Looking Glass River Watershed Management Plan - Greater ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Sources The main sources of sediment are the erosion of uplands, lateral movement of channels into streambanks, and down cutting of streambeds. Natural erosion is present almost everywhere and results from wind and water passing over land surfaces. Table 5-2 identifies some general sources and causes of sediment based on anthropogenic influences. The sources and causes were ranked by reviewing all of the collected data (Section 2 and 3) and combining it with the knowledge of staff from the local communities. Table 5-2 Sediment Sources and Causes Sources Priority Cause (k=known, s=suspected) Priority Agricultural Runoff (k) 1 Lack of Buffer (k) 1 Poor Conservation Practices (k) 2 Over Grazing of Livestock (s) 3 Streambanks (k) 2 (tie) Flow Fluctuations (see Altered Hydrology) (k) 1 Lack of Buffer (k) 2 Livestock Access (k) 3 Human Access (s) 4 Construction Site Runoff (s) 2 (tie) Inadequate Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Controls (s) 1 Bare Soil (k) 4 High traffic area prevents vegetation (human or animal) (s) 1 Soil disturbances (e.g. gardening) (s) 2 Chemicals (e.g. excess salt, weed killer) (s) 3 Fire (s) 4 Drainage Ditches (s) 5 Flow Fluctuations (see Altered Hydrology) (s) 1 Ditch Cleanout without Soil Stabilization (k) 2 Livestock Access (s) 3 Human Access (s) 4 Gravel Roads, Parking Lots and Driveways (k) 6 Loss of surface material (s) 1 (tie) Lack of Buffer (s) 1 (tie) Poor Maintenance (s) 3 Livestock in Stream (k) 7 (tie) Unrestricted Access (k) 1 Road-Stream Crossings (culverts) (k) 7 (tie) Poor Maintenance (s) 1 Poor Design (s) 2 Poor Construction (s) 3 Human Access (s) 4 Loss of Material Around Storm Sewer System (s) 9 Poor Maintenance (s) 1 Poor Construction (s) 2 Sand for Winter Road (s) 10 Lack of Buffer (s) 1 Application Practices (s) 2 Poor Clean Up Practices (s) 3 Off-Road Vehicles (k) 11 Unrestricted Access (k) 1 Lack of Buffer (s) 2 Mining Operations/Gravel Pits (s) 12 Inadequate Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Controls (s) 1 Impact and Impairment Suspended sediment, through turbidity, reduces light penetration through the water thus reducing photosynthesis. Fish in nature avoid streams or stream reaches with high suspended sediment levels creating environments just as devoid of fish as if they had been killed. Deposited sediment increases the level of embeddedness of the stream bed (termed habitat reduction) resulting in a decrease of invertebrate populations and 5-4 Looking Glass River Watershed April 2007
consequently in food available to fish. Embeddedness refers to the extent to which gravel and cobbles are surrounded or covered by fine sediment. Indicators Direct measurement of the amount of sediment moving in the watercourse may be measured as the suspended solids (TSS), dissolved solids (TDS) and the bedload. Turbidity indirectly measures the amount of sediment by considering the amount of light passable through the water column. Conductivity may also be used to indirectly measure the dissolved solids. In addition, indicators such as the embeddedness and fish and benthic macroinvertebrate population and diversity may also be used as indicators of sediment. Water Quality Standards Water quality standards in Michigan are provided under the Administrative Rules Part 4 Water Quality Standards, promulgated pursuant to Part 31 of the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act, 1994 PA 451 as amended. Applicable standards include: Rule 50. The waters of the state shall not have any of the following unnatural physical properties in quantities which are or may become injurious to any designated use: • Turbidity • Color • Oil films • Floating solids • Foams • Settleable solids • Suspended solids • Deposits Rule 51. The addition of any dissolved solids shall not exceed concentrations which are or may become injurious to any designated use. Point sources containing dissolved solids shall be considered by the commission on a case-by-case basis and increases of dissolved solids in the waters of the state shall be limited through the application of best practicable control technology currently available as prescribed by the administrator of the United States environmental protection agency pursuant to section 304(b) of Public Law 92-500, as amended, 33 U.S.C. §466 et seq., except that in no instance shall total dissolved solids in the waters of the state exceed a concentration of 500 milligrams per liter as a monthly average nor more than 750 milligrams per liter at any time, as a result of controllable point sources. Rule 90. Applicability of water quality standards. (1) The requirements prescribed by these rules shall not apply within mixing zones, except for the requirements prescribed in R 323.1050, or as otherwise specified by these rules. (2) Water quality standards prescribed by these rules are minimally acceptable water quality conditions and shall apply at all flows equal to or exceeding the design flows, except where the department determines that a more restrictive design flow is necessary. The design flows in lotic systems shall be as follows: (a) unless otherwise stated in this rule, the design flow is equal to the lowest of the 12 monthly 95% exceedance flows. The 95% exceedance flow is the flow equal to or exceeded 95% of Section 5: Stressor Summary 5-5
