17.11.2012 Views

7754 Vol 1 Flyleaf - ICAO Public Maps

7754 Vol 1 Flyleaf - ICAO Public Maps

7754 Vol 1 Flyleaf - ICAO Public Maps

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

AOP III-7<br />

parties involved for each component<br />

(terminal/apron/aircraft operations) using agreed methods<br />

and criteria for level of delays.<br />

Note 1.— The result of the aerodrome capacity<br />

assessment, as required by and detailed in paragraphs 56<br />

to 59 should be reflected in Table AOP of the FASID<br />

against each airport entry listed in this table.<br />

Note 2.— The figures used to reflect this assessment,<br />

together with the updating process of these elements, are<br />

detailed in the explanation of Table AOP of the FASID.<br />

61. Where restrictions in aerodrome capacity are<br />

identified, a full range of options for their reduction or<br />

removal should be evaluated by the aerodrome authority,<br />

in close cooperation with the operators and other involved<br />

parties. Such options should include<br />

technical/operational/procedural and environmental<br />

improvements and facility expansion.<br />

62. At many aerodromes, airspace capacity has<br />

influence on the aerodrome capacity. If the declared<br />

capacity of a specified airspace has influence on airport<br />

operations, this should be indicated and action undertaken<br />

to reach a capacity in this airspace corresponding to the<br />

airport capacity.<br />

63. Major research and development programmes<br />

should be undertaken in order to implement new initiatives<br />

for increasing airport capacity.<br />

64. Due to lack of capacity at many international<br />

airports, a better and more efficient utilization of existing<br />

runways is required. Runway selection procedures and<br />

standard taxi routes at aerodromes should ensure an<br />

optimum flow of air traffic with a minimum of delay and a<br />

maximum use of available capacity. They should also, if<br />

possible, take account of the need to keep taxiing times for<br />

arriving and departing aircraft to a minimum.<br />

65. Extreme traffic peaking at aerodromes generates<br />

Physical characteristics<br />

69. Even though at specific aerodromes CAT II or III<br />

operations may not be a requirement during the period<br />

covered by the plan, account should nevertheless be taken<br />

in the planning for such aerodromes of possible future<br />

requirements in order to avoid costly and disruptive<br />

modifications at a later date. This applies in particular<br />

whenever replacement or improvement programmes are<br />

undertaken. However, investments needed to prepare for<br />

congestion and severe economic penalties, such as<br />

under-utilization of costly aerodrome facilities and services,<br />

inefficient facility design criteria and delays to aircraft and<br />

passengers. Improvements should be obtained from<br />

effective consultation between the airlines, aerodrome and<br />

government authorities to achieve maximum capacity<br />

utilization.<br />

66. The possibility of overcoming capacity limitations<br />

should also take the use of other aerodromes in the vicinity<br />

into consideration.<br />

Note.— Guidance material on capacity and level of<br />

service is presented in Attachment C to Part III — AOP of<br />

the EUR FASID. Issues related to the management of<br />

critical areas for navigation aids needs to be taken into<br />

account when assessing aerodrome capacity.<br />

PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS<br />

Alternate aerodromes<br />

67. Requirements for alternate aerodromes should, if<br />

at all possible, be satisfied by existing regular aerodromes.<br />

However, where in specific cases the designation of<br />

another aerodrome in close proximity to a regular<br />

aerodrome would result in appreciable fuel conservation or<br />

other operational advantages, this aerodrome may be<br />

designated for use as an alternate aerodrome only.<br />

68. Planning of alternate aerodromes should be made<br />

on the basis of the following objectives:<br />

a) to ensure that at least one suitable alternate is available<br />

for each international operation;<br />

b) to ensure that the facilities at the designated alternate<br />

aerodrome(s) are appropriate for the alternate operation.<br />

future CAT II or III operations at specific aerodromes<br />

should always be subject to cost-benefit analysis.<br />

Non-visual aids for aerodrome operations<br />

70. When developing implementation and/or<br />

decommissioning plans for all weather operations at<br />

international aerodromes, due consideration should be<br />

given to specific operations requirements of general<br />

avaiation.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!