Looking Glass River Watershed Management Plan - Greater ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

! ! ! ! ! ! Forest Hill ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Francis ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ingersoll ! ! ! ! Lowell ! Lowell ! ! National ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Grove Grov e ! Hide Aw ay ! ! ! ! ! Airport ! ! Hardke ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Schav ey ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Farm ! ! ! ! Norris ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Daggo t ! Wilson Dewitt ! Dewitt ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dewi t Turner ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tuck er State ! ! US 127 BR East Brook Kruger ! ! ! ! ! Northward ! ! ! ! ! Boichot ! ! ! ! ! !! Chetwyn ! Ohio ! ! ! ! ! Williams Wood ! ! ! ! ! Wi liams ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Gate Baird ! ! Bond ! Merlin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! West ! ! ! Krepps Coolidge ! ! ! ! ! Marfitt ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Harrison ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Colorado ! !! ! ! Chandler ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Forest ! ! ! ! Chandler ! ! ! ! Abbott Grove ! ! ! ! ! ! Chandler ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Towar ! Porter Alton ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hardy ! ! ! Watson ! Watson ! Tiffin ! Hagadorn ! ! ! Skyline ! ! ! Babcock ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Gary ! Saint Clair Webster ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Deerpath ! ! G K ! Angle ! ! Nic hols ! ! Center ! Center ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Center ! ! ! ! Robson Upton ! ! ! ! ! Upton ! ! Hunter ! Ho lister ! ! ! ! Peacock ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Woodbury ! ! ! Woodbury ! Dunn ! Pulver ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ribbey ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Warner ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Executive Summary “The significant problems we face cannot be solved at the same level of thinking we were at when they were created.” Lower Grand River Upper Grand River - Albert Einstein Looking Glass River Watershed Management Planning Area Michigan Watersheds, Looking Glass River Watershed, Tetra The Looking Glass River Watershed is one of three watersheds that were delineated as a result of the formation of the Greater Lansing Regional Committee on Phase II Nonpoint Source Pollution Prevention (GLRC) on May 21, 2004. The GLRC is comprised of 22 political agencies (i.e. communities, drain commissioner’s offices, and road commission) that each chose to fulfill the requirements of the Michigan Watershed-Based National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Phase II Storm Water Permit. The Looking Glass River Watershed contains 14 of the 22 political agencies. Working together as the Looking Glass River Watershed Committee, the permittees have developed this Watershed Management Plan (WMP) to fulfill the permit requirements. The Looking Glass River Watershed includes both rural and urban areas. The urban areas, which encompass approximately 11% of the watershed, include a portion of the Lansing metropolitan area (the Cities of Lansing, East Lansing, and Lansing Township), Meridian Township, and the City of DeWitt. The City of DeWitt and Bath and DeWitt Townships are experiencing development but still have rural (agricultural and forest) areas that can be protected. Watertown, Woodhull, Victor, Olive and Riley Townships are all in the watershed and all have rural areas with significant croplands. Watershed Location Map Participating NPDES Permittees • Bath Township • Clinton County Drain Commissioner • Clinton County Road Commission • DeWitt, City of • DeWitt Township • DeWitt Public School District • East Lansing, City of • Ingham County Drain Commissioner • Lansing, City of • Lansing Township • Lansing Public School District • Meridian Township • Watertown Township Watertown Twp W I 96 E I 96 Stoll Waters of the State State Roads Roads E I 96/E I 69 Grand River Legend Riley Twp Looking Glass River W I 69 Herbis on State Sto l County Boundary State Municipal Boundaries Watershed Howe Shady Brook ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! £¤ 127 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! City of Dewitt Dewitt Twp CLINTON COUNTY EATON COUNTY Ivy Sandhill Airport/E I 96 INGHAM COUNTY Wrenwood White Pine Redpole Shamrock Riv ergate Cutler Sara Ann Olive Twp