 78 and 79: Sources The main sources of sedimen
Page 80 and 81: the time for the specified month. (
Page 82 and 83: Altered Hydrology Stream flows vary
Page 84 and 85: day as it is at a USGS gauging stat
Page 86 and 87: Figure 5-2 R-B Index at Eagle (USGS
Page 88 and 89: It should also be noted that the su
Page 90 and 91: Detergents are becoming a serious t
Page 92 and 93: Physical Pollutants Physical pollut
Page 94 and 95: Oil and grease are often referred t
Page 96 and 97: Table 5-14 Pesticide: Sources and C
Page 98 and 99: Introduction 6. Goals and Objective
Page 100 and 101: equirements, some objectives go bey
Page 102 and 103: Goal 3: Encourage Water Quality Fri
Page 104 and 105: general health of wetlands, primary
Page 106 and 107: References DAS Manufacturing. “Cu
Page 108 and 109: Several programs are available loca
Page 110 and 111: Better Site Design Better site desi
Page 112 and 113: Non-Storm Water Discharges Non-stor
Page 114 and 115: producers to meet personal objectiv
Page 116 and 117: Michigan Turfgrass Environmental St
Page 118 and 119: 8. Action Plan Source: Basetree, 20
Page 120 and 121: Table 8-1 Benefits of Goals No Goal
Page 122 and 123: 9. Evaluation Mechanisms “Not eve
Page 124 and 125: Evaluation Mechanisms Level One - A
Page 126 and 127: Program Implementation Program impl
Page 130 and 131: Assessing the evaluation mechanisms
Page 132 and 133: Goal 3: Encourage Water Quality Fri
Page 134 and 135: Goal 6: Protect and Increase Wetlan
Page 136 and 137: Evaluation Action Plan At the end o
Page 138 and 139: Evaluation Mechanisms Municipal Sta
Page 140 and 141: The committee defined appropriate w
Page 142 and 143: “It is the purpose of this Memora
Page 144 and 145: each other about how to protect and
Page 146 and 147: A-2 Looking Glass River Watershed A
Page 148 and 149: B-2 Looking Glass River Watershed A
Page 150 and 151: C-2 Looking Glass River Watershed A
Page 152 and 153: D-2 Looking Glass River Watershed A
Page 154 and 155: Appendix E Road Stream Surveys Appe
Page 156 and 157: Appendix F Vermillion Creek Corresp
show all

Looking Glass River Watershed Management Plan - Greater ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?