Price Determination in the Australian Food Industry A Report
Price Determination in the Australian Food Industry A Report
Price Determination in the Australian Food Industry A Report
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
PROCESSED PINEAPPLES – ANALYSIS OF PRICING<br />
The <strong>in</strong>dustry’s product mix<br />
The majority of <strong>the</strong> annual p<strong>in</strong>eapple crop is processed <strong>in</strong>to a range of t<strong>in</strong>ned and m<strong>in</strong>imally<br />
processed products. It is estimated that <strong>the</strong> offtake of product by <strong>the</strong> major processor, Golden<br />
Circle, is about 70 per cent of total output.<br />
Figure 72. Retail and farmgate prices for p<strong>in</strong>eapple, 450g t<strong>in</strong>, cents/t<strong>in</strong>, 1996–2003<br />
cents<br />
160<br />
140<br />
120<br />
retail<br />
100<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
fruit growers<br />
0<br />
1996 2003<br />
Pric<strong>in</strong>g of p<strong>in</strong>eapples at <strong>the</strong> farmgate has historically been set accord<strong>in</strong>g to production quotas.<br />
These were allocated by Golden Circle accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> level of supplier sharehold<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
company. Supply rights were stapled to <strong>the</strong> shares. Through this mechanism, <strong>the</strong> company set<br />
pool prices for quota and non-quota supply where <strong>the</strong> quota allocation represented <strong>the</strong> majority of<br />
<strong>the</strong> company’s committed production requirements and <strong>the</strong> non-quota returns fluctuated as<br />
<strong>in</strong>fluenced by <strong>the</strong> world market for p<strong>in</strong>eapples.<br />
<strong>Price</strong> <strong>Determ<strong>in</strong>ation</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Industry</strong> A <strong>Report</strong><br />
Dur<strong>in</strong>g this time, p<strong>in</strong>eapple pric<strong>in</strong>g was treated <strong>in</strong> a similar way to milk pric<strong>in</strong>g by a cooperative.<br />
P<strong>in</strong>eapple prices were set as a key balanc<strong>in</strong>g item <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial performance of <strong>the</strong> group. In<br />
2001, <strong>the</strong> nexus between fruit prices and sharehold<strong>in</strong>g was broken and commercial prices were set<br />
for fruit <strong>in</strong> accordance with long-term supply contracts which conta<strong>in</strong> specifications on supply<br />
commitments and product quality.<br />
The pric<strong>in</strong>g of product<br />
The chart on <strong>the</strong> left shows <strong>the</strong> comparison between retail value (per ABS data) and <strong>the</strong> payment<br />
for fruit content <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> t<strong>in</strong>ned product. Fruit payments represent a small portion (less than 10 per<br />
cent) of <strong>the</strong> overall costs of <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess given <strong>the</strong> diverse nature of <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess of <strong>the</strong> company.<br />
The sensitivity of marg<strong>in</strong> analysis to <strong>the</strong> company and <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry prevents <strong>the</strong> disclosure of an<br />
analysis of <strong>the</strong> share of <strong>the</strong> retail dollar.<br />
Figure 73. Use of raw material <strong>in</strong> process<strong>in</strong>g<br />
M<strong>in</strong>imally<br />
processed l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
Canned fruit<br />
Outsized fruit<br />
Usage: < 3% 20-25% rema<strong>in</strong>der<br />
low-volume fresh<br />
products us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />
best qualiy fruit.<br />
• slices<br />
• pieces<br />
• crushed<br />
Fruit<br />
• waste (up to 30%)<br />
• juice<br />
• concentrate<br />
70