Brookview Herbis on Main W I 69/Dewitt Dill Primrose Theresa State Golf Sanborn Clark Stoll Solon River Burlingame Keusc h Benne t Valley E I 69 6th Round Lake Webb Coleman Lansing Twp David Alward Chadwick City of Lansing S US 127 N US 127 Herbis on Sir Galahad Cadgewith Brown Tulane E I 69 CD Vassar ! ! Alward Howe Herbis on Coleman Abbey Wolf Lehman Stoll ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Unknown ! ! ! ! Lake Lansing Southlawn City of Ballantine Howe Bernier Sleight Biber Saginaw Hawk Hollow Biber Applegate Clise Victor Twp Vine Drumheller Webster/W I 69 Ann ! ! Outer Oakdale Park Lake Pine Hollow Sleight § ¨¦ 69 Chadwick Howe Alward Davis ! ! ! ! ! ! Bath Twp Meridian Twp Round Lake Herbis on W I 69/I 69 BL 4 Alward Old M 78 Cutler Sto l State Coleman Herbis on Old M 78 CLINTON COUNTY Chadwick Clark State SHIAWASSEE COUNTY Cutler ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Miss aukee Laingsburg Britton Sto l Laingsburg Corcoran Pollard Blackberry Sciota Twp Bath Woodbury /I69 Shoeman Deer Britton Lans ing Foster Gulick Woodhull Twp Beard Braden I 69 Barry Williamstown Twp Colby Lak e Moon Lake I 69 Gulick Zimmer Beard Oakes Lovejoy 0 1 2 3 4 Miles Water quality monitoring has been and continues to be conducted by the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ), the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR), and Friends of the Looking Glass to determine the effects of various land uses and specific problem areas. As part of this WMP, the permittees will support water quality monitoring to help show changes in water quality as the WMP is implemented. Executive Summary xv
Priority water bodies within the watershed include the Looking Glass River and the Vermillion Creek. Both of these water bodies have multiple designated uses that are threatened or impaired as listed by the MDEQ. The Vermillion Creek is impaired for ‘Untreated Sewage’ and ‘Discharge of Pathogens’. The original reason for listing Vermillion Creek as impaired has been resolved and is discussed further in Section 3. It is anticipated that successful completion of the WMP will help protect and restore designated uses of the water bodies within the Looking Glass River Watershed. Macroinvertebrate and fish communities are only as strong as the habitat available to them in the river corridor. Within that portion of the Looking Glass River Watershed, the habitat ranged from excellent to poor. This mixed bag of data tells us that there are areas of the watershed that are still pristine while other areas need restoration. Before the Looking Glass River reaches DeWitt, habitat quality was identified as good to excellent. Downstream of DeWitt, data shows that macroinvertebrates are significantly impaired and there is a complete absence of intolerant species. Heavy sedimentation deposition and urban debris were common. The populations and diversity rebound by the time the river reached Wright and Howe Roads, downstream of this watershed planning area (Evans 1976). Summers Drain, Faiver Drain, Remy-Chandler Drain, Mud Creek, and Vermillion Creek all have identified concerns and the designated use of warmwater fisheries and other aquatic life and wildlife is considered to be threatened. Development of the WMP and the decision making process of the watershed committee has involved input from the general public and the stakeholders. Multiple public meetings were held at the start of the WMP development, four stakeholder workshops were held throughout the planning process, and the public was invited to comment near the completion of the plan. At these meetings, the WMP stakeholders and the general public expressed their concerns and vision for the watershed which includes having swimmable and fishable water bodies and significant public education as top priorities. In addition to the vision of the general public and stakeholders, consideration was given to the restoration and protection of the designated uses of the water bodies. The following goals were developed through the public participation and input process: • Educate the Public about the Importance of Protecting and Managing the Watershed • Provide a Sustainable and Equitable Funding Source • Encourage Water Quality Friendly Development • Restore and Enhance Recreational Uses Through Development of a Watershed Recreation Plan • Protect and Enhance Habitat for Wildlife and Aquatic Animals Through Development of a Watershed Habitat Plan • Protect and Increase Wetlands Through Development of a Watershed Habitat Plan • Provide Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping Practices for Municipal Operations • Strive to Eliminate Pathogens to Meet Total and Partial Body Contact for Recreational Uses • Encourage Water Quality Friendly Agricultural Practices Looking Glass River Watershed, Tetra Tech, 2005 Looking Glass River near Babcock Rd., Tetra Tech, 2005 Looking Glass River Watershed, Tetra Tech, 2005 Vermillion Creek at Woodbury Road, Tetra Tech, 2005 xvi Looking Glass River Watershed April 2007