Page 2 and 3:
GLRC on Phase II Looking Glass Rive
Page 4 and 5:
P:\1666001\09 Looking Glass WMP\WMP
Page 6 and 7:
Table of Contents Organization of t
Page 8 and 9:
SECTION 10 - Plan Sustainability In
Page 10 and 11:
FIGURES Figure 1-1 Watershed Locati
Page 12 and 13:
Organization of the Plan This plan
Page 14 and 15:
9. Evaluation and Revision Section
Page 16 and 17:
! ! ! ! ! ! Forest Hill ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 18 and 19:
The goals and objectives were then
Page 20 and 21:
Looking Glass Watershed The Looking
Page 22 and 23:
• methods for evaluation of progr
Page 24 and 25:
References Center for Watershed Pro
Page 26 and 27:
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 28 and 29: ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 30 and 31: ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 32 and 33: The majority of wetlands in the wat
Page 34 and 35: commonly classified as hydrologic s
Page 36 and 37: ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 38 and 39: Significant Natural Features to be
Page 40 and 41: References Centers for Disease Cont
Page 42 and 43: 3. Water Quality Conditions People
Page 44 and 45: sanitary sewer treatment system has
Page 46 and 47: Section 3: Water Quality Conditions
Page 48 and 49: Data Analysis Tetra Tech summarized
Page 50 and 51: ! ! ! ! ! ! Forest Hill ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 52 and 53: ! ! ! ! ! ! Forest Hill ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 54 and 55: Table 3-4 explains the problems fou
Page 56 and 57: Vermillion Creek Assessment Vermill
Page 58 and 59: Volunteers identify the species bas
Page 60 and 61: Watershed Fish Consumption The Mich
Page 62 and 63: The coldwater fishery use does not
Page 64 and 65: ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 66 and 67: Interpretation of Watershed Conditi
Page 68 and 69: 4. Community Outreach A watershed p
Page 70 and 71: Public Comment on Draft Plan A draf
Page 72 and 73: Public Education Plan Public educat
Page 74 and 75: determining goals and desires for t
Page 76 and 77: Table 5-1 Status of Designated Uses
Page 80 and 81: the time for the specified month. (
Page 82 and 83: Altered Hydrology Stream flows vary
Page 84 and 85: day as it is at a USGS gauging stat
Page 86 and 87: Figure 5-2 R-B Index at Eagle (USGS
Page 88 and 89: It should also be noted that the su
Page 90 and 91: Detergents are becoming a serious t
Page 92 and 93: Physical Pollutants Physical pollut
Page 94 and 95: Oil and grease are often referred t
Page 96 and 97: Table 5-14 Pesticide: Sources and C
Page 98 and 99: Introduction 6. Goals and Objective
Page 100 and 101: equirements, some objectives go bey
Page 102 and 103: Goal 3: Encourage Water Quality Fri
Page 104 and 105: general health of wetlands, primary
Page 106 and 107: References DAS Manufacturing. “Cu
Page 108 and 109: Several programs are available loca
Page 110 and 111: Better Site Design Better site desi
Page 112 and 113: Non-Storm Water Discharges Non-stor
Page 114 and 115: producers to meet personal objectiv
Page 116 and 117: Michigan Turfgrass Environmental St
Page 118 and 119: 8. Action Plan Source: Basetree, 20
Page 120 and 121: Table 8-1 Benefits of Goals No Goal
Page 122 and 123: 9. Evaluation Mechanisms “Not eve
Page 124 and 125: Evaluation Mechanisms Level One - A
Page 126 and 127: Program Implementation Program impl
Page 128 and 129:
The MDEQ/MDNR have conducted analyt
Page 130 and 131:
Assessing the evaluation mechanisms
Page 132 and 133:
Goal 3: Encourage Water Quality Fri
Page 134 and 135:
Goal 6: Protect and Increase Wetlan
Page 136 and 137:
Evaluation Action Plan At the end o
Page 138 and 139:
Evaluation Mechanisms Municipal Sta
Page 140 and 141:
The committee defined appropriate w
Page 142 and 143:
“It is the purpose of this Memora
Page 144 and 145:
each other about how to protect and
Page 146 and 147:
A-2 Looking Glass River Watershed A
Page 148 and 149:
B-2 Looking Glass River Watershed A
Page 150 and 151:
C-2 Looking Glass River Watershed A
Page 152 and 153:
D-2 Looking Glass River Watershed A
Page 154 and 155:
Appendix E Road Stream Surveys Appe
Page 156 and 157:
Appendix F Vermillion Creek Corresp
show all

Looking Glass River Watershed Management Plan - Greater ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?