Page 2 and 3: GLRC on Phase II Looking Glass Rive
Page 4 and 5: P:\1666001\09 Looking Glass WMP\WMP
Page 6 and 7: Table of Contents Organization of t
Page 8 and 9: SECTION 10 - Plan Sustainability In
Page 10 and 11: FIGURES Figure 1-1 Watershed Locati
Page 12 and 13: Organization of the Plan This plan
Page 14 and 15: 9. Evaluation and Revision Section
Page 18 and 19: The goals and objectives were then
Page 20 and 21: Looking Glass Watershed The Looking
Page 22 and 23: • methods for evaluation of progr
Page 24 and 25: References Center for Watershed Pro
Page 26 and 27: ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 28 and 29: ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 30 and 31: ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 32 and 33: The majority of wetlands in the wat
Page 34 and 35: commonly classified as hydrologic s
Page 36 and 37: ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 38 and 39: Significant Natural Features to be
Page 40 and 41: References Centers for Disease Cont
Page 42 and 43: 3. Water Quality Conditions People
Page 44 and 45: sanitary sewer treatment system has
Page 46 and 47: Section 3: Water Quality Conditions
Page 48 and 49: Data Analysis Tetra Tech summarized
Page 50 and 51: ! ! ! ! ! ! Forest Hill ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 52 and 53: ! ! ! ! ! ! Forest Hill ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 54 and 55: Table 3-4 explains the problems fou
Page 56 and 57: Vermillion Creek Assessment Vermill
Page 58 and 59: Volunteers identify the species bas
Page 60 and 61: Watershed Fish Consumption The Mich
Page 62 and 63: The coldwater fishery use does not
Page 64 and 65: ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Page 66 and 67:
Interpretation of Watershed Conditi
Page 68 and 69:
4. Community Outreach A watershed p
Page 70 and 71:
Public Comment on Draft Plan A draf
Page 72 and 73:
Public Education Plan Public educat
Page 74 and 75:
determining goals and desires for t
Page 76 and 77:
Table 5-1 Status of Designated Uses
Page 78 and 79:
Sources The main sources of sedimen
Page 80 and 81:
the time for the specified month. (
Page 82 and 83:
Altered Hydrology Stream flows vary
Page 84 and 85:
day as it is at a USGS gauging stat
Page 86 and 87:
Figure 5-2 R-B Index at Eagle (USGS
Page 88 and 89:
It should also be noted that the su
Page 90 and 91:
Detergents are becoming a serious t
Page 92 and 93:
Physical Pollutants Physical pollut
Page 94 and 95:
Oil and grease are often referred t
Page 96 and 97:
Table 5-14 Pesticide: Sources and C
Page 98 and 99:
Introduction 6. Goals and Objective
Page 100 and 101:
equirements, some objectives go bey
Page 102 and 103:
Goal 3: Encourage Water Quality Fri
Page 104 and 105:
general health of wetlands, primary
Page 106 and 107:
References DAS Manufacturing. “Cu
Page 108 and 109:
Several programs are available loca
Page 110 and 111:
Better Site Design Better site desi
Page 112 and 113:
Non-Storm Water Discharges Non-stor
Page 114 and 115:
producers to meet personal objectiv
Page 116 and 117:
Michigan Turfgrass Environmental St
Page 118 and 119:
8. Action Plan Source: Basetree, 20
Page 120 and 121:
Table 8-1 Benefits of Goals No Goal
Page 122 and 123:
9. Evaluation Mechanisms “Not eve
Page 124 and 125:
Evaluation Mechanisms Level One - A
Page 126 and 127:
Program Implementation Program impl
Page 128 and 129:
The MDEQ/MDNR have conducted analyt
Page 130 and 131:
Assessing the evaluation mechanisms
Page 132 and 133:
Goal 3: Encourage Water Quality Fri
Page 134 and 135:
Goal 6: Protect and Increase Wetlan
Page 136 and 137:
Evaluation Action Plan At the end o
Page 138 and 139:
Evaluation Mechanisms Municipal Sta
Page 140 and 141:
The committee defined appropriate w
Page 142 and 143:
“It is the purpose of this Memora
Page 144 and 145:
each other about how to protect and
Page 146 and 147:
A-2 Looking Glass River Watershed A
Page 148 and 149:
B-2 Looking Glass River Watershed A
Page 150 and 151:
C-2 Looking Glass River Watershed A
Page 152 and 153:
D-2 Looking Glass River Watershed A
Page 154 and 155:
Appendix E Road Stream Surveys Appe
Page 156 and 157:
Appendix F Vermillion Creek Corresp
show all

Looking Glass River Watershed Management Plan - Greater ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?